Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supervised Hunt Posed No Risk to Survival of the Wolf
Townhall.com ^ | June 8, 2021 | William D. Balgord

Posted on 06/08/2021 7:07:42 AM PDT by Kaslin

A recent Associated Press story highlights blowback from the recent wolf hunt conducted by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR). A contentious debate ensued when the scheduled hunt was moved up to February from November 2021. A Wisconsin judge broke the logjam ordering the DNR to proceed on schedule with the hunt.

The agency brought the ongoing hunt to a premature halt after two days, when the predicted take of 119 wolves reached 216. Many more wolves were out there than anyone thought beforehand.

AP avoids informing readers why the gray wolf should not have been enabled to reclaim its former range in Wisconsin, lost over the preceding century. The wolf species as a whole was never in danger of extinction. The US Fish and Wildlife Service added the gray wolf to the Endangered Species List under “threatened status” to mollify preservationists. Despite legal challenges, the Department of the Interior delisted the wolf in October 2020.

Historically and today, wolves number in the tens of thousands north of the Canadian border into Alaska. Although the gray wolf had been extirpated from Wisconsin and other Midwest states before the middle of the 20th century, the species persisted out west, in northern Minnesota counties, and in the Michigan UP.

In the 1970s DNR officials, with support from the Fish and Wildlife Service and environmental groups, quietly undertook a study to determine the feasibility of bringing the gray wolf back to northern Wisconsin. After a pack was discovered to have wandered in from neighboring Minnesota, the plan was set in motion. Subsequently, additional breeding pairs were planted at several state locations. Similarly, gray wolves were introduced into Michigan’s Lower Peninsula.

The rollout of the Wolf Restoration Plan met fierce opposition from farm groups, expressing fear of predation and the safety of their families if the wolves made a comeback. The DNR quietly compensates farmers for livestock losses attributed to wolves. Restitution claims climbed steadily from 2017 to 2019.

If, as now appears certain, their growing numbers lead to further encroachment into human proximity, there is a possibility that a wolf may attempt to carry off a small child from a rural homestead. The loss to a grieving family, living within its newly reclaimed range, might be rationalized by the ardent wolf lobby as collateral damage.

The supposition is not so farfetched as first may appear. Several years ago, a pair of coyotes (smaller cousin to the gray wolf) nearly absconded with a toddler in Rye, NY (suburban Westchester County), a few miles north of New York City. A vigilant grandmother saved the tyke at the last second.

Please spare any misplaced sympathies. Our resident wolf population now exceeds 1,000 adults, by a conservative estimate, although the DNR states the adult population fluctuates. The original plan called for an optimum of 350 adult wolves.

Their population continues to expand north and south of the state's midline, demarcated east-west by US Highway 10. Wolf advocates and the DNR initially assured state residents that the packs would respect the invisible boundary. They didn’t. New packs show up in southern counties like Juneau and Adams, well below the “Maginot” demarcation line, in search of venison.

There is an obvious problem. Wolves have not read road maps or the applicable sections of the restoration plan. Accordingly, predation has already reduced deer populations near Camp Douglas, Necedah, and other traditional deer hunting areas in southern Wisconsin, despite earlier agency disclaimers.

As if the wolves weren’t enough, in recent years solitary mountain lions have wandered into the state, spotted visually and by trail camera. One adventuresome male showed up in the Milwaukee suburb of Brookfield and was observed peering into the front window of a home. Go easy, young cat.

Ten years ago the DNR refused to admit that cougars roamed the state. But photographic and other forensic evidence finally convinced the skeptical agency heads what they could no longer deny. A young male had wandered a long way east from his home in the Dakotas before visiting a farm near Elroy, WI. Genetic evidence identified the Black Hills as his “country of origin” and that of several other cats having paid more recent visits to the Badger State.

Concerns mount that if a female cougar shows up here and has a litter of kittens, our DNR will be obligated by federal guidelines to implement regulations to protect them as a resident species, proscribing their killing and designating prime habitat with customary restrictions on land use, cats or no cats being present.

The message is clear. Controlled hunting of North America’s large predators, including the gray wolf, as a primary management tool, favors the interests of both animals and humans. Healthy respect instilled with the sportsman’s rifle, hit or miss, saves lives.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: conservatism; wisconsin; wolf; wolves

1 posted on 06/08/2021 7:07:42 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The wolves will become smarter and harder to shoot next time. They adapt.

I doubt if many residents in the cities care about the lives and incomes of those in the rural areas relative to the “noble” wolves.


2 posted on 06/08/2021 7:17:18 AM PDT by alternatives? (If our borders are not secure, why fund an army?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Wolf advocates and the DNR initially assured state residents that the packs would respect the invisible boundary.”

WTF!!


3 posted on 06/08/2021 7:20:29 AM PDT by billyboy15 (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Wisconsin is very armed. And our hunters are very good. We have too many deer. Our cars and trucks kill far more than our riffles do. But wolves will pick off a child sooner or later. And a mountain lion will pick off a jogger. We already have coyotes living in Chicago and Milwaukee.

But I am not sure we don’t need the wolves and lions. Rabbits and deer are everywhere. Wild life rampant. Culling has to happen. And predators are required. Hawks eagles and owls can’t do it all.


4 posted on 06/08/2021 7:22:16 AM PDT by poinq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny; Ladysmith; Diana in Wisconsin; JLO; sergeantdave; damncat; phantomworker; joesnuffy; ..

