Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How a Chinese missile turned US military strategy on its head
https://www.businessinsider.com ^ | Mar 24, 2021, 10:11 AM | Alex Hollings , Sandboxx News

Posted on 03/25/2021 11:32:50 AM PDT by RomanSoldier19

The US military is shifting its focus from asymmetric wars in the Middle East to near-peer rivals.

Those rivals, namely Russia and China, have had two decades to see how the US fights and find ways to counter its strengths.

After nearly two decades of counter-terror operations around the world, the United States military has recently begun shifting its focus away from this form of asymmetric warfare and back toward the potential for near-peer conflicts with nations like China or Russia.

Despite maintaining the most powerful military apparatus on the globe, this pivot won't be without its challenges. Over the past 19 years, the United States military has funneled the majority of its funding into combat operations and new technologies that support the counter-terrorism endeavor.

During this time, national opponents like China have had ample opportunity to observe the way America's military operates, and find cost-effective methods of countering the US's most significant strengths.

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ccp; russia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 03/25/2021 11:32:50 AM PDT by RomanSoldier19
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

Oh no, think of the profits from a new slew of military contractors!


2 posted on 03/25/2021 11:36:55 AM PDT by Bayard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

was this NOT the technologies privately SOLD to China
by the CLINTONS in the ‘90s including every pending
US patent application?

nothing to see here. just like the caged children
on the EVERGREEN ships.
just like the Davy Crockett transfer
prior to the CLINTON BenGhazi Atrocity.
nothing to see here.
now go away. [just like the DO”J” has done for DECADES.]


3 posted on 03/25/2021 11:39:18 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Tuitio Fidei et Obsequium Pauperum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19
Thanks for posting this great article.

It points out the stupidity of distracing ourselves in the war on terror. Not only did we expend resource on the wrong things, but worse, we created a class of entitled swamp rats who are raking off money to maintain the ability to support low intensity conflict in empty desserts, making it difficult to say, ok, we got it wrong. Let's fix our problem. To fix the problem you need a Tsar Bomba to take on the greater DC swamp so you can even start doing the right things.

4 posted on 03/25/2021 11:44:16 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bayard

As I just posted, fixing this requires spilling the rice out of the rice bowels of hoard of military contractors who have no ability to do anything high tech. Want to house 5000 civilian support personnel in some 3rd world SH, they are your guys. Want a new hypersonic laser guided rocket - they cannot even spell the words.


5 posted on 03/25/2021 11:46:21 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19
Unrestricted Warfare: China's Master Plan to Destroy America

This is the title on Amazon and it's $6.99 for the Kindle ebook. But, just for you, because you are my FRiend, it's available at the OODA site for a special price of FREE download!

6 posted on 03/25/2021 11:51:23 AM PDT by Perseverando (Antifa, BLM, RINO's, Islamonazis, Statists, Communists, DemoKKKrats: It's a Godlessness disorder!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

I still can’t believe we scrapped the F22 Raptor for MRAPs. I’ll never get over that. There had to be another way.


7 posted on 03/25/2021 11:51:41 AM PDT by RC one (When a bunch of commies start telling you that you don't need an AR15, you really need an AR15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

Really need to get the SAM-6 1b fielded and tested and IMPROVED...Also need mobile batteries of these all over the South Pacific. The first places struck will be Guam and Australia. With having a limited range, they are really only defensive for a limited area. A broad range/theater wide AMD system needs and alternate communications system needs to be developed freaking PRONTO!


8 posted on 03/25/2021 11:54:16 AM PDT by fuente (Liberty resides in three boxes: the ballot box, the jury box and the cartridge box--Fredrick Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
was this NOT the technologies privately SOLD to China by the CLINTONS in the ‘90s including every pending US patent application?

Yes, but not just the Clintons, the DNC was fully involved as well.

9 posted on 03/25/2021 11:55:09 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (Celebrate Decivilization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

We our financing our own destruction.
The Chinese missile is just one more of their tools to do it.

We should not be buying ANYThING Chinese.

There are a lot of things we should and should not be doing but, our country is just blindly walking to our own destruction.


10 posted on 03/25/2021 12:01:10 PM PDT by right way right (May we remain sober over mere men, for God really is our only true hope. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one

The MRAPS are utilized domestically whereas the F22 Raptors are off shore weapons.


11 posted on 03/25/2021 12:04:57 PM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

Can’t remember where I read it but the AF is testing a Rocket capable of mach 20.


12 posted on 03/25/2021 12:34:04 PM PDT by Rappini (Compromise has its place. It's called second.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
I guess they are now. I remember Gates telling us that "we need MRAPS, we don't F22s". I think what it really was was that our customers wanted to buy F22s and we only wanted to sell the F35. We didn't want the F22 technology and capabilities getting out of our control. So we got rid of the program and got our MRAPs which, IIRC, ended up getting stolen by insurgents. Now they get used by US police to confiscate American's firearms. Oh wait, that comes later. Shame we don't have the F22 program anymore though. IMO.
13 posted on 03/25/2021 12:41:19 PM PDT by RC one (When a bunch of commies start telling you that you don't need an AR15, you really need an AR15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: right way right

14 posted on 03/25/2021 12:46:10 PM PDT by RomanSoldier19 (Game over, man! Game over! ; : rem ad triarios redisse is)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19
According to info that is available online, analysts who've looked at Chinese military doctrine (have no idea why that would be available to them) focuses up front on crippling our infrastructure. Jamming all our comms, massive cyber attacks to wipe out our command and control, stuff like that. THEN they come in with their inferior weapons (maybe some superior ones, I don't know), when we are confused, blind, and scattered into isolated pockets and our plans are shot to hell.

I have no idea if this is really their plan but it makes sense to me if you are going to war with someone with a much larger military but you have the advantage of being sneaky, devious, and amoral.

15 posted on 03/25/2021 1:03:15 PM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bayard

“The US military is shifting its focus from asymmetric wars in the Middle East to near-peer rivals”

It was a stupid shift in the first place.


16 posted on 03/25/2021 1:17:51 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

Simple solution: We all need to learn Chinese. /s


17 posted on 03/25/2021 1:18:30 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cranked

Just like Spanish was useful for those commanding a crew of braceros...understanding Mandarin will be good for those taking orders.


18 posted on 03/25/2021 1:23:03 PM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

Defeat the Chinese the same way we defeated the Japanese, destroy their merchant shipping.

Sink 50 merchant ships and no more will even attempt to sail to Chinese ports. And, that is the end of the Chinese Economy and the CCP.


19 posted on 03/25/2021 1:29:29 PM PDT by MattMusson (Sometimes the wind blows too much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

Post 15 is good on CCP military doctrine. The Chinese will attack our overseas bases and our homeland with hacking and electronic attacks that don’t cause widespread physical damage but mess up our command & control, plus mess up our infrastructure.

In our US, the civilians are like panicked babies when their lights, cell phones and twitter/facebook accounts go down. When the supermarkets and transportation is messed up, everyone will panic. The federal and state governments will be so busy hand holding, these won’t be able to respond to the Chinese attack. Peace, not war will be our reason to surrender to the Chinese.


20 posted on 03/25/2021 2:19:03 PM PDT by RicocheT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson