Posted on 06/03/2022 8:18:17 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
After enjoying years of taxpayer-funded protection from agencies and departments, many of which avail themselves of AR-15 rifles, Hillary Clinton tweeted Friday, “No one actually needs an AR-15.”
This is not the first time Clinton has a taken a position against guns that runs totally counter to the fact she has spent many years of her life living with the peace of mind that comes from being protected by good guys with guns.
Following the December 2, 2015, San Bernardino attack that killed 14, Clinton said, “Guns, in and of themselves…will not make Americans safer.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Well if Hillary the felon says so…..
Feral hog eradication in Texas and elsewhere across the
Nation . No other weapons system will do
No one needs your opinion, skank.
ROFLOL!
“Well what are you looking at? What do you think I’m some kind of a jerk or something! - And this. That’s all I need.
The ashtray, the remote control, the paddle game, and this magazine, and the chair.
[goes outside]
And I don’t need one other thing, except my dog.”
[Shithead growls at him]
“I don’t need my dog.”
No one needs Hillary.
She shouldn’t be
A deranged individual can kill 2 or 3 dozen with an AR-15 and this is tragic. The AR-15 is a very effective weapon but is not an assault rifle.
Out of control government (always leftist) can and has killed millions in the past after they disarmed their population.
Hitler = mass murderer
Stalin = mass murderer
Mao = mass murderer
Pol Pot = mass murderer
Castro = mass murderer
I assure you the radical left in the United States is willing and will use mass murder if they can get away with it. Their hatred of the constitution and conservatives is pathological. They are capable of killing with righteous joy in their heart. That is why we need our AR-15s!
Esta mierda otra vez? It is the Bill of Rights-NOT “needs”-the stupid bitch “needs” to have some more vodka and go away...
Every time I hear someone say “nobody needs an AR 15….. i want to invite them to spend a couple of weeks at our ranch working cattle and be in the 90 acres of woods also on our place. I can change their opinion.
Seems to me that Seth Rich could have used one.
HEY! Guess how many times the word “need” appears in the US Constitution?
Answer: ZERO.
“Needful” appears twice, neither of those in relation to firearms or the Second Amendment.
So who decided that “need” was a legitimate litmus test on firearm ownership?
Man has only four needs. Air, water, food, and shelter. Everything else you have you have because you want it, not because you need it. What makes you think your want for a Mercedes-Benz or a pair of Adidas or a Gucci handbag is any more legitimate than my want for an AR-15?
Make sure your bodyguards get rid of theirs’s then Cankles.
My wife didn’t like the AR-15 variants, so she settled on the Ruger Mini-14. (AKA Ranch Rifle)
Shall not be infringed!
No one actually needs a fully-automatic Hillary
Hey, Hillary: ‘No One Actually Needs a Dildo Either’
I don’t NEED an AR-15, if I can substitute the old tried and true M-1 Carbine. Light weight, dependable, 30 caliber for more punch, 15 rounds...and it doesn’t look SCARY!
Killed Krauts and Japs in its day...
M-1 Carbine is a good choice.
Kyle Rittenhouse used a weapon to defend himself, regardless of the weapon. The NFAC brandished weapons as a threat. They were the aggressors.
The libs don’t want us to have the ability to defend ourselves against their thug army.
The AR-15 is step one of their efforts to disarm us.
Shall not be infringed means what it says.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.