Posted on 04/03/2021 3:32:29 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
We have all been listening to Mike Lindell for the past few months about how he had irrefutable evidence of election fraud. Another BOOM is what I figured. We are all getting pretty tired of the hype. I wasn't going to bother watching it but my wife did and then we watched it together.
Maybe there is nothing we can do about it, maybe there is, but the fact is that he really does have irrefutable evidence of the election fraud. That's why not even George Soros' factcheck.org will touch it. They "debunked" the first one, but they are hoping that people who check don't realize that Mike has a second video.
Not many people have the time to watch an hour long video, so that will limit the audience.
That's why I am going to outline the most imporant parts so you can get the bullet points in a couple of minutes.
This is the real thing. The election was stolen, and it was stolen online in real time and if we don't do something about it our country is lost.
Dr. Douglas Frank holds a Ph.D in Surface Analytical Chemistry with over sixty scientific publications including a cover page article in Science magazine in 1990 and was on the cover of the Naturwissenschaften, in Europe.
He determined that 2010 US Census data was used to inject phantom voters into the 2020 election rolls. He proved it by going house-to-house to 1600 houses to audit 2020 voters and determined that 32% of the "voters" did not live at that address. THIS WAS NATIONWIDE, IN ALL 50 STATES.
Mike Lindell TV Releases Irrefutable Election Theft Proof on New Television Special That Features World Renowned Physicist
https://lindelltv.com/mike-lindell-tv-releases-irrefutable-election-theft-proof/
Every precinct/county in the country has a voter registration database.
In most states you can download the voter registration database for free but some states charge hefty fees.
The voter registration database shows all registered voters and their voting histories.
There were lots of (too many) voters who only voted once, in November 2020.
Hired people to go house-to-house to 1600 houses to audit 2020 voters and determined that 32% of the "voters" were "phantom" and did not live at that address.
Votes can be manufactured by having a computer algorithm that votes for registered voters who never show up to vote.
The only way to know for sure if a "voter" actually voted is to ask them.
The night of the election (and for several days before and after), White Hats were monitoring computer intrusions into the voting machine network and collecting times and MAC/IP addresses of the intruders.
You can graph the number of registered voters by age from the voter registration database.
The numbers of people who voted in each age bracket should always be substantially less (~80%) than the number of registered voters in that bracket.
Small discrepancies are disregarded by "experts"
90% or more is highly suspect.
Hamiltion County, Ohio had 95% of the population registered to vote with some ages having more voters than residents of that age.
The percent of votes cast (red curve) for each age group were exactly the same, mirroring the registered voter curve. This is almost impossible in even one county, but it happened in all 88 counties in Ohio, which could only be accomplished through a computer algorithm.
The same key was used for all 88 Ohio counties. The key is the algorithm that turns registrations into "voters." What this means is the same percentage of each age group voted in every county in Ohio.
This is the key that converted registrations to ballots in every county in Ohio. Dr. Frank took the average of fourteen Ohio counties to create the key that worked for all 88 Ohio counties. The curve is a 6th order polynomial, which makes it much easier to construct the key because only 6 numbers are required instead of 82 numbers for age 18 through 100. Along with the turnout number the algorithm can predict every county in Ohio. This allows the intruders to set up the alogorithm ahead of time.
The Stark County, Ohio voter curve shows two sharp shoulders at approximately 75 and 80 years of age. All 88 counties show this same pattern of 75 and 80 year old voters. This pattern holds up not only in Ohio, but in EVERY STATE tested so far. The gray curve is the predicted voter results from the algorithm, the red curve is the actual voter results. The correlation coefficient between the two is 1.0000, meaning it is a perfect fit.
This could only be accomplished with constant interaction between the voting machines and a supercomputer somewhere on the Internet. When Dr. Frank saw Mike Lindell's first video all the pieces fell together. Mike's group has all the evidence on the computers that were doing this, they just didn't know what those computers were doing. Dr. Frank's discovery fills in what they were doing.
The two-shoulder pattern in voting for 75 and 80 year olds shows up in Pennsylvania District O4 voting records.
The 2010 US Census data for Pennsylvania District 04 has those same two shoulders.
Q: What are the odds?
A: Zero.
2010 Population was used by the algorithm to determine phantom registrations
Graph: Registered Voters vs Population.
Bloomfield County Colorado; registrations greater than population because population decreased since 2010. More people voted than even lived there.
