Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California under-21 gun sales ban ruled unconstitutional by US appeals court (9th Circuit)
foxnews ^ | 5/11/2022 | louis casiano

Posted on 05/11/2022 8:23:09 PM PDT by bitt

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, however, ruled that a hunting license requirement for purchases of rifles or shotguns by adults under 21 who are not in the military or law enforcement was reasonable

A U.S. appeals court on Wednesday ruled that California's ban on the sale of semiautomatic weapons to adults under 21 is unconstitutional, a move gun-rights advocates hope will pave the way for similar rulings in other courts.

The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the law violates the Second Amendment and that a San Diego judge should have blocked what is called the "an almost total ban on semiautomatic centerfire rifles" for young adults.

"America would not exist without the heroism of the young adults who fought and died in our revolutionary army," Judge Ryan Nelson wrote in the 2-1 ruling. "Today we reaffirm that our Constitution still protects the right that enabled their sacrifice: the right of young adults to keep and bear arms."

A dissent was written by U.S. District Court Judge Sidney Stein, who was assigned to the panel from the Southern District of New York.

The Firearms Policy Coalition, which brought the case, said the ruling makes it optimistic age-based gun bans will be overturned in other courts.

"Today’s decision confirms that peaceable legal adults cannot be prohibited from acquiring firearms and exercising their rights enshrined in the Second Amendment," FPC Vice President of Programs Adam Kraut said in a statement to Fox News. "We are pleased to see progress on this important legal front and optimistic that similar results will come from our many other challenges to age-based bans filed in courts across the United States."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: 2to1; 9thcircuit; banglist; california; clintonjudge; federalistsociety; jameslorenz; kennethklee; kennethlee; mjameslorenz; ninthcircuit; rapinbilljudge; ryandnelson; ryannelson; sdcalifornia; sdnewyork; seniorjudge; seniormomentjudge; sidneyhstein; sidneystein; trumpjudge; under21gunsales

1 posted on 05/11/2022 8:23:09 PM PDT by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; ...

p


2 posted on 05/11/2022 8:23:35 PM PDT by bitt ( <img src=' 'width=50%> )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Any other day this would be big headlines.


3 posted on 05/11/2022 8:24:34 PM PDT by Reno89519 (FJB. Respect America, Embrace America, Buy American, Hire American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

Ca will appeal to the full court and win and lose at the SC..again


4 posted on 05/11/2022 8:26:52 PM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bitt

But also a bad decision to say that they must have a hunting license to buy a firearm as if that is the only legit use of a long gun.


5 posted on 05/11/2022 8:27:39 PM PDT by Reno89519 (FJB. Respect America, Embrace America, Buy American, Hire American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Wait until it is appealed and the full court is impanelled.

It is still the 9th Circus of Appeals even with the judges President Trump put on this court.


6 posted on 05/11/2022 8:28:02 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

More comments from this earlier posting from a different source:
US appeals court rules California’s under-21 gun sales ban is unconstitutional
05/11/2022 3:08:01 PM PDT · by Deo volente · 19 replies
EyewitnessNews7 | May 11, 2022 | Brian Melley
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4062435/posts


7 posted on 05/11/2022 8:31:18 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (Get out of the matrix and get a real life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

Hopefully the Supreme Court, like may happen with Roe v Wade will decide that states can no longer infringe upon the constitution and invalidate federal, state, and local gun laws (offering that the alternative would be to allow restrictions on speech, etc.). Maybe this court can clear the decks on federal, state, and local laws that violate the constitution. Let everyone change the constitution, 2nd amendment, if they want different results.


8 posted on 05/11/2022 8:32:30 PM PDT by Reno89519 (FJB. Respect America, Embrace America, Buy American, Hire American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bitt

>>a hunting license requirement for purchases of rifles or shotguns by adults under 21

Are the hunting licenses “shall issue”? If not, Kali will just deny licenses to anyone under 21 to get the same effect.


9 posted on 05/11/2022 8:37:31 PM PDT by vikingd00d (chown -R us ~you/base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

“But also a bad decision to say that they must have a hunting license to buy a firearm as if that is the only legit use of a long gun.”

Yes, it’s absurd to tie gun ownership hunting. Second amendment isn’t about the right to hunt.


10 posted on 05/11/2022 9:33:32 PM PDT by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Cali couldn’t figure out the militia act of 1903 sets the age at 1, not that I would assert the 1903 act is constitutional. It has never been challenged.


11 posted on 05/12/2022 1:13:13 AM PDT by Salvavida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Just a thought ... if SCOTUS strikes the 21-to-buy-firearms law, shouldn’t they also strike down 21-to-drink laws?


12 posted on 05/12/2022 7:11:08 AM PDT by bassmaner (He y commies: I'm a white male, and guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

BTTT!
This is a great win!


13 posted on 05/12/2022 7:21:48 AM PDT by CodeToad (Arm up! They Have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt; All

Why was someone from the southern district of New York signed to thr (west coast) 9th circuit’s case?


14 posted on 05/12/2022 7:39:20 AM PDT by newzjunkey (“We Did It Joe!” -The Taliban / “Thanks Joe!” -Putin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bassmaner

There’s no explicit federal constitutional right to be drunk and stupid while there is an explicit right to keep and bear arms.


15 posted on 05/12/2022 7:41:36 AM PDT by newzjunkey (“We Did It Joe!” -The Taliban / “Thanks Joe!” -Putin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
Why was someone from the southern district of New York signed to the (west coast) 9th circuit’s case?

The Feds are testing a new method of "judge shopping".

16 posted on 05/12/2022 8:13:08 AM PDT by damper99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bitt

If kids can change their gender, they can have a gun.


17 posted on 05/12/2022 9:19:55 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (If science can’t be questioned, it’s not science anymore, it’s propaganda. --Aaron Rodgers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

“Floater” in the punchbowl.


18 posted on 05/13/2022 4:17:50 AM PDT by HKMk23 (https://youtu.be/LTseTg48568)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson