Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ask ST: What happens if I am unvaccinated and get infected with Covid-19? (From Singapore Newspaper)
The Straits Times ^ | Published 7 hours ago | Joyce Teo Senior Health Correspondent

Posted on 12/08/2021 10:40:55 AM PST by entropy12

SINGAPORE - From Wednesday (Dec 8), those who are unvaccinated "by choice" against Covid-19 and become infected will have to pay for their own treatment. We answer some questions you may have on this topic. Q: Does the rule apply to those who are already hospitalised before Dec 8?

A: This will apply to all unvaccinated Covid-19 patients admitted on or after Dec 8, 2021, to hospitals and Covid-19 treatment facilities. The Covid-19 medical bills for those who are ineligible for vaccination, such as children under 12 years old or those who cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons, will still be fully paid for by the Government. Q: I have received one dose of the vaccine. Do I have to pay for treatment if I am hospitalised for Covid-19 before the second dose?

A: No. The authorities have said those who are partially vaccinated will not be charged until Dec 31 to allow them time to be fully vaccinated.

(Excerpt) Read more at straitstimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: covid; singapore; vaccine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-165 next last
To: higgmeister

I’m with your wife. When Pfizer got FDA approval, I got one shot. Zero side effects, not even a sore injection site.

But then Prez of Pfizer was appointed to some leadership role in the FDA. Did not pass the smell test, so I bought a book on AMZ about the rotten, lousy, useless, lying cheating FDA.

Not getting second shot of anything


121 posted on 12/08/2021 9:35:58 PM PST by Veto! (Political Correctness Offends Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: BlueMondaySkipper
Has your addled brain considered that the ones who had serious side effects might just be avoiding a follow-up jab or be dead and won’t be standing in line for an encore? I find it hard to think anyone is this stupid, but here you are, blowing up the curve.

Aw, there you go, using common sense with the vax shill.

122 posted on 12/08/2021 11:49:03 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Bikkuri

I’ll boost the percentage and say that
100% of us are going to die. And I will,
without fear, accept that fact.


123 posted on 12/08/2021 11:52:39 PM PST by Lean-Right (Eat More Moose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: bagster

“I look and you, and understand.”

Yep


124 posted on 12/09/2021 1:01:25 AM PST by SecAmndmt (Cv19 vaccines are Phase 2 of the CCP bioweapon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

You are pushing a “vaccine”...which does grant immunity...for a nasty cold virus...with a +97% recovery rate....and you believe you are sane.. I beg to differ...


125 posted on 12/09/2021 1:53:38 AM PST by Crim (Palin / West '16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Lean-Right

I can’t disagree with that ;)


126 posted on 12/09/2021 2:12:50 AM PST by Bikkuri (I am proud to be a PureBlood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: entropy12; Jane Long
And I should have complete freedom to avoid mingling with unvaxed people.

Hark back to a different time and place....

And I should have complete freedom to avoid mingling with black people.

And I should have complete freedom to avoid mingling with Jewish people.

Are you picking up what I'm putting down?

#EnjoyYourCruise


127 posted on 12/09/2021 2:48:33 AM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: BlueMondaySkipper; entropy12
You are one stinking piece of excrement.

Why he gotta be a piece? Why can't he be the whole thing?


128 posted on 12/09/2021 3:40:28 AM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
The crap they've produce ARE NOT VACCINES!

Changing the definition is meaningless.

129 posted on 12/09/2021 7:12:07 AM PST by G Larry (The "Racism" charge is code for "No Intelligent Argument")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke; entropy12
Wife has had to buy bra’s two sizes bigger since her vaccinations.

Same thing happened to me with my hats.

130 posted on 12/09/2021 7:22:29 AM PST by JonPreston (Q: Never have so many, been so wrong, so often)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Crim

Crim wrote: “I guess you missed the part of how it started..action T4”

You’re delusional.


131 posted on 12/09/2021 9:22:18 AM PST by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: BlueMondaySkipper

lueMondaySkipper wrote: “It’s a fact that they changed the definition of vaccine during covid. Is this news to you? No concern about changing a long standing definition? Do you also have no concern that they changed the way deaths are counted? Nothing to see here?”

There were logical reasons to change the definition. The change from immunity to protection is far less important than the anti-vaxxers would like you to believe. No vaccine in history has provided immunity if you define that as 100% effective in preventing infections.


132 posted on 12/09/2021 9:32:27 AM PST by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

“There were logical reasons to change the definition.”

Sure...the most obvious of which is to cover their ass.

Liberals are quite fond of this Orwellian linguistic nonsense...as though words are magic and can change reality...

The reality is the mRNA cocktail doesn’t produce immunity from covid...period

“The change from immunity to protection is far less important than the anti-vaxxers would like you to believe.”

Protection from a largely asymptomatic cold virus...uh huh..

No...it’s clear proof that the CDC has a political agenda and had to change a century old definition to cover it’s as because it became obvious that the covid chemical cocktail doesn’t work.