More people registered in 20 Colorado counties than live there because they used the 2010 US census in the algorithm and population decreased in those 20 counties.
Jackson County, Colorado; more phantom voters than live there because population decreased since 2010.
Knocked on doors and determined that 32% of voters did not live there.
Anybody can get their county's voter registration database and conduct their own audit of people who only voted in the 2020 Presidential election.
THIS IS THE BIGGEST CRIME IN HISTORY. WE MUST GET RID OF THE COMPUTERIZED VOTING MACHINES.
Fair point. I think showing photo ID to prove you are alive should suffice.
It’s not a requirement to vote, just sufficient to get you out of that 72 hr psych hold...
**Waiting for what? All the numbers in post 123 are reasonable**
Waiting for Rightwing Conspiratr1 to reply to the numbers.
Plus, you have some situations (they show lists) where there are well over 100% voter registrations than people who live in the precinct. Some as high as 150%. In other words, the registration data is very old, the census data old, and the agorithms pre-written which caused problems because they couldn't very easily insert fake votes beyond a certain threshold (even though in some demographics, there ARE more votes cast than registered voters).
And just to be clear, I am not particularly a Lindell fan and we own no mypillow products. His videos are too long, I didn't even watch the first 3 hour video. This video is a follow-up using different arguments, it is "only" 55 minutes long and Lindell spends a lot of time talking over it. So I skipped through to listen to the professor. If you have 20-30 minutes play the video, skip over most of Lindell talking for the first 5 minutes, listen to the next 10-15 minutes and then fast forward to places where they point and get animated and listen to those sections.
I don't have any particular knowledge how the machines work. There were all kinds of talk about the data being sent to Germany to be tabulated etc but I have no idea if the machines are connected via network. Makes more sense to me if the machines were just programmed via USB drive to use an algorithm+historic voter data+registration data and insert X votes to fit in the gaps it expected. As another poster said they really only needed to flip a few key counties in a few key states... but if voter turnout ended up being much higher than expected they would have to stop the count and figure out a way to make the cheating look better, and if Trump was way ahead they would have to figure out exactly where and which age groups they can add even more votes.
But in the end I suppose one motivation for all this is that it gives Lindell and others who are being sued a plausible legal defense. These data need to be explained. Maybe there is a good explanation but their existence gives plausibility to the comments they made for which they are accused of slander. These data say "there is reason to be suspicious of the machines". It either gives them a defense, or it forces the plaintiffs into providing more detailed discovery to explain the data away which I would wager they would not want to do.
You didn’t include how many of the ballots were from phantom voters.
In the future, there might be classes for retarded people to eliminate their retardation.
I’ll let both of you know.
They weren’t subtracted and made to disappear. Votes were switched from
Trump to Biden.
Do you know what fractional voting is?
Do you know that the Dominion manual states the system is made to alter the vote totals?
I don’t think you understand. That’s okay. You do your thing.
*
What he is claiming is that the bumps and wiggles in the voting curve, that match the bumps and wiggles in the registration curve is proof that votes were inserted. That's it.
Moreover, if you are using 2010 census data for people aged 60-70, those people are now age 70-80. It stands to reason they would passed on, downsized their homes, moved to better weather states etc. So that "2010 census data" is the "key" that informs the algorithm where they can reasonably insert ballots on behalf of people who don't generally vote BUT it is based on decade old data and possibly even older registration data (most states never scrub their voter rolls)
All 100% irrelevant. Doesn't matter what they think about people moving out or deceased or just not voting but still on the voter rolls. The only thing that matters is what is the evidence that they added votes to the actual voters via algorithm. And for that, their "proof" is the claim that the wiggles should not match. The claim is that it is "impossible" even in one county never mind many counties.
That equates to a claim that the percentage of registered voters who actually vote is discontinuous. IOW 90% of 70 year olds vote, then it is "impossible" for 90% of 71 or 69 year olds to actually vote. And that if it is shown (as they show) that exactly 90% of 69, 70, and 71 registered year olds voted, then those equal percentages were created by the application of an algorithm programmed to produce the even 90% across the board.
The numbers from across the country (and fundamentals of statistics) points in the other direction: the larger the sample size the more likely it is that the percentage of actual voters will be constant across adjacent ages (but rise from a lower percentage in younger to a flat higher percenrtage in older ages).
Makes more sense to me if the machines were just programmed via USB drive to use an algorithm+historic voter data+registration data and insert X votes to fit in the gaps it expected.
