deliberately withholding proven and inexpensive therapeutics
No early treatment, no eua of vaccines, no massive Pharma profits.
Clearly, the vaccine is NOT a long term solution for Covid...
And, they know it...
The only technical question remains, are there any long-term health risks to the mRNA vaccine technology inflicted on billions...?
I’ll just drink Koolaid. I think it’s just as effective.
Despite your histrionics, this study, if anything only proves the need for boosters. BTW, almost all vaccines require boosters and none are 100% effective. There are no ‘proven and effective” therapeutics. And that includes ivermectin and HCQ.
“Why HCQ and Ivermectin were removed from India’s Covid-19 treatment protocol”
“Ivermectin and HCQ were dropped from the clinical guidance after studies found that these drugs have little to no effect on Covid-related mortality or clinical recovery of the patient.”
And this:
“No data available to suggest a link between India’s reduction of COVID-19 cases and the use of ivermectin
the ‘success’ of ivermectin and HCQ is a myth promulgated by quack snake oil salesmen like Americas Front Line Doctors who are making millions off of the naive and gullible.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Pfizer
Pfizer said in a statement today that the company is again revising its revenue targets upwards, estimating between $81 and $82 billion in revenue for 2021. Pfizer is now projected to double its 2020 revenue, when the pharma giant brought in $41.9 billion. In 2021, $36 billion will have come from sales of COVID shots that were developed in partnership with BioNTech. With an estimated 30% profit margin, the mRNA shots alone will bring in over $10 billion in profit.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
What brand of shot was evaluated?
Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, AstraZeneca ?
How can you have negative efficacy?!
They test for antibodies - you can’t have a negative number of Covid antibodies.
The so-called vaccines aren’t vaccines at all.
They supposedly trick your body into making bits of the viral outer shell that the immune system then attacks. This works only for a limited time, as the immune system soon recognizes the particles as part of the body and then will ignore them, much like The Borg on Star Trek will ignore individual people........... 😕
Ahh - ok all you fearbros - the “negative efficacy” is a statistical anomaly DIRECTLY caused by the lockdowns.
More people are getting Covid now (when vaccinated) because they’re not isolating.
Gee.....no effectiveness with these hazardous, experimental, yet mandated (for many) shots, at 7 months ping.
Pfizer, Moderna, et al. can make $3.5 trillion taxpayer dollars off of mandatory “free” quarterly booster shots that don’t work.
You might say ‘stick it to the taxpayers’!
So if I read this correctly, after 7 months those people, who get vaccinated, are no better off than the people who never got vaccinated.
And those who did get vaccinated took the risk of something seriously happening to them from the vaccine.
No wonder booster shots are being pushed.
but by nine months later, the efficacy was not just zero, but negative. What ?
catnipman : “ I can't stress enough the importance of this Jo Nova analysis of this Swedish research article published in The Lancet and the implications
with respect to what the National Socialist Democrat Party (NSDP) of fascists are doing to destroy our nation and our people
with mandated poisonous and ineffective medicine, while at the same time deliberately withholding proven and inexpensive therapeutics .. “
The Money Quote:
“Out of this 1.6 million pooled sample, 27,000 people went on to get infected, and most of them were unvaccinated (21,000).
So that’s not surprising, but underlying this data was an extraordinary trend showing efficacy falling month after month.
In the first two to four weeks, the double vaccinated were very well protected.
But by nine months later, the efficacy was not just zero, but negative."
As noted by many FReeper's comments, still unknown is what is the result of these injections, long term, on our immune system and other disease resistance.
There has yet been no long term study on this issue.
In order to find out the long term ramifications might be,
you have to look for it !
AMEN to what you said!
Define “efficacy.” Mitigation of symptoms, or prevention of infection. If the former, how do they know it isn’t because of mutation?
Perhaps the vaccine isn’t effective. But it sure is one hell of an obedience needle.
“ Interpretation: Vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic Covid-19 infection wanes progressively over time across all subgroups, but at different rate according to type of vaccine, and faster for men and older frail individuals. The effectiveness against severe illness seems to remain high through 9 months, although not for men, older frail individuals, and individuals with comorbidities. This strengthens the evidence-based rationale for administration of a third booster dose.” (Emphasis added)
And the group who got vaccinated nine months ago, are obviously not the same sort of people as put it off til September. High risk people were vaccinated earliest and they are the first to reach the “nine months” mark.
The Swedish study is large (to put it mildly) and they even tested a bigger cohort too. By relaxing the matching process they managed to put together a second sort-of-matched cohort of nearly 4 million people. That’s pretty much the whole population of Sweden and it largely confirmed the trends.
In other news, they found that mixing and matching vaccines appear to give a bit better protection than sticking with the same brand.
Nice to read something thoughtful...