Vaccine Lobby vs the Unvaccinated: The Global COVID-19 Faultline May Now Be Unbridgeable

Activist Post ^ | JULY 30, 2021 | Dr. Mathew Maavak

[SoConPubbie]

When the global COVID-19 vaccination drive kicked off earlier this year, two distinct faultlines gradually emerged, separating the relatively monolithic pro-vaxxer camp from the more heterogeneous assemblage of fence-sitters, sceptics and outright vaccine refuseniks. The new divide reflected a larger chasm that has prevailed since the watershed event of Sept 11 2001. It was a divide between those who lapped up mainstream narratives and those who instinctively questioned them.

Doubts over the novel coronavirus were sown from the onset by scientific data which appeared sketchy, contradictory and outright dodgy. Big Tech’s digital pogroms against undesirable questions and expert opinions reinforced suspicions further. It was clear that earnest scientific inquiry, which thrives on vigorous debates, will not be tolerated.

This ironically resulted in the “free world” resorting to the likes of TikTok – a Chinese platform once targeted by the Trump administration – to post their opinions and grievances, including a litany of adverse reactions to various vaccines. Despite this, Western elites still have the gall to view themselves as champions of “free speech” even as mass protests against the New Normal roil their cities.

The hypocritical actions of countless leaders, celebrities and “influencers” worldwide who routinely flouted the very lockdowns they had advocated inevitably hardened public scepticism. If there are different sets of norms for the ruling and the ruled, why shouldn’t there be space for divergent opinions over the coronavirus?

The Informed Unvaccinated

A recent MIT study revealed that coronavirus sceptics were generally better-informed and scientifically literate vis-a-vis their vaccinated counterparts. The unvaccinated cohort also appeared more “sophisticated” in the use of “datasets from official sources” as well as “state-of-the-art visualization methods” to interpret the COVID-19 conundrum. The qualitative contrasts between the pro-vaxxer and unvaccinated camps are nicely encapsulated in this video clip.

Mainstream tirades against vaccine holdouts – including profanity-laden epithets such as “morons” and calls to “remove them from society” – further alarmed the unvaccinated. Faced with such gratuitous hostility, vaccine refuseniks can be forgiven for regarding the growing inoculation divide as one between septic tanks and sceptic camps.

One set is fuelled by an intractable Wokist dogma that seeks to undermine every society along its path of contagion. Information is curated by anonymous fact-checkers with little or no domain-level expertise. Obedience is demanded in its totality; otherwise every molehill will be raised to the level of a Mt. Everest through a hyper-trolled hissy fit. Trying to understand the Wokist mindset is like data-mining a bottomless sewer.

Vaccine sceptics, as the author observed, are generally informed by caution, a spirit of inquiry and a prophylactic approach to the pandemic. They have been boosting their immune systems through a variety of means since the outbreak. The author himself spends up to 3 hours a day on jungle treks!

Take Control of Your Family’s Health — Immune System Support Kit (Ad)

Sceptics can also quote an impressive array of experts ranging from mRNA technology pioneer Dr Robert Malone, Harvard epidemiologist Dr. Martin Kulldorff to Nobel Prize-winning virologist Dr. Luc Montagnier as well as expert testimonies before US state and federal authorities. Big Tech and Big Media have not only censored these viewpoints, they may have also played a role in removing cheap, prophylactic drugs like hydroxychloroquine, colchicine and ivermectin from over-the-counter (OTC) pharmacy shelves worldwide. It is considered a heresy to even mention these drugs in the social media. Stricter prescription regimens meant that it was sometimes easier to procure illicit drugs. If one follows the science of statistics, the results are as predictable as they are depressing: Drug overdoses killed 93,000 Americans in 2020, registering a 30% year-on-year increase.

The global medical gulag ushered in by the New Normal inadvertently brought together like-minded individuals across borders, ethnic divides and language barriers, particularly via the exchange of information that were constantly supressed by Big Tech and Big Media. Examples of successful prophylactic treatment regimens (e.g. Armacao dos Buzios in Brazil) were discovered via these interactions.