Vote flipping algorithms of any sort, preprogrammed or dynamic, would make sense if there were evidence for it. That evidence would be this: count the ballots and compare to the machine results. Did they do that? Not sure elsewhere but in Georgia they did it. In some counties they found more Biden votes that weren't counted the first time. In some counties fewer. In some counties more Trump votes were found and in some counties fewer Trump votes. In short, no pattern of machines flipping votes to or from.
If you subtract the votes that didn't get counted the first time around (e.g the misplaced memory stick votes), then there were a few votes added by the machines that didn't show up in the hand count. But only hundreds and they didn't favor either candidate. There is simply no evidence that machines added votes in Georgia other than randomly and very small amounts (0.02% or less). Equates to hundreds (out of 5 million) ballots fed through twice. Or nefariously added by the algorithm. I'll go with fed twice.
I will. My thing is to call out people who promote conspiracies by presenting "mathemetical" evidence from yourube (and their useful idiot sidekicks). I'll keep checking in from time to time.
Yes. My thing is to help educate helpless people who want to just whine, cry and wave their hands in the air because they have no capacity to understand anything.
I'll look forward to that. But I do sincerely appreciate the text up in the thread. There's nothing more useless than a loooong video by unfocused academic being interviewed by a man who knows absoliutely nothing. On the other hand your text gave me something I could actually dissect.
Uhhhhhm.
Gee This is hard.
Nov 3. 1100 pm. Trumps up BIG. WE GO TO BED
NOV 4-10. They
Board up windows
Kick out republicans
Count count count
Then. Magic !!! They WIN !
Uhmmmmm. If you’re a MORON. Biden got 80 million. And won
If you’re NOT A MORON. www.hereistheevidence.com
Or. Www.kraken-Powell.com
Or. The Donald
Or. The great awakening
Or Q.
Proof. For all to see. Is imminent. Courts be DAMNED !!!!
It would be great if someone could determine if there has been consistent correlation between the use of computerized voting and the bluing of a state.
In Nevada, we were always a right of center state and we used paper ballots with the little punch pins to vote.
Since the use of computers for voting began, the state has become more and more blue.
It has been assumed that that change has been the result of people from other west coast state moving here.
Now, I can’t help but wonder.
Also, the use of mail in only balloting like Washington and Oregon. Is there a similar expansion of democrat wins that mirrors the expanded use of mail in balloting?
I think this cheating has been going on for a long time.
A little bit more than that. He figured out that there is a tight correlation between a number of expected votes and the number of actual votes, and that correlates tightly to registration. And he calculated it to be something in the range of 78%. And that correlates to registration curve across all age groups.
And if you run that 78% number it correlates in each of the counties shown. That is what the R=1.000 means. R=1.000 means it correlates perfectly. Which can happen once. Maybe twice. But in every county? Very tightly correlated (sometimes R=0.998 or thereabouts), but it's too close to be real votes in all cases. If you look at the charts posted in the OP you can see the R number on each slide, and you can see the light blue line (expected votes based on 78% of registration) basically overlaps with the red line (actual votes) perfectly. It just can't be random fluke that you can apply the same % across many counties and states and age groups and have such tight correlation of expected votes with real votes to the registration number. There would have to be some deviations if it were random.
Now maybe there was ballot stuffing designed to meet that correlation. Or maybe there was an algorithm, or some combination of the two. Or maybe he is FOS or has bad data or didn't do the math correctly.
Or how about,
Most of 2020,
Trump storms the country with multiple rallies, cheering throngs of thousands greet him wherever he goes.
Biden occasionally makes an appearance in front of some cars that honk, assaults people who ask him questions, won’t take his stupid mask off, calls his hecklers “chumps for Trump”.
November 3, 11 PM through November 4-10, all the aforementioned evidence of fraud you mention.
Trump gets 74 million votes that we know of.
Biden pulls 80 million votes out of his a@@! How’d those get up there! Prunes really work!
Media shouts down anyone who disbelieves the “miracle”. Just as objections to final tally in Arizona are being heard on January 6, “rioters” show up to disrupt serious consideration. Trump is blamed. Brooklyn Bridge is sold!
And the two biggest counties in Pennsylvania (Philadelphia and Allegheny) don’t even use Dominion machines. Oh yeah, I forgot to mention that Trump actually increased his vote share in Philadelphia too.
_____________________________________________________________
It’s pretty obvious what happened IMHO. Too many white idiots voted for Biden in the suburbs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.