Finally, Levin called for Americans to follow the principles outlined in our Constitution and Declaration of Independence and reject “dangerous ideologies” like nationalism and Marxism.
To Levin, America First means America first to experience incoming ICBMs.
Levin admits he supports Nazis, child trafficking,
naked piano penis-players, sexual enslavement,
money laundering, child rape, adrenochrome selling,
and secret biowarfare made to enrich a few corrupt
Congressional families and China.
pathetique.
Thank God for Mark Levin. We need him to debate that ***hole Tucker who is turning “America First” into “Putin First.”
Well stated Great One
Maybe Levin could tell us why he is sticking his own head where he is.
One thing you have to give the America-hating Democrats credit for, is picking issues that they know will divide the opposition.
The great thing about America is that you get to be an idiot and still make millions of dollars.
Very well stated by Mr. Levin.
Now, he may want to remove that omnipresent Lincoln image from hovering over his head on his television show.
Lincoln didn’t believe in the Tenth Amendment.
Mark Levin is a smart guy. But the Ukraine war is a European problem, not an American problem. So I believe I’ll heed George Washington over Mark Levin here: avoid foreign entanglements.
Side note: This is not to justify or ignore Russia’s invasion. Putin is a war criminal. But he’s Europe’s problem, not ours.
Head out of the sand and eyes wide open means asking what corrupt deals has Jao Bai-din been a part of in Ukraine, especially since he openly bragged about getting a prosecutor fired who was looking into his illegal activities with Burisma Holdings.
“Instead, Levin argued, “America first” means responding to global atrocities like Russia’s war with Ukraine, to stop another world war from happening.”
Show me where in the Constitution it says we can send billions of dollars in weaponry to the Ukraine.
Let’s just be honest. We are way beyond our Constitution with Ukraine, we are way beyond our Constitution in printing money to buy weapons to send to them. We are way beyond our Constitution in failing to hold our President accountable for outright bribery sourced in Ukraine.
The Constitution says nothing about fighting wars beyond our borders to either support or oppose tyrants, beyond those we fought for our freedom. Yet we’ve supported and opposed many tyrants just over the past 20 years.
Our straying from the Constitution is as much a cause of the threat of renewed world war as anything that Russia has done in Ukraine. We squandered our treasure, our blood, and now our credibility over the past 20 years, and the whole world will pay.
No Mark, we are not Constitutionally obligated to do anything in Ukraine. I would argue it’s the opposite. But we are involved there anyway, we are sending weapons. You can argue if it’s the morally correct thing to do, it may or may not be so. But don’t tell me we are Constitutionally obligated. Levin is going full leftist by asserting things are guaranteed in the Constitution when they are not.
Sticking your nose in other people’s business isn’t any better than sticking your head in the sand. America is being invaded RIGHT now and we have no money. Short of launching nukes at us Russia isn’t a threat to America and invading the ukraine isn’t our business. We invade places all the time for a lot less reasons.
He doesn’t get that people born with foreign nationality are not natural born citizens.
That was the entire purpose of it being put in the Constitution.
John Jay to George Washington:
“Permit me to hint, whether it would be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Command in Chief of the American army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.”
What hogwash. I remember when Mark said people wanting a convention of the states were crazy until he realized it was the brilliant. And then he wrote a book about something he would hang up on callers about just a few years earlier.
America first doesn’t mean isolationism, populism or a giant federal government advocate. Mark pulls the Obama technique of deploying straw man arguments to avoid a legitimate discussion.
So what does America First mean to me?
It means if we want to help others we must be able to stand on our. Be self reliant. Our foundation must be built on rock. Not on shifting sand of incredible debt at 133% of our GDP.
We are $30 trillion in debt. All because we have helped Kuwait, Iraq, Afghanistan, and other countries experience their own liberty for our “safety”.
We have made “public servants” helping liberate others around the world richer than anytime in the history of the world. All while giving up our freedoms.
I can’t fault Mark. Like any good attorney he is being paid by his employer to dress up a new war under anything that will help it sell. He has chosen the auspice of liberty.
How about we fix our financial and social issues first? And then we can be stronger when helping others. No one is even arguing we could isolate ourselves from the rest of the world. That is just another Neocon talking point.
That is what America First means to me.
Perfectly logical arguments.
Then, after Trump was elected he jumped on the Trump money train.
Then the little bastard, hypocrite, self proclaimed protector of the Constitution clammed up (with Fox News) Nov.2020 on election fraud. And has been silent on it since...How do I know? Fox hasn't fired him yet.
American first aDOES NOT MEAN BEING THE WORLD’S FREE MILITARY SERVICE.
NeoCon mouthpiece.
When did Levin serve?
Constellis, formerly Blackwater, is paying mercs.
He and his entire family should sign up.
Levin thinks he knows better than both George Washington and Dwight D. Eisnhower.
The way I see it is we should follow the emBASEee strategee. Very AmericaFirsty.
The Budapest Agreement was an “accession” to a signed international United Nations, ratified nuclear nonproliferation treaty. The Ukes honored it and gave up those nukes. The Rukes violated it twice by invading twice, by happenstance it was when there were weak-kneed democrap presidents in office whom Vlad knew would not do anything about an invasion. And the USA has been looking for all kinds of ways to abrogate our responsibility in this treaty/agreement even though it points to disaster down the road for nuclear nonproliferation.
So when I say give back the Ukes their nukes, it is an acknowledgement that nukes are sovereignty. They gave up some nukes in exchange for “assurances” for borders and sovereignty. Since they are in an existential war, who are we to scold them for building nukes since that is what we did when we were in our existential war, and we are the ones who have betrayed them.
If the Ukes develop and deploy a suitcase nuke on a Russian city, it is because they got pushed into an existential corner. What we really should be doing is putting CONVENTIONAL forces into this fight in a way that genuinely “assures” borders and sovereignty for a country that did the right thing. After all, the Russian bear has been shown to be rather toothless compared to what most of us thought they would be in this fight, so the US would kick some serious @$$.
And if we send in American boots on the ground, we damned well better be negotiating American Land as the thing to fight for. Big, sweeping American EmBASEees along the border between Russia and Ukraine. A Lend Lease project. Americans fighting for American land. For generations we could use that land to build airports and fight terrorism in that region. I would call it the BBudapest AAgreement LLend LLease program because it would take BALLs.
from my home page
I have been advocating for several years a policy I call ‘embaseees’. Embassy + AirBase —> EmBASEeees. We go into a terrorist country, clear out their taliban equivalent, then withdraw to very large Embassies, perhaps 3 of them. Have them big enough to encompass a military airbase where we can use it for decades on end to conduct anti-terrorism operations. As long as the ‘host’ country aint killing Americans then we let them have self-sovereignty. Kind of like how we operated in the Phillipines for decades. We could even have an intermediate zone that we patrol but it would be autonomous. Let them have their taste of freedom. A referendum every 10 years to see how large the boundaries of the intermediate autonomous zone should be.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4043681/posts
__________________________________________________________