Arguments of the Unvaccinated

There are many reasons behind rising pushbacks against an aggressive global vaccine lobby.

To begin with, the approval process for new drugs and medical devices in the United States may take 12 and 7 years respectively while vaccine development traditionally involved a long, complex process that may span 10-15 years. Nearly all Covid-19 injections flogged worldwide today are experimental vaccines that were developed in less than a year. Tragic cases like thalidomide babies and the Cutter Incident continue to serve as a cautionary reminder to the unvaccinated. Negative testimonies from families and friends, or from dying patients themselves, are available on TikTok or YouTube alternatives such as BitChute and Brighteon. p>As a result, trust in governments has reached an all-time low. Leaders who parrot the ethos of the New Normal cannot reverse course and face the consequences. By the end of 2020, billionaires made US$3.9 trillion during the pandemic while workers lost US$3.7 trillion. How can politicians justify this silent transfer of wealth? The figures for 2021 are likely going to be much worse. A prolonged medical emergency, backed by repressive state actions, is the only way this ungodly momentum can be maintained.

Distrust towards official COVID-19 statistics was also fuelled by irrefutable counter-trends. Sweden which had never imposed mandatory lockdowns, masking or mass inoculations is faring much better than its vaccine-obsessed counterparts. Schools were kept open and tourists flowed in. Did Sweden just prove the primacy of herd immunity over vaccines?

As of July 29, the cumulative COVID-19 death toll in Sweden stood at a relative low of 14,617. Yet, during the initial outbreak of the pandemic early last year, the global Ministry of Truth was livid at Sweden’s laissez-faire response. The Nordic redoubt was prophesied to become a “catastrophe” and “an example of how not to handle COVID-19.” Swedish experts were carefully cherry-picked by left-wing bastions to be an echo chamber for the New Normal agenda. For a while, it seemed that the only real science coming out of Sweden were the ones vetted by the incomparably erudite Greta Thunberg.

In the United States, a White House plan for door-to-door vaccination appeared hypocritical in light of a stubborn refusal to reveal the number of “breakthrough” COVID-19 cases among its vaccinated staff. Was contact tracing activated to check on people who may have been infected by these individuals?

With such shocking deficits in government transparency, can one blame sceptics for hypothesizing whether it is the vaccines that are actuating the new coronavirus variants? According to a whistleblower who reportedly accessed raw data from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), a mind-blowing 45,000 people have allegedly died from Covid-19 vaccines in the United States. Surely, this figure cannot be true? It is nonetheless a fact that less than 1% of adverse vaccine events are actually reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This leak has sparked a lawsuit led by attorney Thomas Renz against the US federal government. Since a suit has been filed, allegations must be proven in a court of law under the threat of perjury. At the very least, this action may shed some light on how the opaque VAERS functions. If the lawsuit has any merit – which remains doubtful – another charge may be warranted against the grossly misnamed “fact-checking” industry for being complicit in many deaths.

Scapegoating the Unvaccinated

The renewed COVID-19 surge worldwide has necessitated a predictable scapegoat, going by prevalent liberal logic. CNN’s cherry-picked experts are now labelling the unvaccinated as “variant factories” because “the only source of new coronavirus variants is the body of an infected person.” This leap of logic can also be used to hypothesize whether the LGBTQK community may act as “variant factories” for more contagious HIV strains in the future. After all, as the CNN-channelled logic goes: “All it takes is one mutation in one person.” But one can just hear the accusatory shrieks of “intolerance”, “bigotry”, and “hate” when a specious argument is countered by a more politically-sensitive one.

As for “variant factories”, whatever happened to those pangolins or bats that were allegedly the source of the novel coronavirus? Bats can travel up to 800kms and may live for more than 20 years. Bats are also the ultimate “variant factories”. If the zoonotic theory of COVID-19 was correct, bats from southern China should have devastated the northern reaches of neighbouring Southeast Asia last year. However, the worst affected nations in the region are further to the south. Coincidentally, these are the countries that unquestioningly follow WHO recommendations. Calls by former Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak to learn from India’s successful pandemic management have fallen on deaf ears. India had quietly reinstated hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin into the COVID treatment protocol in the face of subtle opposition from its Silicon Valley diaspora.

