Skip to comments.
January 6 Defendant Gloriously Acquitted — Is His Defense the Roadmap for Other Peaceful Protesters to Win Back Their Freedom?
The Liberty Daily ^
| Apr. 6, 2022
| J.D. Rucker
Posted on 04/06/2022 3:58:40 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Yes. It’s totalitarianism. Political persecution.
Years and huge amounts of money to prosecute misdemeanors.
2
posted on
04/06/2022 4:02:26 PM PDT
by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Sadly, if a defendant is in the court of a Rat Judge, this “roadmap” will be completely ineffective along with any other defense. In those courts, these cases are guilty not until proven innocent, just guilty. Also know as Star Chambers or Kangaroo Courts.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
You remember how right wingers use to say, it’s coming to America soon.
Well, it has come and here we are...seemingly powerless to do anything about it..?
4
posted on
04/06/2022 4:06:39 PM PDT
by
Leep
(Freedom: "What's the big deal" -joe biden)
Invitation -- freely offered by nothing less than the Capitol's legal enforcement authority, the USCP -- is an absolute defense to Federal trespass.
5
posted on
04/06/2022 4:10:06 PM PDT
by
StAnDeliver
(Enjoy the goosestepping parade of Putlim Soviet c!rclejerkers lining up for the Tedlim-style putsch )
To: rigelkentaurus
6
posted on
04/06/2022 4:13:38 PM PDT
by
sauropod
(So may we start? It's time to start.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I read elsewhere that this was a bench trial. What happened to having a jury trial? Or would a jury in Washington DC be too politically biased.
7
posted on
04/06/2022 4:22:13 PM PDT
by
magooey
(The Mandate of Heaven resides in the hearts of men.)
To: magooey
I worked in DC. It would be like being judged by a jury of Jerry Springer guests.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“... Are we not supposed to listen to the instructions of law enforcement?”
Reliance on instructions from a government official is one of the cases in which ignorance of the law IS an excuse in the NY Penal Code.
9
posted on
04/06/2022 4:34:06 PM PDT
by
Eleutheria5
(January 6, worst assault on democracy since the Reichstag Fire)
To: magooey
"I read elsewhere that this was a bench trial. What happened to having a jury trial? Or would a jury in Washington DC be too politically biased."Drew the golden ticket in a Trump judge who is actually qualified to be a judge. You would trade that away for a jury of DC ferals?
10
posted on
04/06/2022 4:35:52 PM PDT
by
StAnDeliver
(Enjoy the goosestepping parade of Putlim Soviet c!rclejerkers lining up for the Tedlim-style putsch )
To: magooey
This should never reach a jury. When there’s no triable issue of facts, summary judgment is called for. And getting let in by the Capitol Police is grounds for at least partial summary judgment, and dismissal provided one behaved lawfully while in the Capitol.
11
posted on
04/06/2022 4:38:06 PM PDT
by
Eleutheria5
(January 6, worst assault on democracy since the Reichstag Fire)
To: ifinnegan
Can he sue for false incarceration now ?
To: magooey
Bench trial with a Trump appointed judge is the best shot as DC jurors are by definition biased communists .
13
posted on
04/06/2022 5:02:36 PM PDT
by
BigEdLB
(Let’s go Brandon!)
To: rigelkentaurus
This case the defendant got lucky.
judge Trevor McFadden Appointed by Donald Trump
14
posted on
04/06/2022 5:36:06 PM PDT
by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“Was it all a con because they knew they had no real cases against most of the defendants?”
Yep, it’s the classic DA strategy to threaten a really long sentence to scare the defendants into accept a plea deal.
15
posted on
04/06/2022 6:03:33 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Inside every liberal is a blood-thirsty fascist yearning to be free of current societal constraints.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
It was a bench trial before a judge who had found another defendant guilty in a different trial. So it’s hard to see a legal tactic in this.
To: StAnDeliver
In our legal system, the process is half the punishment, or in this case, all of the punishment!
17
posted on
04/06/2022 6:45:38 PM PDT
by
Bshaw
(A nefarious deceit is upon us all!)
To: StAnDeliver
And now there is standing precedent.
18
posted on
04/06/2022 6:48:03 PM PDT
by
Bshaw
(A nefarious deceit is upon us all!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Was it all a con because they knew they had no real cases against most of the defendants?That must be a rhetorical question. :)
19
posted on
04/06/2022 8:18:58 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Is it time for a general strike yet?)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Thank. God.
One. ONE decent judge in DC. They are known to be the guardians of Democrats there. I mean it is really, really bad, according to lawyers.
Years and years of the Uniparty rubber stamping lib justices in DC. Elsewhere, it’s not as bad, as often a Senator will axe lunatics behind the scenes, for their own territories. But DC has nobody from our side lookinout for Patriots.
It’s also high profile area, the highest, so judges go out of their way to loudly hammer deplorables.
So good for this one!
20
posted on
04/06/2022 8:20:19 PM PDT
by
Basket_of_Deplorables
(Putin is behaving rationally.The war is on Biden and Obama. )
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson