Baker back on the stand now
Defense up
Live thread
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4064524/posts?page=51
> Baker told the jury he had not prepared for questions about his meeting with Sussmann and had not refreshed his memory at the time.
i.e. he hadn’t got the story straight yet. This is yet another modified limited hangout.
Let’s see, one juror’s daughter is a friend of Sussman’s daughter at school/family friend and on the same rowing team, and another juror is a huge Clinton donor.
What could go wrong?
Political, DC Swamp Lawyer just walks into FBI office off the street, gives them all kinds of secret intelligence against Trump - and FBI just runs with it?
Sussmann is just a patsy. The FBI should be on trial.
Yeah, but Sussman got back and billed the Clinton campaign for his time. That indicates otherwise. And Baker probably has a selective memory. If he’s “100 percent confident” in his recollection from 6 years ago, I’m 100 percent confident he’s lying.
These are the DC courts, where the book is thrown at republicans and democrats walk.
A jury member who donated to Clinton's campaign and said he would "strive to be objective as possible" was allowed to remain by the Obammy appointed judge. There is also an AOC voter on the jury. You only need one jury member to say there's not enough evidence to convict, and Sussman will walk.
I’ll pay attention as soon as the conviction is announced.
p
After being convicted Sussman is going to sing like a cornholed canary just to get the prosecution to ask for a lenient sentence.
Sing little Sussman, SING!
And them we will get all the swamp names we do not have now.