Scapegoating the unvaccinated as “variant factories” is not only scientifically unproven and ethically deplorable but it criminally likens them to rats carrying a plague. How soon should we wait before the unvaccinated are targeted by mobs inflamed by the “science” of incentivised experts and anonymous fact-checkers? For a historical precedent, think of the centuries-spanning mob lynching of “plague-carrying Jews”?

In an ironic twist, nearly 84% of new COVID cases in Israel are among vaccinated individuals – as US Senator Ron Johnson pointed out in a recent interview. Even if this figure is contestable, how come Sweden does not have a problem with the Delta variant? The efficacy of the Pfizer vaccine in Israel has steadily dropped from a purported 90% to just 39% in a matter of months.

At the end of the day, the vaccine Rubicon has just widened. If current vaccines aren’t working against new variants, why should the unvaccinated jump headlong into the inoculation bandwagon? Coercive vaccination campaigns may have also permanently eroded trust in healthcare systems worldwide.

Dr Mathew Maavak is a regular commentator on risk-related geostrategic issues.

[LSAggie]

Hidden in the fine print....

Thank you, gw..

[mewzilla]

Corona A Primer

Antibody-Dependent Enhancement Risk for SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Developers

“Because if the gun is jumped, and a vaccine is widely distributed that is disease enhancing, that would be worse than actually not doing any vaccination at all.”

[Techster]

From the report, “*No mRNA drug has been approved in this new potential class of medicines, and may never be approved as a result of efforts by others or us. mRNA drug development has substantial clinical development and regulatory risks due to the novel and unprecedented nature of this new class of medicines.”

[grey_whiskers]

Note also that when that was filed in June 2020, Moderna said they were $1.74 billion in debt.

Now look at this:

https://uncoverdc.com/2021/07/10/with-feds-help-moderna-forecasts-record-revenue-of-19-2b/

Nothing like a little unnecessary “Emergency Use Authorization” (> 99% survival rate and most deaths over age 70 with pre-existing conditions; Ivermectin and HCQ/Zinc prevent most hospitalizations) to goose up an experimental drug company’s profits, is there?

[JimRed]

Vaccine lobby = VacciNazis

[logi_cal869]

Wait until 6 months from now, when many of the vaccinated start becoming very ill.

It will take a bit longer, but that's been my position from the outset. I worry for my parents (I believe that my father coerced my mother: He's beholden to msnbc etc.)

[2aProtectsTheRest]

I got Moderna, second shot in February.

[2aProtectsTheRest]

"I'm guessing these examples (explained poorly I'm sure!) are similar to how the mRNA stuff works - it is telling your DNA to create a spiky protein when that is not a normal function of the human body."

No, not at all. First, let's look at the basic structure of a human cell:

So inside the cell, you have the cytoplasm (a sort of gel that allows things to move that need to but otherwise helps hold structures in place), a bunch of organelles including ribosomes, and the cell nucleus. The nucleus is where your DNA is and there's a membrane around it to protect it. The only way in or out is through the nuclear pores.

So all day every day, parts of your DNA are used to create proteins your cell needs to live and do its job. DNA doesn't leave the nucleus, so an enzyme inside the nucleus unwinds part of your DNA and transcribes the needed piece onto messenger RNA which gets constructed in a process called transcription. Once that messenger RNA strand is completed, transport proteins bring it out of the nucleus and into the cytoplasm. One of the organelles in the cytoplasm is something called a ribosome. Its only job is to take messenger RNA and read it to produce whatever amino acid or protein is encoded. So your DNA gets transcribed onto a messenger RNA strand and that mRNA strand is used by ribosomes to create the proteins necessary for life. This happens in every cell in your body all the time.

Now if a virus (like SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19) infects one of your cells, it injects its RNA into the cytoplasm and uses your ribosomes to create complete copies of it. There is no regulation on this; this replication continues until the cell bursts apart with new viruses, each of which can then infect new cells.

