Posted on 05/12/2022 6:02:51 AM PDT by Red Badger
Sharyl Attkisson Says FBI Intended to Plant Child Porn on Husband's Computer pic.twitter.com/3Sa71NKqgq
— Breitbart News (@BreitbartNews) May 11, 2022
Stunning testimony today from Sharyl Attkisson.
VIDEO AT LINK.................
Sharyl Attkisson: "Rather than demanding accountability, I think we've slipped into a sort of 1984 style of acceptance." pic.twitter.com/JbafKxKJVI
— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) May 10, 2022
That was kind of funny.
Ok. You win.
Thanks for the laugh.
Have a great day.
“it has now legally been “downloaded to your computer” whether you actually meant to or not. “
But consider that for most laws to be prosecuted, there has to be willful intent. If the link was titled “Click here to view child porn” and was clicked, that is proof of intent. If it was titled “Click here to see Washington cherry blossoms in springtime”, that shows there was no intent.
If I take the wrong umbrella when leaving a restaurant, although technically I did indeed take someone else’s umbrella, I don’t get charged with stealing if I can show I accidentally took one that looked like mine.
I’ll pass on the leadership roles... But you can count on my accuracy with the trusty ‘ol 300WINNMAG!! lol...
Reality is... try to tell that to a crooked biased judge who should not allow it but does.
Indeed.
All of that is 1000% true. My only beef with this is she has to be careful as stating as fact, something she can’t prove. Doing that make her lose credibility, and then all other facts get thrown away - “She just makes stuff up with no proof...” Better to say “They may have intended...” or “Were they trying to...”.
Being caught with K porn instantly destroys the recipients credibility and legitimacy and it’s 99% impossible to argue that somebody else caused that material to land on your computer. It’s the perfect device not just for discrediting someone, but immediately forcing them into very serious legal jeopardy and deep into six figures of legal defense. As such, it’s very hard to imagine the FBI and plenty of other intel agys do not have that capability. Knowing what we know.
Going back to Windows XP days and even before, there were network/ethernet cards that could remotely turn on a computer that was plugged into the AC line but otherwise shut off. Today, people do not have to buy separate network cards, they are universally built into (”integrated with”) the motherboard. Same with video, anyone using normal office-grade video need not buy a sepearate video card, video is built into the m-board.
I don’t know if a typical integrated network “card” bought today or 2-3-4 years ago (it’s still often called a “card” even tho it’s not a separate physical card that you have to buy and install in a slot) has that remote turn-on capability. I’d be surprised if that capability was not there. It’s not rocket science to implement.
I believe S. Atkisson was sitting at her computer multiple times during the past several years and witnessed her computer “turning itself” on and of course booting up. If the FBI can do that, there’s utterly zero question they can implant software that would make it look like the operator of that PC visited and downloaded K porn. As destructive as the mere allegation that someone is involved with K porn is, I can’t imagine they lack the ability to attack someone that way.
You sir are correct.
MY point is that Democrats make wildly fantastic and unbelievable claims about stuff all the time (e.g., witness they hysteria over the potential coming decision on Roe v Wade).
MY point is that the FBI by the misbegotten reputation of its ‘integrity’ and lawfulness DOES NOT operate under the law. It chooses what it does based on politics - politics that are leftist and supports leftist goals, period.
Or to a jury mostly comprised of Christian ladies who already decided you were guilty as soon as they heard the word “porn” in the charges read against someone legal porn or not.
If I take the wrong umbrella when leaving a restaurant, although technically I did indeed take someone else’s umbrella, I don’t get charged with stealing if I can show I accidentally took one that looked like mine.
Right. Like the guys that are still in jail over January 6 even though the cops held the door open for them.
The FBI even tried to sucker Roger Stone into the January 6 event.
General Flynn is another example of what can happen when a corrupt cop and a corrupt prosecutor take a case to a corrupt judge.
In your case the cops would probably claim you swapped umbrella’s on purpose because you buy at Walmart and the one you wiped was a Gucci.
Absolutely. I tether to a phone as a modem for internet access. I have had my phone make a connection to my box and power it up trying to get in it twice in the middle of the night.
This means whoever it was had a deal for access with the phone carrier I was using at the time.
Why don’t you go to her website and familiarize yourself with the background:
https://sharylattkisson.com/category/blog/
You ask “Why haven’t others been hacked?” How can you know they haven’t? How do you know you haven’t?
How can we be sure we haven’t? Seriously, how do you search your os for such files, and how do you permanently erase all traces if you do?
The article tells you. I am seeing a pattern here with with some people and it is disturbing.
Where in the clicked link does it answer that oh disturbed one?
“How can we be sure we haven’t? Seriously, how do you search your os for such files, and how do you permanently erase all traces if you do?”
Absolutely...
The FBI better clear this through her superiors at Defense and CIA.
I believe Sharyl Atkinson is one of a handful of honest reporters we have. Thus, I believe what she is saying. On top of that, I’m sure the FBI could put ANYTHING on ANYBODY’s computer if they wanted to, including your.
So, I will give her the benefit of the doubt.
They are also commies pushing for the overthrow of the constitution and the Republic. IOW, domestic enemies of the constitution.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.