Despite your histrionics, this study, if anything only proves the need for boosters. BTW, almost all vaccines require boosters and none are 100% effective. There are no ‘proven and effective” therapeutics. And that includes ivermectin and HCQ.
“Why HCQ and Ivermectin were removed from India’s Covid-19 treatment protocol”
“Ivermectin and HCQ were dropped from the clinical guidance after studies found that these drugs have little to no effect on Covid-related mortality or clinical recovery of the patient.”
And this:
“No data available to suggest a link between India’s reduction of COVID-19 cases and the use of ivermectin
the ‘success’ of ivermectin and HCQ is a myth promulgated by quack snake oil salesmen like Americas Front Line Doctors who are making millions off of the naive and gullible.
the ‘success’ of ivermectin and HCQ is a myth promulgated by quack snake oil salesmen like Americas Front Line Doctors who are making millions off of the naive and gullible.
Making millions? LOL. As if Big Pharma isn’t making billions/trillions off the Chicom flu. How many newly minted Big Pharma billionaires are there now?
—> Despite your histrionics, this study, if anything only proves the need for boosters.
VaxxAway! 😂😂😂
“There are no American tanks in Iraq! This is propaganda! We are slaughtering the infidels by the tens of thousands!!”
Despite your attempt to misdirect, the article shows that the shots are not only ineffective after 8 months, but INCREASE the patients’ susceptibility to Covid.
So once you’re in the vax bandwagon, you can never get off.
You are their captive, which is the intent.
“the ‘success’ of ivermectin and HCQ is a myth promulgated by quack snake oil salesmen like Americas Front Line Doctors who are making millions off of the naive and gullible.”
You don’t know if that’s true. There have been many studies by now indicating effectiveness. Favipiravir was approved for use in Japan around 2016 and look who designed it:
“The US Department of Defense developed favipiravir in partnership with MediVector, Inc. as a broad-spectrum antiviral and sponsored it through FDA Phase II and Phase III clinical trials, where it demonstrated safety in humans and efficacy against the influenza virus.[14] Despite demonstrating safety in more than 2,000 patients and showing accelerated clearance of influenza virus by 6 to 14 hours in the unpublished Phase III trials[citation needed], favipiravir remains unapproved in the UK and the USA.”—Wikipedia
The US DOD are idiots, too, for believing in antivirals/anti parasitics? The Japanese are apparently idiots as well for using it to treat Covid. Meanwhile, Merck is pushing their Molnupiravir magic Covid pill. Hmm.
You do know that HCQ and Ivermectin are off patent and are available as low cost generics, right? They and other medications are proven safe and effective in treating Covid.
So you think Fauci, Walensky, the NIH, CDC, FDA have all taken a vow of poverty and have ceased to profit from privately patenting medications developed with taxpayer funds?
Your article link is reminder that Australia, Canada, England, France, Italy and yes, parts of India have corrupt people pushing the plandemic narrative, too.
Excuse me but India and WHO solved the COVID-19 problem in India’s largest state of 230 million people using ivermectin. There are many news stories and professional articles covering the effort and outcome.
https://www.weeklyblitz.net/health/covid-cases-in-indian-uttar-pradesh-drops-by-97-1-percent-because-of-ivermectin-use/
https://newsrescue.com/the-undeniable-ivermectin-miracle-indias-240m-populated-largest-state-uttar-pradesh-horowitz/
https://www.thedesertreview.com/news/national/ivermectin-obliterates-97-percent-of-delhi-cases/article_6a3be6b2-c31f-11eb-836d-2722d2325a08.html
I don’t know about that. These vaccines were advocated to the public with assumptions that are now not in play such as affective ness over time, etc.
For example, when the vaccines were first announced, there was scant discussion on boosters by those within the CDC, FDA, elected officials, etc.
I think it is reasonable to explore why what was initially stated regarding COVID-19 vaccines has sometimes not been what was observed “in the field”. Other countries’ research as published in peer reviewed journals is an important component of that exploration.
Neither of these articles give the raw data or link to the raw data. Be very wary of such articles - they are likely to be just someone’s opinion on some study they may or may not have read. Always read the original study to see if you can agree with their conclusions. And if an article does not give links to studies, then it is prudent to just dismiss that article.
Sorry lodi - I responded to the wrong post! oops
BTW, almost all vaccines require boosters and none are 100% effective.
—
We’re up to 3 and in some cases 4 doses of Covid vaccines in less than a year. Real vaccines that require boosters, like tetanus, are only needed every 10 years.
Fixed it for you.
Which proves the vaxxes DON’T work.
Boosters for legitimate vaccines are not needed every 6 months after already having had two injections.
I have personally witnessed Ivermectin working numerous times and saved lives. Who to believe, some Big Pharma spokesman or my lying eyes.
That India study has you guys really nervous.
“the ‘success’ of ivermectin and HCQ is a myth promulgated by quack snake oil salesmen like Americas Front Line Doctors who are making millions off of the naive and gullible.”
Who’s the QUACK?
Study after study, report after report, testimony after testimony say just the OPPOSITE!
You quote a couple bullshit studies and we are supposed to ignore the vast majority of evidence that they DO work?
Who is paying you to post this propaganda?
That’s pretty funny, chicomboy.
My own wellness MD has treated hundreds of cv19 patients using therapeutics, with zero deaths. AFLN has treated thousands, all with the FLCCC protocol.
We really do need military tribunals in this country...for people like you.
This is the mantra that must be protected at all costs. If it is proven that therapeutics exist which are effective at treating coronavirus then every emergency use authorization for the current forms of “vaccines” become invalid. This puts billions and possibly trillions of dollars earmarked for big pharma in immediate jeopardy.
In this type of environment aspirin would be said to have no therapeutic value against fever and a certain percentage of gullible fools would believe it. There are many therapeutics that are effective in the treatment of Covid. To deny this proves only that one is easily misled.
Despite your histrionics, this study, if anything only proves the need for boosters. BTW, almost all vaccines require boosters and none are 100% effective. There are no ‘proven and effective” therapeutics. And that includes ivermectin and HCQ.
Your post proves only that you did not bother to follow the link to the article that you are supposedly commenting on. Not that this does not happen here frequently, but the example that you provide is particularly blatant. But thank you for providing links not relevant to the discussion and contributing easily disproved meaningless drivel.
In your defense the article that you did not bother to look at somehow misses one of the most important points about the current vaccines. They were “designed” to fight a type of Covid that essentially no longer exists. A brainless pathogen that evolves quickly in response to “leaky” “vaccines” has outwitted so called “experts” who are advising people in positions of authority all around the world.
In my former profession, fires which also have no actual intelligence also outwits firefighters all of the time. This is because like you, a lot of those who believe that they understand the mechanics of the battle actually do not.
Still flogging the product that’s the only one in history whose failures are blamed on those who don’t use it?