With the mRNA vaccines, a strand of mRNA which encodes for one piece of the virus enters some of your body's cells and is read by ribosomes to produce a surface protein from the SARS-CoV-2 virus. That surface protein is just one small part of the virus and can't infect anything or replicate itself, but it's recognized by the immune system as foreign so it triggers a normal immune response. The ribosomes are just doing what they always do: they got some mRNA and they produce the encoded protein. The mRNA itself breaks down rapidly, with a half-life of just a few hours. That means all the mRNA in the vaccine is gone in just a few days. This is in contrast to the self-replicating SARS-CoV-2 virus. It doesn't break down inside the body. It continues infecting cells and replicating until either you are dead or your immune system has destroyed every last virion.

So the important points here are that the mRNA vaccines don't do anything with DNA. Their mRNA has no way into the cell nucleus where the DNA is. If it magically popped in, what happens to mRNA inside the nucleus? Those transport proteins just bring it out through a nuclear pore. And it wouldn't matter anyway because transcription writes DNA to mRNA; not the other way around. mRNA has no way to unwind DNA, no way to make cuts or inserts, and no way to repair DNA. The mRNA just enters the cell cytoplasm and causes some proteins to be created which then train the immune system on how to recognize and destroy the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

I hope this helps your understanding of how this all works.

[tinamina]

What? No vaccines were available a year and half ago.

[2aProtectsTheRest]

Here are a couple videos that can help visualize these processes.

DNA transcription and translation (what your body cells do all the time): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gG7uCskUOrA

mRNA vaccine action: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCk7LyMslxo

Both are very short (under 3 minutes each) and easy to understand. Some people have an easier time with visuals.

[2aProtectsTheRest]

The Phase 1 clinical trials began March 16, 2020. That’s when the first doses were given.

https://about.kaiserpermanente.org/our-story/health-research/news/first-covid-19-vaccine-trial-at-kaiser-permanente-washington

So yes, some people have been vaccinated throughout that whole time. More were vaccinated when the Phase 2 clinical trials began in the spring, and even more last summer. Tens of thousands in the US alone. Over 100,000 participated in the clinical trials between the US and the UK alone.

[frogjerk]

So your immunity runs out at the end of August?

[sarge83]

I used to and still try to respect the choices of those who took the jab, but I have to tell you most them are vicious pricks when it comes to respecting your decision not to take the jab. Self-righteous, condescending and bullying little thugs is the behavior I get back when they find out I am an untouchable, a leper, Juden.

My daughter is starting her last year of college in the nursing program. The hospital where the clinicals are done is demanding all it’s employees get the jab and telling the students you as well will be jabbed. Employees having to submit to the employers economic blackmail and coercion is one thing, but making healthcare decisions for students is something altogether different. Is the hospitals or college going to be responsible for any side effects of these witches brews if something goes wrong?

[2aProtectsTheRest]

There’s no evidence whatsoever to support that. Even if antibody titers were to decrease, the real question is whether Memory B-cell lymphocytes remain to ramp back up that response to an exposure. That’s how antibodies work: your body doesn’t sit there producing antibodies 24/7 to every single pathogen you’ve ever been exposed to. That requires an absolutely massive amount of energy. B-cell lymphocytes produce antibodies for a limited period of time and then 90% die off, leaving 10% dormant as Memory B-cells.

Same for those previously infected as it is for those vaccinated. It’s the same immune response because whether the dendritic cells encounter SARS-CoV-2 S proteins presented due to vaccinated or the dendritic cells encounter SARS-CoV-2 S proteins on the surface of SARS-CoV-2 virions, they’re still just taking those antigens back to the lymph nodes to begin T-cell lymphocyte production.

[frogjerk]

There’s no evidence whatsoever to support that.

So then natural immunity is fine as well as those vaccinated not needing booster shots.

[2aProtectsTheRest]

Yes, I would agree with that.

I would say that a Delta-specific shot would be helpful in reducing the risk of transmission, but anyone who is vaccinated or who has recovered from infection seems to have excellent protection against severe illness and death.

[CarolinaReaganFan]

bookmark