FILE PHOTO: A pregnant woman receives a vaccine for the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) at Skippack Pharmacy in Schwenksville, Pennsylvania, U.S., February 11, 2021. REUTERS/Hannah Beier/File Photo Posted on 11/02/2021 1:05:14 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
BREAKING…After re-analyzing a study performed by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) researchers, a peer-reviewed study has called for the “immediate withdrawal of mRNA COVID vaccines for pregnant women, those breastfeeding, those of childbearing age and children after their shocking study reveals stunning results of pregnant mRNA vaccinated women: 92% had a spontaneous miscarriage in the first 13 weeks…while 81.9% of women who received the mRNA COVID vaccine had a spontaneous miscarriage in the first 20 weeks.FILE PHOTO: A pregnant woman receives a vaccine for the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) at Skippack Pharmacy in Schwenksville, Pennsylvania, U.S., February 11, 2021. REUTERS/Hannah Beier/File Photo
The study warns that the conclusions of the Shimabukuro study that support the use of the mRNA vaccine in early pregnancy, which has now been hastily incorporated into many international guidelines for vaccine use, ignores the horrors of thalidomide, a drug commonly taken by pregnant women in the late ’50s and early ’60s to prevent nausea during pregnancy. Thalidomide ended up causing severe birth defects in thousands of children, including scores of children being born without limbs
From the Science, Public Health Policy and the Law report:
The use of mRNA vaccines in pregnancy is now generally considered safe for protection against COVID-19 in countries such as New Zealand, USA, and Australia. However, the influential CDC- sponsored article by Shimabukuro et al. (2021) used to support this idea, on closer inspection, provides little assurance, particularly for those exposed in early pregnancy. The study presents falsely reassuring statistics related to the risk of spontaneous abortion in early pregnancy, since the majority of women in the calculation were exposed to the mRNA product after the outcome period was defined (20 weeks’ gestation).
In this article, we draw attention to these errors and recalculate the risk of this outcome based on the cohort that was exposed to the vaccine before 20 weeks’ gestation. Our re-analysis indicates a cumulative incidence of spontaneous abortion 7 to 8 times higher than the original authors’ results
(p < 0.001) and the typical average for pregnancy loss during this time period. In light of these findings, key policy decisions have been made using unreliable and questionable data. We conclude that the claims made using these data on the safety of exposure of women in early pregnancy to mRNA-based vaccines to prevent COVID-19 are unwarranted and recommend that those policy decisions be revisited.The study indicates that at least 81.9% (≥ 104/127) experienced spontaneous abortion following mRNA exposure before 20 weeks, and 92.3% (96/104) of spontaneous abortions occurred before 13 weeks’ gestation
We question the conclusions of the Shimabukuro et al.[4] study to support the use of the mRNA vaccine in early pregnancy, which has now been hastily incorporated into many international guidelines for vaccine use, including in New Zealand.[1] The assumption that exposure in the third trimester cohort is representative of the effect of exposure throughout pregnancy is questionable and ignores past experience with drugs such as thalidomide.[38] Evidence of safety of the product when used in the first and second trimesters cannot be established until these cohorts have been followed to at least the perinatal period or long-term safety determined for any of the babies born to mothers inoculated during pregnancy. Additionally, the product’s manufacturer, Pfizer, contradicts these assurances, stating: “available data on Comirnaty administered to pregnant women are insufficient to inform vaccine- associated risks in pregnancy”, and “it is not known whether Comirnaty is excreted in human milk” as “data are not available to assess the effects of Comirnaty on the breastfed infant” (page 14).[39]
Yet another example of why Trump needs to get on the right side of this pronto.
🥲🥲
It’s okay. I thought the same thing about Novavax the first time I saw someone use Notavax.
Bookmark
>Then what do you mean by a “Notavax?”
He means that the current covid inoculations are not vaccines in the traditional sense.
For what it is worth, the source of this study, the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge was founded by a pretty loony anti-vaxer (and not just the creepy COVID vax).
It’s on a number of “quack watch” lists despite it’s extremely recent creation.
I’m not smearing it, at all.
Just alerting. Big difference.
There’s been a concerted effort to create agitprop — fake, but believable, stories about how bad the vaccines are — that are then dis-proven with a “Aha! Look at the stupid conspiracies!” by smarmy pharmacy types.
They to this to bury real stories among the muck.
We need to weed out the muck ourselves.
Looking into it more, the IPAK is behind the “aluminum in measles vaccines cause autism” garbage.
Take with a grain of salt.
Or perhaps a whole shaker.
The biggest “Quackwatch” site is run by a real loon (retired psychiatrist). I’d take anything he says with a grain of salt...
http://www.truthwiki.org/stephen-barrett-quackwatch/
Everyone knows Big Pharma's money is behind this insane push, from the Provincial (or whatever they call the equivalent down under) Governor in Australia stepping down over an investigation over $65 million in bribes, to the Canadian pediatrician on the "clots for tots" panel getting $2 million in fees from Pfizer.
And the endless blacklisting and firing of medical personnel, from front-line nurses to top-end doctors at Universities, losing their positions and even their medical licenses for speaking out.
My personal suspicion is GatesOfHell or Sore-Ass Money behind it.
There are also scads of real statistics from NHS in Britain, from Singapore, from Israel, and multiple publications in top peer-review journals which blow away everything the VaxShills are pretending.
But somehow, the pro-jab trolls on FR only concentrate on the worst of the worst, even if they have to fabricate it, just like the “confederate flag patch” at the Youngkin rally last night (brand new patch on a brand-new denim jacket, brand new cowboy hats, right in front of the press box where three different news organizations snapped pictures, but NOBODY managed to get a look at their face or ask any questions).
Or like the Tiki Torch display in front of the Youngkin bus whose members were all Dem functionaries.
p
If the side effects become obvious the the drug companies employees will need to hide. The board of directors will be hunted.
I am curious if it will become a war of the vaccines. Imagine state actors getting in on it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.