[ConservativeMind]

It was not for donors. It was just for Salvation Army members.

[Magnum44]

Doesn’t matter. Go woke, go broke.

[Wilderness Conservative]

Makes no difference. The SA is screwed.

[spacejunkie2001]

LOL

[TigersEye]

So what?

[rlmorel]

For many of us, that is a distinction without a difference, as you can probably guess.

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

It was not for donors. It was just for Salvation Army members.

Irrelevant.

If the SA wants to push racist teachings on it's members I will no longer support them.

[BlueLancer]

It was not for donors. It was just for Salvation Army members.

This is from appendix D: "• Denial of racism. We must stop denying the existence of individual and systemic/ institutional racism. They exist, and are still at work to keep White Americans in power."

When an organization starts talking about systemic/instituional racism, they're a lost cause; especially when they also talk about "keeping White Americans in power".

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

I actually read some of the document, and that was how it seemed to me.

[billyboy15]

so keep giving them your money.

as the saying goes,”a fool and his money are soon parted”

[Billie Bud]

Last year, our local Salvation Army director on the Facebook page for our Salvation Army has a status for Kamala Harris and congratulating her and celebrating her.

This was the local Salivation Army’s page, not her personal page. We were HUGE donors and asked that she remove it as the Salvation Army page should be free of political posts. She doubled down anyway and was openly hostile. We notified the Salvation Army we were removing support immediately.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

It was not for donors. It was just for Salvation Army members.

"When they came for the Jews I said nothing because I was not a Jew..."

[aquila48]

Is that supposed to make it better??