Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dr. Oz is in serious trouble in Pennsylvania According to Polls
Hotair ^ | 06/22/2022 | AllahPundit

Posted on 06/22/2022 10:29:22 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
To: lightman
Senator Pothead will blow a smoke ring of thanks for your support.

That's fine. Trump and the GOP need to understand it is not about them. It is about the constitution and individual liberty.

If they want to be Democrat Lite, they can do so without my support.

61 posted on 06/23/2022 6:54:52 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (We are being manipulated by forces that most do not see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: caww

Oz is far better than the democrat, and he can still win if he hits the MAGA issues hard.


62 posted on 06/23/2022 6:58:09 AM PDT by Socon-Econ (adi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Dang! Look at blacks in these polls. They suck, yea I said it.


63 posted on 06/23/2022 7:08:12 AM PDT by stevio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nonliberal
And McConnell and Cornyn will still be in “leadership.” Does it really make a difference if they have a D or R behind their name if you still get D policies? Just skip the Senate vote on the ballot. There is no reason to give the Senate to the Republicans.

I understand that sentiment. I don't agree with it, but I understand it. Know this though: John Fetterman will be the most liberal, most thoroughly Marxist Senator any state has ever elected, and he is deceptively clever about both hiding it and selling Marxism to the masses. You sit on your hands and let him walk into office, he will find a way to stick around and spread his ideology. He will become a far bigger problem for the future of the nation than six years of a celebrity (who will probably tire of the job after one term anyway).

64 posted on 06/23/2022 7:11:37 AM PDT by jz638
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

The constitution says who can’t be blocked from running for office, it says nothing about what a voter can consider when voting.

If voters won’t vote for someone because of his religion, race or sex, or age or color of eyes, or anything else, that is their constitutional right.


65 posted on 06/23/2022 7:15:00 AM PDT by ansel12 ( Kill a Commie for Mommy, proud NATO warrior under Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: PA Presbyterian

Mccormicks wife is Goldman Sachs and Mcmaster buddy Dina Powell. If you mean safer choice in terms of winning an election...maybe.

safer choice as far as power etc... ...I dont think so.


66 posted on 06/23/2022 7:24:54 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Socon-Econ

Unfortunatly Pa is not a state that puts up strong candidates. But as is said Oz is still a much better choice than Fetterman by far. How Oz would be in the Senate, if he wins, is questionable.


67 posted on 06/23/2022 7:28:48 AM PDT by caww (O death, when you seized my Lord, you lost your grip on me......Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: caww
I get a strong Fib OZ can’t be trusted

His long-time close association with Orca Winfrey should be enough to tell you that. Not sure what possessed Trump to endorse this turd, but it's just one more reason why I ignore "endorsements" regardless of which celebrity, organization, or politician emitted them.

68 posted on 06/23/2022 7:34:20 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

agree...


69 posted on 06/23/2022 7:39:50 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Russ
I will consider my vote for Oz in November as a vote against Fetterman, not an endorsement of Oz.

You can consider anything you like. Politicians don't care whether you "hold your nose" or whatever other euphemism you use to assuage your seared conscience.

A vote for Oz is a vote for Oz (and an endorsement of everything he represents); that is all Oz and his handlers care about. Cast your vote how you see fit, but don't lie to yourself about it.

70 posted on 06/23/2022 7:42:19 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain
Well Trump wasn't given a great Pa. slate to choose from either. It's very frustrating to Pa. voters that our candidates are rarely anything to crow about.

In my town we are so fortunate to have a great State Rep who is highly active for us and in Washington as well. But generally even local elections could do far better in candidate selection.

71 posted on 06/23/2022 7:59:44 AM PDT by caww (O death, when you seized my Lord, you lost your grip on me......Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain
.....”A vote for Oz is a vote for Oz (and an endorsement of everything he represents)”.....

I don't think our vote signifies an endorsement of “everything” they represent. Oz is a practicing Sufism Muslim and also practices transcendental mediation. Neither of which I would endorse. His dual citizenship with Turkey as well. So my vote would be to oppose Fetterman. Fettermans clear opposition to most all I hold necessary is far far worse.

72 posted on 06/23/2022 8:06:29 AM PDT by caww (O death, when you seized my Lord, you lost your grip on me......Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“ And that’s not the only ominous data in the AARP poll.

I’ve made my feelings clear about Doug Mastriano in earlier posts. He’s a menace to American democracy whose victory in Pennsylvania’s gubernatorial race would raise the odds considerably of a constitutional crisis in 2024, particularly if Trump is the Republican nominee.”

Yeah, we know where AARP and this guy stand. Deep in DNC doo doo.


73 posted on 06/23/2022 8:19:02 AM PDT by jdsteel (Do I really need a /sarc?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tea Party Terrorist
OK Groomer.

You're just another childish troll on the internet.

74 posted on 06/23/2022 8:21:24 AM PDT by BlackbirdSST (Trump WON!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Fetterman endorses and supports the Biden/Wolf agenda. If Pennsylvanians are that stupid to elect Fetterman then they deserve what they get.


75 posted on 06/23/2022 8:28:07 AM PDT by eeriegeno (Checks and balances??? What checks and balances?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww; lightman

I’m going to hold my nose and vote for him, trusting that Trump can influence him on the major issues.

Fetterman is a stoner biker, and as liberal, if not mere, than Wolf.

I sure don’t want another Wolf.


76 posted on 06/23/2022 8:29:05 AM PDT by airborne (Thank you Rush for helping me find FreeRepublic! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Kathy might have won if it weren’t for Hannity’s lies. I voted for her.
On the other hand, A lot of people here complained about TOOMEY voting to impeach Trump, but they don’t care if Fetterman is our senator and would also vote to impeach Trump.


77 posted on 06/23/2022 8:36:21 AM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: airborne

Feterman comes across to me as just a thug.


78 posted on 06/23/2022 8:37:45 AM PDT by caww (O death, when you seized my Lord, you lost your grip on me......Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: jdsteel

Mastriano is making this a race.


79 posted on 06/23/2022 8:48:59 AM PDT by cowboyusa (America Cowboy up! S Matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Zenjitsuman

I wasn’t defending Oz. I was defending Trump. The poster said Trump (not Oz) should fade away.


80 posted on 06/23/2022 8:50:48 AM PDT by lewislynn (The Murdochs might be citizens but they aren't true blue Americans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson