Posted on 06/24/2022 8:17:16 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
*The U.S. Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs Wade, effectively ending Federal Recognition of a Constitutional right to abortion and giving individual states in the union the power to allow, limit and ban the practice altogether.*
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Even if, murder is a state crime, not a federal one.
Because under the Constitution a person's fundamental right to live has nothing to do with the state he resides in. If a state tries to deprive you of your life without due process, it's a federal matter.
Women dont want to give up the fake legal right to murder another person solely at their choosing.
Its playing God. They dont wanna give that up. No man has that legal power just by being a man.
Thar you go!
My contention is that it isn’t something that needs interpretation. It was not enumerated as a federal purview at the time and shouldn’t be now because IF that question had been put to them then they’d have found it (abortion) unconscionable and banned it outright.
To try and apply constantly changing views and interpretations of today against the Constitution’s specific language and ACCEPTED adoption is pointless. It just throws more folderol argument to those who want to claim murder of unborn humans is “reproductive health.”
"...The end of all our exploring Will be to arrive where we started And know the place for the first time.- T.S. Elliot, Little Gidding (1943)
Don’t this just let states make there own abortion laws. Which some have been doing anyways.
So what is 5-4? He voted against overturning it! He sided with the evil baby killing rats. This speaks volumes...he is not a conservative! Never has been!
I shall smile the remainder of this day while Thanking God
Technically true, however, "States' Rights" infer the people's ability to exercise their rights within their States without undesignated powers by the Fedgov. BTW, the Fedgov has no rights either - only powers. It's pretty clear in the 10th Amendment.
This must be quite a devastating bit of news for you. All of that propaganda you’ve been spreading for years on end up in smoke yet again - this time BIGLY.
Not at all.
Although I’m sure you’ll be thrilled when all of your Bush League Republicans pass amnesty.
The word “liberty” itself is fairly vague, the meaning of which is, of course, difficult to define in a legal sense. Liberty has been interpreted before essentially to mean liberty in the aggregate. To begin with, let’s look at what liberty means. It means freedom, and is an essential right that a person has. The word most commonly is used to mean being able to exercise a freedom, to take an action, or even think a certain way - without being prevented from doing so, and without being forced to do so.
There is no right to kill your baby!
Looking forward to your report back.
States have rights. The federal government has enumerated powers.
Samuel Alito: Nominated by George W Bush, to replace the execrable Sandra Day O’Connor.
Clarence Thomas: Nominated by George H W Bush, to replace the even more execrable Thurgood Marshall.
Thanks a lot, George (H) W BRILLIANT!!!!
Well, the two Bushes did do good.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.