Outdoors/Rural/wildlife/hunting/hiking/backpacking/National Parks/animals list please FR mail me to be on or off . And ping me is you see articles of interest.


5 posted on 06/08/2021 7:31:05 AM PDT by SJackson (blow in a dog’s face he gets mad, on a car ride he sticks his head out the window)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; All
A few years ago, I was having a converstation with my cousin, who has cabin on a lovely lake in northern Wisconsin.

She described seen a pair of bobcats in the lights of her car, as she navigated the last mile through the woods on the dirt track to her cabin.

I asked her to describe the "bobcats".

She said, well, kind of a tawny grey, about 20-30 lbs, with a long tail having a black tip.

She accurately described the two "bobcats as a pair of young mountain lions.

6 posted on 06/08/2021 7:48:16 AM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Anyone know how a ‘supervised’ hunt differs?


7 posted on 06/08/2021 8:35:23 AM PDT by sasquatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: poinq
I was born and raised in Wisconsin and go back annually for visits. Went up north last year to visit an old family homestead. The deer population in that area has been heavily culled by wolves, coyotes and bear (God forbid mountain lions take up residence). Cars, trucks and out of season hunting on the Rez are not helping either.
Some people in the area have taken to posting previously open land and fencing off land to keep two and four legged predators out. The fenced in areas seem to provide some security for the deer. At the homestead it is not uncommon to see one or two doe's with fawns living inside the fenced area around an old orchard. It is only a couple of acres that include the old house and barn. One family member went out and repaired the fence line when he started seeing the deer inside the orchard. Although wolves have been seen, they seem to stay out of the fenced off areas and the bear have yet to break down the fences. The deer leave before the fall. But return on and off, I am guessing when they are being pushed by predators. My family have always been avid hunters now they seem to be going the extra mile to protect dwindling herds. Where I live now Red Wolves are protected, coyotes are shot on sight and bear populations are heavily managed by the State. In fairness when everything is equal, the predators cull the sick and weak deer from herds, leaving the strongest and smartest to survive. Unfortunately, when you add people and development into the equation, everything is no longer equal.
8 posted on 06/08/2021 8:42:08 AM PDT by OldGoatCPO (No Caitiff Choir of Angels will sing for )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: poinq

There are approximately 30 some thousand car deer accidents in Wis.

Wis. Hunters kill hundreds of thousands of deer each year.

The two are no even close.


9 posted on 06/09/2021 2:44:01 AM PDT by riverrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OldGoatCPO

Predator’s do each the old and sick but they also each any healthy animal they can catch.

The they only eat the old and sick is another myth.

Promoted by the anti’s and poor science.

I live in prime Wis. wolf country a normally see 6 to a dozen wolves a year.

I have seen more wolves the coyotes in some years


10 posted on 06/09/2021 2:49:59 AM PDT by riverrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OldGoatCPO

Don’t worry there is a huge number of deer in our state. Wisconsin has tons of deer in every county even Milwaukee city limits. There is no shortage of deer. A simple ten minute drive down 43 or 90 you will see deer either grazing in a farm or dead on the side of the road. I see them in my back yard. When I was young you could only hunt one buck. Now you can take does and fawns as well. If your county does not have deer, hunt in the county next door. And now, when the hunting is over, they send in DNR people to cull the herd further.

They also have seasons for bear, turkey and elk. Never seen an elk here, turkey is everywhere. So they will ad Crane hunting season for the bad shots.


11 posted on 06/09/2021 9:21:00 AM PDT by poinq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: riverrunner

Its rare for me to drive anywhere without seeing at least one dead deer on the road side. I have never hit a deer. But deer have hit me. Literally, head butting the side of my car. Hard to imagine that anyone knows how many deer are hit by cars in Wisconsin. Especially since everyone in Wisconsin drinks and drives. They would never report hitting a deer.


12 posted on 06/09/2021 9:26:58 AM PDT by poinq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: poinq

340,000 deer harvested in Wisconsin last year....you sure about that traffic kill count?

For car kills to just match that means one in 11 Wisconsin driving age citizens hit and killed a deer

I looked it up

One in seventy seven

Still quite high.....a top ten state for such occurrence


13 posted on 06/09/2021 9:32:39 AM PDT by wardaddy (Feel my warmth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: poinq
From what I am being told it is county by county. I spoke to a DNR employee last year in Ashland who said deer are being pushed South because of the predator population in the North. He said it is causing problems in the more heavily populated southern part of the State. This was before the wolf cull. He made an off the cuff comment about insurance companies pushing the State to do something.
14 posted on 06/09/2021 9:37:28 AM PDT by OldGoatCPO (No Caitiff Choir of Angels will sing for )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: riverrunner
Wolves and Bears are apex predator. Coyotes are more opportunistic predators. A wolf pack can easily bring down a healthy deer. Predators do take out the sick, weak or underdeveloped deer which should theoretically weed out the gene pool leaving more robust animals. That does not mean predators only hunt weak or sick deer. You are correct that is a animal rights myth.

Where I live we hunt from Oct-Jan, we can take six deer per year, but only three does or spikes under 1 in. We have hunters who fill quotes in a week and we still have dead deer littering the roads in October and November. We see lots of coyotes, very few wolves and at least one bear during the season. Generally, one week before bear season and sitting on a corn pile. Can't shoot them on a bait pile since it is illegal to bait bears. With mild winters and only hunters as apex predators our deer population has risen rapidly.

15 posted on 06/09/2021 10:06:03 AM PDT by OldGoatCPO (No Caitiff Choir of Angels will sing for )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson