Posted on 12/19/2021 3:15:07 PM PST by RomanSoldier19
On Sunday, Republican Florida Governor Ron DeSantis appeared on Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures” with host Maria Bartiromo to discuss issues related to COVID-19.
During the segment, Bartiromo spoke with DeSantis about the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals dissolving the stay on the Biden administration’s vaccine and test mandate for private employers.
“…an appeals court on Friday allowed President Biden’s vaccine mandate for private employers to take effect as New York and California are reimposing these mask mandates,” Bartiromo said. “It looks like this is going to the Supreme Court.”
DeSantis responded, saying that he thought the 6th Circuit made a “terrible decision.”
“I do think we’re going to get positive relief from the U.S. Supreme Court on that,” the governor stated. “But Maria, what we did in Florida is we didn’t leave it to chance. We passed substantive protections in a special session for Floridians so that they are able to have generous ability to opt out of these types of mandates.”
DeSantis continued, noting the importance of winning the case at the Supreme Court:
(Excerpt) Read more at dailywire.com ...
Toilet paper is how the progressives use the Constitution.
Massive Expansion Of Federal Power
I have zero hope that the SCOTUS will uphold the rights of citizens not to get injected with chemicals by their government at the government’s whim.
IF a citizen does not have control over what goes into his body the citizen is NOT free
He is a slave to the State.
Rebellion is brewing my FRiends!
Nullification, we don’t have to listen to the Supreme court, if they don’t rule properly. At some point a line in the sand against the federal govt has to be drawn.
He should threaten to Expel All Federal Employee’s from the State
the issue is what to do if the Supremes bail
I agree. The SCOTUS has long been far more driven by the doctrine of stare decisis than by the Constitution and the clear expressed intent of its authors. In my opinion, stare decisis is just idiotic, because if an error in judgment is made, and then depended upon as “precedent”, that error becomes compounded and magnified as the doctrine of stare decisis locks in the error and forces future courts to promulgate that error.
Of course, leftists have relied upon this doctrine for much of their twisting of the Constitution on the road to implementing their agenda. They first invent a non-existent constitutional “right”, and then cast the Constitution aside and build a wall around their legal contrivance to prevent any further scrutiny of it, and that wall is called “stare decisis.”
I don’t trust them at all. The best we see in our favor is 5-4. Really doubt it. Trumps picks have sucked so far.
Whatever comes after tarring and feathering.
DeSantis for President in 2024.
With this 24/7/365 health affecting mandate nose under the tent, your diet and weight is next up. Then your shopping choices, then you travel choices, then your entertainment choices, then “dangerous” sports choices, then thoughts you have.
What now?
Assault the left wing with such strong opposition they take to their offices and hide under their desks.
Nancy Pelosi should be harassed everywhere she goes. She should know no peace for Christmas
I know an OSHA inspector in a large city, he says they don’t have the manpower now to do the daily’s let alone this
If they can hire 80,000 IRA agents, they can hire more at OSHA.
I agree about stare decisis leading to compounded errors. It reminds me of the baseball Hall of Fame argument. If Harold Baines, a pretty good ballplayer, is in, then we have to let in a whole bunch of pretty good ballplayers who were just as good. And it becomes the Hall of Pretty Good.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.