Posted on 04/04/2022 5:02:12 PM PDT by Rummyfan
So-called Republican Sens. Lisa Murkowski and Mitt Romney both announced their intentions to support Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s confirmation to the Supreme Court. This makes three Republican turncoats who are supporting the nomination of the notoriously weak-on-crime Jackson, whose shameful record of leniency in sentencing child pornographers, apparently didn’t faze them.
“After multiple in-depth conversations with Judge Jackson and deliberative review of her record and recent hearings, I will support her historic nomination to be an Associate Justice on the U.S. Supreme Court,” Murkowski said in a statement.
Romney called Jackson “a well-qualified jurist and a person of honor.”
“While I do not expect to agree with every decision she may make on the Court, I believe that she more than meets the standard of excellence and integrity,” Romney added.
I’m sure child pornographers nationwide agree.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
Romney wants to run for President in 2024. Murkowski is setting up the same election strategy she used last time - lose the Republican primary, win as a write in candidate with Democrat support. Collins is still apologizing for voting for Brett Kavanaugh.
No, I am not surprised.
Which Democrats are voting against her?
Oh they’re interested already, just not the way we WANT them to be interested.
Better start taking up a collection to contract with Blackwater for the protection of Thomas and family...
They LBJ’d Scalia a few years ago...
If they get rid of the last man standing, the communists will have a guaranteed 6-3 majority on any case that reduces a citizen’s freedom & liberty...
They should be expelled from the party. They have forfeited the honor of putting an R by their name.
I agree.
LOL!
They are NOT Republicans, Turncoats or RHINOS. They are implanted Democrats doing what they were hired to do. Does anyone think it is a coincidence that just about EVERY significant bill or issue, they stand with the DEMOCRATS?
R.I.N.O.T.U.R.D.S. Karma, we’re depending on you!
No, they can get a tie in committee to the floor and there aren’t filibusters on SCOTUS nominees any more.
It’s done.
Might still get . Who knows
60
Yeah, I know….but he thinking about it. :)
Why not everything else is effed up.
Well, he could run as a Democrat.
These 4 squishy R-senators were “let out of the vote” because of the filibuster. Their intention to confirm is just words. The Dems don’t have 60 votes.
Murkowski voted “present” on Kavanaugh (and voted no on advancing him out of committee) and Collins voted no on Barrett.
They happily lapped up voting for Brown because they are subversives not Republicans.
Claims she doesn’t know what a woman is
Then
18 year old perv chomp and 8 year old victim are ‘ peers’
Then
Inalienable rights
aren’t
a legal precept
but a religiouse one
Next
Seperation of church and state
means
inalienable rights are unconstitutional
Ergo
there are no inalienable rights
.
And all those s.o.b.’s stand g around all proud of them selves.
.this b!tch means to enslave us.
18 year old perv CHOMO
and 8 year old victim
.are ‘ peers’
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.