[Wish2Post]

The next assault on our freedom to vax or not vax.

Why no one would be safe with such a law:

"The bill could, essentially, wipe all health insurance off the books for unvaccinated people. The vaccinated should take no comfort from this, because their vaccinated status is entirely temporary, and subject to rules that could change on a whim. Once you start putting stipulations on healthcare, you don’t stop."

[ought-six]

Democrats are, at the very least, fascists. If they thought they could get away with it they would trot out the cattle cars and start transporting “the others” to concentration camps.

[Freedom56v2]

So US citizens who pay for insurance would not be covered?

Yet illegals who surge the border are?

[Muhammy]

Let me guess, AA crowd?

[blackdog]

Then smokers. Then fat people. Then alcoholics. Then homeschoolers. Then Republicans. Then democrats who are pro life. Then democrats who say "no" to authorized requests.

Those people are an enormous burden and cost to the system.

[Codeflier]

Yes. Do you eat read meat? No coverage. Do you smoke? No coverage. Do you drink alcohol? No coverage. On and on it could go.

[Leep]

I assume when they say Illinois they mean Chicago?

[Flavious_Maximus]

But homosexuals who continue to have unprotected risky sex can still get covered if they get HIV AIDS.

Some animals are more equal than others.

[Lurker]

Can we do this with AIDS?

L

[Mr. Jeeves]

The bill could, essentially, wipe all health insurance off the books for unvaccinated people.

Too late - Obamacare pretty much did that already. Only the indigent are eligible for full coverage. /s

[ferret_airlift]

You know, that’s a fantastic point.

Consider: This passes. Pope of Science Fauci declares that 3 shots are needed to be considered vaxxed. Overnight, how many lose coverage?

[Dead Corpse]

“Turn your healthcare over to the government... what’s the worst that could happen?”

Here’s your sign.

[BookmanTheJanitor]

Jonathan Carroll

[Magnum44]

And these are the same azzholes that want universal health care?

[Little Ray]

Y’know, if paying for their own treatment allowed them to choose Ivermectin, HCQ, and/or Monoclonal Antibodies (MAB) for treatment, it might not be a completely bad thing.

[bk1000]

Well, federal law says you must have health insurance. Methinks Illinois is a bit full of itself. These “leaders” are going to find themselves in a bad way at some point.

[McGavin999]

They have exposed their evil souls and they will never be able to hide that again. The whole world now knows what they are.

[Jim Robinson]

Kinda blows healthcare is a ‘right.’

[digger48]

Does this include a certain demographic that get medicaid?

[alancarp]

Less than a decade ago the Democrat message was ‘let’s make sure everyone can get health care... regardless of any pre-existing conditions’.

Now it’s ‘we will strip away health care because you failed to comply with our mandate on this very narrow-defined/singular action.’

(But smokers? Drug abuser? Any risky sexual behavior? Y’all come on in to the clinic!)

[Pajamajan]

""The bill could, essentially, wipe all health insurance off the books for unvaccinated people. The vaccinated should take no comfort from this, because their vaccinated status is entirely temporary, and subject to rules that could change on a whim. Once you start putting stipulations on healthcare, you don’t stop."

And the POS pushing this outrageous Bill has Cadillac premium insurance fully paid for by taxpayers, including unvaxxed taxpayers 😡. Criminal.

How much in kickbacks is this azzhole getting from Big Pharma?