Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It Will Be Years Before Raytheon Can Build New Stinger Missiles
https://www.defenseone.com/business/2022/04/it-will-be-years-raytheon-can-build-new-stinger-missiles/366105/ ^

Posted on 04/28/2022 5:27:00 AM PDT by FarCenter

It will be years before Raytheon Technologies can build new Stinger shoulder-fired missiles due to a dwindling supply of weapons parts, the company’s CEO said Tuesday.

The U.S. has shipped Stingers to Ukraine’s military, which has used them to shoot down Russian aircraft. But there’s only a finite supply as Raytheon has not made Stinger missiles for the U.S. military in nearly two decades.

“We're going to have to go out and redesign some of the electronics in the missile and the seeker head,” Raytheon Technologies CEO Greg Hayes told investment analysts Tuesday during the company’s quarterly earnings call. “That's going to take us a little bit of time.”

The company has “a very limited stock of material for Stinger production,” Hayes said, as it's currently building a missile for a sole international customer.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: dod; gramsci; missiles; raytheon; raytheonlobbying; russia; stinger; treason; ukraine; warfooting; whoops
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: SaveFerris

A sling shots require a NFA license.


21 posted on 04/28/2022 5:53:56 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

Read...... the stingers are for export customers


22 posted on 04/28/2022 5:55:47 AM PDT by bert ( (KW?E. NP. N.C. +12) Promoting Afro Heritage diversity will destroy the democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FarCenter

Stinger has two shots, can only Lock on to vehicles (Killstreak rewards), and it locks on hella fast.

Javelin has one shot, can hit vehicles (with a slower lock on) and locations, allowing you to essentially have a Predator missile in a launcher. Also, with the launcher glitch, it makes a big boom.


23 posted on 04/28/2022 5:57:15 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FarCenter

I sooner suspect Raytheon has had project and funding cut due to Gov. deciding they have an oversupply of missiles. And this is their play to get back in the game and get new contracts.


24 posted on 04/28/2022 6:00:11 AM PDT by Marko413
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
We have nothing in our arsenal that can do what the Stinger missiles do?

The Stinger missile IS in our arsenal. We gave a bunch of them out of our inventory to Ukraine, and Raytheon is saying they can't manufacture replacements for a few years.

The lone export customer that they're building Stingers for now also provided Raytheon with key components that Raytheon can't source.

The last time the United States purchased Stinger missiles was in 2004...

25 posted on 04/28/2022 6:07:30 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Phoenix8

🤣🤨 No!


26 posted on 04/28/2022 6:23:40 AM PDT by Eagles6 (Welcome to the Matrix . Orwell's "1984" was a warning, not an instruction manual.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Phoenix8

“Biden administration surely would keep an adequate supply for ourselves?”

Sure, just like the strategic oil reserve.


27 posted on 04/28/2022 6:39:48 AM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: chopperk

And so?

It’s a corporation. What other motive should it have?


28 posted on 04/28/2022 6:47:58 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FarCenter

Our military facing a shortage of defense armaments like Stinger missiles?

Democrats are always happy when one of their plans comes together like this.


29 posted on 04/28/2022 6:56:48 AM PDT by Iron Munro ( Joe Biden - Inventor Of The First New Language since Esperanto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FarCenter

If Raytheon plays coy, and hard to get; drop ‘em! Give Elon Musk a call. He’ll supply them, with improved performance features.


30 posted on 04/28/2022 7:07:19 AM PDT by Tucker39 ("It is impossible so to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible." George Washington )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chopperk
Anything Raytheon does goes to the highest bidder. Their only motivation is money....

+1

31 posted on 04/28/2022 7:09:44 AM PDT by Allegra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: chopperk

Are you suggesting that Raytheon should have a “social conscience”?


32 posted on 04/28/2022 7:23:54 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FarCenter

Shoulder launched missiles are a growth industry. If stingers are not being built (btw it’s a 45 year old design), something else is.


33 posted on 04/28/2022 7:35:28 AM PDT by lurk (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

BINGO!!! Funny how Defense Industrial Base works.


34 posted on 04/28/2022 7:36:14 AM PDT by OHPatriot (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: FarCenter
Russia thanks us for our generosity. They can't wait to confiscate those German tanks!

.

.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/OzbHhX6X82qw/

35 posted on 04/28/2022 7:44:08 AM PDT by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FarCenter

In China, Xi reads this, nods, smiles...


36 posted on 04/28/2022 7:51:04 AM PDT by Demiurge2 (Define your terms!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

Yes; the whole arsenal. It sounds like a joke, but it isn’t. The US model is to create air dominance, that is, no enemy aircraft in the sky to bother the tanks and infantry. That means blasting their airfields, radar and SAMs, and promptly shooting down any of their aircraft that still dare to take off, using everything from AWACS, Patriot missiles, much better fighters, etc. all in an integrated air defense system.

Stingers were created for a scenario which in US planning should no longer exist, where the US has not gained air dominance and ground units needed their own air defense assets. That was a plausible scenario way back in the 1980’s when the Soviets had thousands of active aircraft available for battles in Germany.

But that situation simply went away. The US (and NATO) was left unchallenged in the air. Stingers didnt get much use in Iraq in 1991 or 2003. And if the Russians pick a fight with NATO now the betting is still that the US will remain unchallenged, and the Stingers will remain redundant.


37 posted on 04/28/2022 8:09:38 AM PDT by buwaya (Strategic imperatives )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FarCenter

It will be even more years before the Russians can build any targets for the missiles to hit.


38 posted on 04/28/2022 8:10:16 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Capitalism is what happens when you leave people alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Demiurge2

Xi’s problem is the US Navy and USAF, and they dont use Stingers. The last thing the Chinese need to worry about are manpads.


39 posted on 04/28/2022 8:12:33 AM PDT by buwaya (Strategic imperatives )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: FarCenter

The Stinger Block 1 missiles in the U.S. inventory are undergoing a Service Life Upgrade currently. No more Stingers will be manufactured for U.S. forces because a replacement program is underway at this time for a new missile with extended range and improved targeting. The first of the new missiles should be tested next year and first production is scheduled for 2004.

So there are improved Stingers in use now for U.S. forces and a better missile is in the works.


40 posted on 04/28/2022 8:30:09 AM PDT by Grognard49
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson