Posted on 10/21/2021 12:13:11 PM PDT by Renkluaf
Representative Mike Johnson (R-LA) questioned U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland about his clear conflict of interest today surrounding the Attorney General’s instructions for FBI agents to investigate parents who question school board curriculum. Merrick Garland’s daughter is married to the co-founder of the Critical Race Theory educational material being purchased by the school boards. The exact CRT material being directly challenged by the parents Garland has instructed the FBI to investigate.
In a clear conflict of interest Merrick Garland is using his office to protect the income and investments of his son-in-law’s business. However, when questioned about this conflict today, Merrick Garland says he will refuse to accept any ethical review of his conduct.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
Garland married? I could have sworn he was a poofter.
Dude is butthurt about his SCOTUS diss — one of the things Miotch did well was punch down on Gharlot.
Agree, he's throwing a major Leftist tantrum taking down the enemy at every chance. Yes, I thank Mitch, this guy is a KOOK.
Well who would investigate? DOJ….. LOL. Congress…….LOL. Media…..LOL.
When do the lynchings start?
One of Bidens’ chief psychos.
You know, back in Nixon/W-gate days, remember when the hippies et al regarded John Mitchell, his AG as a psychotic ghoul? I have to confess, this is how I look at Garland and certainly Mayorkis.
>> Merrick Garland says he will refuse to accept any ethical review of his conduct.
And upon sentencing, the criminal refused to accept the terms, and was then immediately released a free man.
What a despicable slime ball.
I am VERY impressed with Representative Mike Johnson (R-LA). He is dogged, unafraid to call out the corrupt AG, very articulate, doesn’t get flustered in the AG’s presence, and is persistent. Well done, Rep. Johnson! Based on this Q&A with Slimeball Garland alone, I hope Johnson goes far.
What makes you think the two are mutually exclusive?
have we taken notice? but of course we have, the attorney doesn’t have a problem answering questions coming from democrat lawmakers, yet it seems that he can’t give a straight answer to most questions coming from republican lawmakers, and pretty much says that he circle back to them at some point.
His lack of respect for the law makes it hard to believe he almost became a Supreme Court judge.
A tyrannical government is not dealt with through the legal system.
Yeah, I recall some old manuscript that began “when in the course of human events....)
I understand that the House voted to hold Bannon in contempt and the decision will be sent over to the DOJ for them to decide whether to prosecute or not.
I also just saw Garland being questioned by Rep. Massie about a screaming man on Jan 6th saying over and over “tomorrow we go into the Capitol.”
Massie asked if the man was an official of the DOJ or FBI and Garland said he could not comment about an investigation.
Well, guess what:
IF DOJ DECIDES TO PROSECUTE BANNON...ALL THAT INFO CONCERNING DOJ OR FBI INSTIGATION OF THE EVENT...WILL COME OUT IN , THE WONDERFUL TOOL...DISCOVERY.
I almost hope they decide to prosecute just to see their reaction when they have to tell the truth.
Fr’kn POS...should be charged for FELONIES!!
Yup
Its not “sic sempter tyrannus” for no reason
Just watched Atlas Shrugged on Netflix. It has never been more reflective of current situation than now. “Who is John Galt?”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.