Father, thank you, thank you for this.
For the sake of His sorrowful passion, have mercy on us and on the whole world.
The toll of the original decision: 63+ million dead, unborn Americans.
Thank you, President Trump! This is Step 1. Step 2 is when the USSC rules abortion itself unconstitutional.
Praise goes to God, and to our 45th President Donald J Trump, who appointed three justices to this Supreme Court. It took a civil war to overturn the infamous Dred Scott decision, but the Supreme Court itself has righted the massive wrong inflicted by Roe v Wade.
PRAISE GOD!
There are 6 conservatives. Why was it 5-4?
LOL, Susan Collins is probably thinking now, “Oh s___, what have I done?”
Note the phrasing in the opinion, top of page 11: “The regulation of a medical procedure that only one sex can undergo...”
That’ll explode a few skulls right there. :)
Bttt.
5.56mm
DOBBS v. JACKSON WOMEN’S HEALTH ORGANIZATION BREYER, SOTOMAYOR, and KAGAN, JJ., dissenting "The reasons for retaining Roe and Casey gain further strength from the overwhelming reliance interests those decisions have created. The Court adheres to precedent not just for institutional reasons, but because it recognizes thatstability in the law is “an essential thread in the mantle of protection that the law affords the individual.” Florida Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Servs. v. Florida Nursing Home Assn., 450 U. S. 147, 154 (1981) (Stevens, J., concurring). So when overruling precedent “would dislodge [individuals’] settled rights and expectations,” stare decisis has “added force.” Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways Comm’n, 502 U. S. 197, 202 (1991). Casey understood that to deny individuals’ reliance on Roe was to “refuse to face the fact[s].” 505 U. S., at 856. Today the majority refuses to face the facts. “The most striking feature of the [majority] is the absence of any serious discussion” of how its ruling will affect women."
What was the law before Roe, ladies? Why should anyone state Roe is 'settled law'? What was the stare decisis before Roe? "That which has come before."
The issue properly belonged to the states, did it not? And is there any real argument that the 'penumbra', if it exists, is for each state to decide.
But look how quickly the Dissenters abandoned "stare decisis" -- ONE SENTENCE LATER.
"How its ruling will affect women."
Women that are already born. Women, that if they are as dumb as Sotomayor, should not be procreating, should not be attempting to procreate.
Likewise FEDERAL funding of abortion done by Planned Parenthood should be removed immediately; but it will never happen.
Immediately, the Case should be made that Federal Funding to Abortion Providers is hereby IMMEDIATELY Prohibited.
And I have to be in D.C. next week at Arlington National Cemetery for a funeral...SMH...
Praise the Lord! Thank you Lord!
Somebody comfort me and tell me this won’t cause the D’s to keep Congress...
Maybe we’ll stop the excessive use of abortions and start encouraging people to use conctraceptives more often (modern contraceptives are really good nowadays).
Yes, but Joe Biden says he will make and EO and restore it so we can ignore SCOTUS. /s
Wonderful & glorious new, GB!
Takes a long time for the court to overturn bad law and errors in opinions.
50 years.
Thanks be to God!!
