Posted on 05/29/2021 10:27:41 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
A bombshell new study claims to have proof that Chinese scientists created COVID-19 in a lab and then tried to reverse-engineer versions of the virus to make it look like it evolved naturally from bats.
British Professor Angus Dalgleish and Norwegian scientist Dr. Birger Sørensen wrote they’ve had primary evidence “of retro-engineering in China” since last year, but were ignored by academics and major medical journals, The Daily Mail reported Saturday, citing the soon-to-be-published study.
The study concludes: “the likelihood of it being the result of natural processes is very small.” The virus is still killing 12,000 people a day around the world.
Dalgleish is a London oncology professor known for breakthrough work on a vaccine for HIV. Sørensen is a virologist and chair of the pharmaceutical company Immunor, which developed a coronavirus vaccine candidate called Biovacc-19. Dalgleish also has a financial stake in that company.
It was during their COVID-19 vaccine research that the pair came across “unique fingerprints” indicating the virus didn’t come from nature, they said. The telltale clue: a rare finding in the COVID-carrying virus of a row of four amino acids, which give off a positive charge and bond to negative human cells.
“The laws of physics mean that you cannot have four positively charged amino acids in a row,” Dalgleish told the Daily Mail. “The only way you can get this is if you artificially manufacture it.”
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
This has been known for at least a year. But you know..it was a Trump conspiracy.
Epoch Times had a very good report on that thing since they claim to have people on the inside of the cesspool of a country.
But the Epoch Times..you know, they are nefarious because of their base...Fulon Gong or whatever its called.
Why did the medical journals ignore this last year ? Because they have every bit a political agenda as the mainstream media and last year’s agenda was not to do anything that would help Trump.
Bfl
“Explosive” has become an overused and meaningless word.
The New England Journal of Medicine to name one.
RE: “Explosive” has become an overused and meaningless word.
Would it be OK to replace the word with “Bombshell” instead? LOL!
Right up there with “Bombshell”
PING
Clever people, these Chinese, or at the very least subtly devious, and maybe mischievous.
“Gain-of-function” apparently has quite a number of side applications. Not only to make it highly contagious, but to disguise the true course of the manipulation in artificially mutating the virus particles.
Turns out, though, that the “deadly” portion of the designer genes implanted in the virus particles was only of any effectiveness upon certain people, and only if a certain course of the disease proceeded. Most people shook off the infection with only a few lingering aftereffects, that affected a particularly vulnerable demographic. As a means of decimating the population, it was a major bust.
Epoch Times is outstanding, especially its daily internet articles. Mostly intelligent comments as well.
Ya’ll need to get with the program, it’s BOMBSHELL, not Bombshell. Case matters.
“As a means of decimating the population, it was a major bust.”
That is no problem. They’ll just keep on working on it till they perfect it.
But as a means of creating utter panic it was a huge success.
They suckered Trump and got him backed into a corner.
Then it was release on purpose. We probably will never have the evidence to prove that. But this virus sure helped the bad guys get everything they wanted.
I still think it was accidental release from Wuhan, and then they intentionally infected other countries when they new they couldn’t control it. Kind of like the part in The Stand when we sent Capt Tripp’s virus to other countries. I also believe they killed off millions of their own (73 million fewer cell subscribers in China?) - crematorium’s running 24x7 for months!
What’s up with those idiots - so-called journalists (in this case, somebody named Eileen) - expressing their moronic opinions (”bombshell” or not) on the study that yet-to-be-published? I have no doubts in the human-made origin of the Covid virus, but statements like “..The laws of physics mean that you cannot have four positively charged amino acids in a row” are total garbage. Why physics, and not chemistry, biology, etc.? Also, if this amino acid sequence (four negatively charged units) was found in the actual viral genome, than, apparently, laws of physic are wrong. Are they (Daily Mail and others) trying to discredit “bombshell” study even before it is published/
Tantalizing, but all news is suspect these days, including the news I’d like to agree with.
News is dead, meaningless.
mark
Agreed. It’s gobbledygook.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.