This sure makes the Maricopa County, AZ Board of Elections look guilty doesn’t it?
this is just another obvious tampering found along the way and as far as I can tell, no one is ever held accountable.
find out who deleted the file, and arrest them. Without action, the other side just keeps doing what they do withour fear of consequences.
Those in Maricopa County who intentionally destroyed evidence that was subpoenaed also need to go to jail.
At first sight of the enemy, recuse yourself and write strongly worded letters...
Arizona is but the first domino to fall then the other states will follow. All the crimes are being revealed. It will soon be fully seen that the thief in chief did not win and the actual President be seated.
But wait, Liz Cheney claims the election was on the up and up.
I guess state laws on retaining vote records do not apply to Democrats.
This kind of disregard of the laws will continue until people are arrested and convicted.
Counting, recounting, double recounting AFTER every election will not fix this.
Prison is the cure.
The County claims it has does not have the administrative passwords. So who had access and the ability to delete the files that are “missing”? It can’t be very many people. Charge them all, and jail them pending trial until one rats out the others, and maybe even discloses who has copies.
Start sending people to prison, this will stop.
Didn’t Arizona own the election database?
How is this not theft of state property?
Spoliation of evidence refers to the negligent, intentional, or reckless, hiding, withholding, altering, fabricating, or destroying any evidence that is relevant to the lawsuit.
The adverse inference rule
One important concept for plaintiffs in a lawsuit when spoliation has been proven is that application of the adverse inference rule. This rule says that, if the plaintiff was attempting to present evidence on a legal issue or fact that is essential to their case, but is unable to do so because a piece of evidence has been destroyed by the defendant, then the jury is allowed to infer that the destroyed evidence would have been adverse to the defendant. The jury can then accept the plaintiff’s reasonable interpretation of what the destroyed evidence would have shown.
BKMARK
“Please advise why these folders were deleted....”
Give me a break. Do you really have to ask that question.
The legal term for this is called spoliation, and should be an automatic win for Trump.
Spoliation means that in a court of law if one person deletes evidence it can be assumed that it contained information detrimental to their side.
Shocked. SHOCKED, I tell you.
Actually, I would be shocked if the hadn't tried to pull something like this.
WHAT this means is that we got caught with our pants down cheating, and this is what you do when you cheat and get caught, you delete the evidence that will put your sorry @$$ in the Maricopa County Jail!!! I bet they hate it that Sheriff Joe retired now.
Time to send some Democrats to jail for an extended period of time either for crimes, contempt of court or both.
I would like to see a judge sentence some of the election board folks to jail until they turn over the password. If they can’t turn it over, then keep them in jail until they can state who has the password and then let them out only if that person gives the password.
As to destroying public records there are laws and fines that can be imposed for the destruction of public property. Information is property.
Holy Moly does it ever! Wow!
Obstruction of justice...at the *very* least. The Harris/Biden Department of Just Us will be all over this!