“No vaccine in history has provided immunity if you define that as 100% effective in preventing infections.”

Non sequitur: this so called vaccine prevents 0% infections, reinfections, or transmission of covid.

Evidenced by the need for perpetual boosters which in turn generate billions in profit for big pharm...which is now claiming a need for yearly or 6 month boosters...FOREVER.


133 posted on 12/09/2021 10:59:11 AM PST by Crim (Palin / West '16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

They are trying to eliminate the control group. They are trying to hide the superiority of natural immunity.

If you don’t get the vaccine, prepare to get covid and have what you need to treat it naturally. I had it and was pretty sick, but never needed medical help at all. I had everything including the tabletop nebulizer. I was ready. I was healthy and already not deficient in D or magnesium.


134 posted on 12/09/2021 11:02:06 AM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

“You’re delusional.”

I’m not the one in denial of well documented historical facts.


135 posted on 12/09/2021 11:05:41 AM PST by Crim (Palin / West '16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

Ahh, you vax shills, Branch Covidians, or whatever term is best, are quite the crew.

Did you know they ALSO changed the definition of anti-vaxers?

You are either a stupid moron or you’re working for the swamp. Which is it? There is no need EVER to change this type of definition. Changing definitions of well known terms only serves to confuse people and muddy the waters. Liberal do this all the time, and look at you, following along.

They changed the definition of vaccine
They changed the definition of vaccination
They changed the definition of anita-vaxer
They changed the definition of what constitutes dying from a disease
They are in the process of changing the defined what constitutes being “fully vaccinated” from covid (17th booster required soon!)

Does NONE of this cause either of your brain cells to fire up and start questioning things? Do/should laws and rules written under the old definitions still apply? Of course not. If they changed the definition of murder to the current definition of jaywalking, does crossing the street in the middle of the block now become a capital offense? It does by your flawed standards and logic.

If you were to borrow some curiosity form a higher life form, you would grasp that they make these changes because the old ones don’t fit what they are doing, and they want to fool the rubes. You know, people like you. And the funny thing is that the dullest ones aren’t able to catch on.


136 posted on 12/09/2021 12:31:58 PM PST by BlueMondaySkipper (Involuntarily subsidizing the parasite class since 1981)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Crim

Crim wrote: “Protection from a largely asymptomatic cold virus...uh huh..”

That ‘asymptomatic’ cold virus has killed more than 700,000 Americans.

Crim wrote: “Non sequitur: this so called vaccine prevents 0% infections, reinfections, or transmission of covid.”

This vaccine has saved hundreds of thousands lives. The covid death toll is approximately 1800 Americans every day. today. Despite your hyperbolic anti-vaxxer rhetoric those are the facts.


137 posted on 12/09/2021 12:36:24 PM PST by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

Anecdotal on your part with a sample size of 1.


138 posted on 12/09/2021 12:53:25 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

It’s a question of ‘when, not if’ the definition of fully vaccinated is changed to include a further shot, Fauci says

https://www.businessinsider.com/anthony-fauci-when-not-if-definition-fully-vaccinated-change-2021-12

3 shots

Pfizer CEO Bourla: We May Need Fourth Dose of Vaccine Sooner Because of Omicron

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2021/12/09/pfizer-ceo-bourla-we-may-need-fourth-dose-of-vaccine-sooner-because-of-omicron/

No 4 shots

Moderna says COVID booster, like flu vaccine, could be yearly
Moderna Chairman Noubar Afeyan also discusses the development of a single vaccine that combines COVID booster with flu shot

https://www.foxbusiness.com/healthcare/moderna-chairman-covid-vaccine-flu-shot

No its shots for the rest of your life.

And you will do it...without question...out of craven fear for a cold virus with a 95%+ recovery rate.

“That ‘asymptomatic’ cold virus has killed more than 700,000 Americans”

Yeah...that works out to a 95+% recovery rate....for a largely asymptomatic virus.

“This vaccine has saved hundreds of thousands lives.”

How so?....the recovery rate has remained unchanged from the outbreak.

Again...its largely asymptomatic...has a very high recovery rate.

We know the vax doesn’t grant immunity....so the claim now is the vax makes the symptoms milder...for a largely asymptomatic virus...with a 95+% recovery rate....

The claim the jab is responsible for what was already occurring pre vax is laughable...you cant prove the vaccine vax saved any lives...but you did prove the vax are still getting sick.

“The covid death toll is approximately 1800 Americans every day. today. Despite your hyperbolic anti-vaxxer rhetoric those are the facts.”

Purely emotional response...and completely untrue...I told you...I had my vaccines which granted immunity to several diseases as have my kids...you are left with name calling because you have no logical counter argument...so you leap to emotional rhetoric.

Get ready for your yearly shots pal...😂


139 posted on 12/09/2021 1:53:19 PM PST by Crim (Palin / West '16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Pendergast

Ditto all that!!


140 posted on 12/09/2021 2:01:24 PM PST by Osage Orange (1961 VW Two Door Truck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-165 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson