Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/14/2022 9:09:34 AM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: knighthawk
looked... LOOKED??? WTF???
2 posted on 01/14/2022 9:10:22 AM PST by Chode (there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. #FJB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

That’s when she knew they were all against her!


3 posted on 01/14/2022 9:10:50 AM PST by \/\/ayne (I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Good thing our enemies won’t be out to get her, so they will give her a pass too.


4 posted on 01/14/2022 9:14:22 AM PST by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

There is no woman who could pass the actual test. Today’s female SF have had the same benefit as those who benefited from Affirmative Action, IOW, putting people in places they have no business being just to shut up some naggers.


5 posted on 01/14/2022 9:15:04 AM PST by bk1000 (Banned from Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

She’s under the impression it’s a lark for the guys, it’s only
hard for the girls, and they pile it on for them.

If she can’t make it, it’s unfair.

LOL

There’s guys with attitudes like this too, so it isn’t only
women.

Not everyone can pass these tests. They want to draw from
the group of men who can withstand conditions that are not
tolerable by everyone. The enemy will.


8 posted on 01/14/2022 9:23:07 AM PST by DoughtyOne (I pledge allegience to the flag of the U S of A, and to the REPUBLIC for which it stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Looks like the USAF is memory-holing images of Lt Mosby from their sites but it turns out she has at least two degrees of "intersectionality"(black, female). I knew something was up when the Daily Mail didn't include a photo of the article's subject.

9 posted on 01/14/2022 9:23:58 AM PST by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

If special forces training was easy, women and minorities would be enrolled.............. OH wait never mind.


12 posted on 01/14/2022 9:34:08 AM PST by shoff (Vote Democrat it beats thinking!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Here’s a 150 pound bodysack. Carry it up that mountain. You’ve got 4 hours, go.


13 posted on 01/14/2022 9:45:39 AM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
Chuck Yeager took a stand against this crap while he was Commandant of the USAF test pilot/Astronaut school at Edwards AFB, in the 1960's.

The Kennedy administration told him there will be a black astronaut, Ed Dwight. Well, academically and performance wise Dwight didn't finish high enough in the class to qualify. So, according to Gen Yeager, the Kennedy's and their justice department told him Dwight Will be an astronaut anyway.

Yeager steadfastly refused saying that others in his class finished ahead of Dwight and deserved to proceed to astronaut training before Dwight was considered.

Finally the outcome was that all classmates ahead of Dwight and Dwight himself would graduate and become astronaut candidates.

When is the last time you have heard about a military commander standing up for his men against politicians that way?

14 posted on 01/14/2022 9:47:50 AM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Wow.


15 posted on 01/14/2022 9:48:27 AM PST by redgolum (If this is civilization, I will be the barbarian. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

I am of the opinion that all military jobs should be classified as either:

Combat
Combat support
Support

And three physical fitness tests are needed, one for each. The least taxing would be support (push ups, run/speed walk, situps). If you can not complete this test, you are not fit for military service.

To this baseline, there would be added the new requirement of “sand bags”. This would require the placement of two sand bags, separated by two lines 50 feet apart. The sandbags would weigh 25 lbs. The test would require the picking up of a sand bag, running to the other line. Putting down the sand bag, picking up the other bag and returning to the original line. This would be completed 10 times and would be a timed exercise. This test simulates the repetitive up/down nature of many tasks within the military.

The combat level test would add two elements. A pull-up requirement and a squat requirement. Combat operations often require the upper body strength demonstrated by the pull-up and the leg strength required by the squat.

In order to remain “fit” for your duty job / MOS, you would have to complete and pass the minimum score for your jobs classification. If you can not pass the fitness test, you are allowed a short period to get into shape and test again. Two failures would require reclassification or medical evaluation.

No male vs female scoring - one test standard.


17 posted on 01/14/2022 10:02:24 AM PST by taxcontrol (The choice is clear - either live as a slave on your knees or die as a free citizen on your feet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Non-PC recap:

Woman tries to get into Spec-Ops. Fails to meet standards. Standards get lowered to let her through. She keeps failing to complete aspects of the school. Is allowed to retry. She then claims that command set her up to fail by giving her the appearance of special treatment. That while standards were lowered, that had nothing to do with her scores.

The future warriors...


22 posted on 01/14/2022 10:18:58 AM PST by Bogey78O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
She quit twice in water confidence sessions and once during land navigation training, the letter claims, and soon, she 'became known for quitting and getting preferential treatment.'

I wonder why she became known as a quitter?

23 posted on 01/14/2022 10:20:44 AM PST by libertylover (Our BIGGEST problem, by far, is that most of the media is hate & agenda driven, not truth driven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Women should not be in combat. Women should not serve with men in combat.


28 posted on 01/14/2022 10:31:02 AM PST by JoanSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Instructors are out to get EVERYBODY!


30 posted on 01/14/2022 10:41:44 AM PST by MattMusson (Sometimes the wind blows too much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Why do physical standards need to be lowered for women? They keep telling us they are strong, independent and just as good (or better) than men.


32 posted on 01/14/2022 11:44:27 AM PST by Trillian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Not surprised. In 1987, we had a black female Captain in my AF Squadron who could not run the annual 1.5 mile physical test in the time required. And you could practically walk it in the required time then. She always got a pass.


33 posted on 01/14/2022 11:46:42 AM PST by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Is this a real female or a tranny?


38 posted on 01/14/2022 2:34:59 PM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Ladies, even those crossgender male trannies don’t make it in SF or Ranger School.


40 posted on 01/14/2022 6:34:08 PM PST by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
Some day she's gonna get a lot of men killed because of her inadequacies.
41 posted on 01/15/2022 1:16:36 AM PST by Doc91678 (Doc91678)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson