Posted on 06/08/2022 5:11:07 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
I think maybe it’s more the poster...
Their insane blood feud against the Trump family needs to be met with at least two years of intense revenge against them when they lose power this November. Nonstop investigation of each and every Democrat leader in Congress. They have to pay.
Is anyone going to investigate why Nancy Pelosi just purchased massive amounts of Apple and Microsoft?
True
This is why Trump MUST be re-elected.
DJT off the chain.
And most Americans sit by and watch
Indeed.
The Clintons stole everything but the paint off the walls in the WH when they left. didn’t see any House/Senate panels investigating their thievery.
The Nazgul team is screaching simce the Master(s) have ordered him destroyed but the Ring keeps moving steadily and inevitably toward the Cracks of Doom.
They wail but know deep down that their Shadow is coming to an end.
Yet Nancy’s stock pics would make pit bosses call for security in Las Vegas, to drag her down to the basement for a tune up.
Multi-millionaire uses executive privilege to sneak off with set of 23K gold rimmed falafel plates, 2 ceremonial Saudi Arabian scimitars (solid silver) previously used in public executions of political officials, 4 ruby-studded hookah pipes from a Moroccan cafe owner, 24 pair of size 13 Ecuadoran Huarache sandals, etc.
Yep, Trump made out like a bandit. Arrest him...and don’t forget the leg irons.
Parts of our Declaration of Independence are looking eerily familiar...
And isn’t there a report out that one of Hunter Biden’s hookers got 20K in PPP money on the day BiteMe was installed...?
Didn’t we already go through this farce? Or was that looking for things that Trump “stole” from the White House when he left.
What I read in just the headline, is that they are still fishing. Because they have nothing with the J6 sham investigation.
Hey, go ahead and investigate, Dems. Use your last 25 weeks hunting that snipe.
You ought to be able to get a hearing on that indictment in about two years.
Ewwww...that brings up a really bad image.
I wonder if Epstein supplied hookers are covered by the emoluments clause.
Didn’t they try this with Senator NIXON back in 1952? The “Checkers” speech comes to mind.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.