Data Expert Claims His Team Has Identified Enough Fraudulent Ballots in Georgia, Arizona and Wisconsin to Overthrow the Election

GATEWAY PUNDIT ^ | 2/2/2021 | Joe Hoft

[bitt]

Matt Braynard was on with Steve Bannon and the War Room crew today and he discussed the 2020 election results that he and his team uncovered after the election. Matt Braynard from the data integrity project has identified a number of fraudulent votes included in the 2020 election which when addressed he claims would overturn the results of the election in three states (Georgia, Arizona and Wisconsin) and be enough to overturn the 2020 election.

Braynard and his team have been going at this since the election and they have uncovered thousands of invalid ballots included in this election:

Tonight on the War Room Braynard reported that:

Among these three states, the number of illegal ballots surpassed the margin of victory. Georgia, Wisconsin and Arizona – without those three Joe Biden isn’t President. See Braynard starting at the 43:45 minute mark:

video

[gathersnomoss]

Groundhog Day.
Tell Lucy to take her ball home.

[lepton]

Nothing will come of it because no one wants to do anything that will upset the status quo.

---

It was astonishing to hear some of the courts, including at least one state supreme court flatly state exactly that. I mean we expected they felt that way, but I didn’t expect for them to say so in their ruling.

[Faith]

The Lord appears to have been on a bit of break lately

Not so. The Word says He never slumbers nor sleeps.

[Eagles6]

Yes, i'm aware of Mr Navarro's work and all of the others.

I should have been more specific.

A 60-90 min., professionally done video production, presenting all of the evidence in one place.

Easily understandable.

Easily shareable.

Make it go viral. Big tech, the msm and the left will be unable to suppress it.

Hell, put some hot babes, explosions, gun fights and car chases in it to hold the viewers' attention.

[BroJoeK]

"”Irregularities” aren’t necessarily fraud and he presents zero evidence that the weaselly worded “potentially illegal ballots” even favored Biden, let alone would have changed the outcome."

So, what, you're saying there was no fraud and no "potentially illegal ballots"?
And you know this because of... how?

[BroJoeK]

"We are still only looking at the tip of the voter fraud iceberg."

I suspect right there is the bottom line.

[BroJoeK]

"Hell, put some hot babes, explosions, gun fights and car chases in it to hold the viewers' attention."

Got it! Good luck. ;-)

[HKMk23]

“...riots...”

A. It wasn’t a “riot”
B. Whatever you call it, there was only one.

Love how the left can always count on us to capitulate the narrative by embracing their terms.

Not mad at you.
It’s just stupid, that’s all, and it irks me that it’s happened, ‘cuz it’s really a testament to our own weakness and lack of courage in our own convictions.

[minnesota_bound]

Ask the rinos if they care.

[semimojo]

So, what, you're saying there was no fraud and no "potentially illegal ballots"?

Can you read? I didn't say either of those things.

Let me say it again.

There was almost certainly fraud but Navarro doesn't identify any - only "irregularities".

Even if he identifies more "illegal ballots" than the vote margin, he doesn't even attempt to show which candidate those illegal votes went to, so what is the Senate or a court supposed to do with the information?

[Eagles6]

Great idea!

[Former Proud Canadian]

mark

[Trump Girl Kit Cat]

Peter Nevaro has done a complete report on the fraud but it is NOT getting out because social media sites take it down immediately!!

[BroJoeK]

"There was almost certainly fraud but Navarro doesn't identify any - only "irregularities".
Even if he identifies more "illegal ballots" than the vote margin, he doesn't even attempt to show which candidate those illegal votes went to, so what is the Senate or a court supposed to do with the information?"

Just so we're clear on this: I know almost nothing and understand even less of what went on when Team Trump took their cases to courts, to state legislatures and to Congress.
That is a total dark cloud to me -- don't know what arguments were made, what facts presented (or not) and what exactly the responses were.
All I know is that despite numerous attempts, nothing came of it all.

Now, on Navarro's report, I think it says there is hard data to support all their conclusions, enough data to justify closer inspections -- not just recounts, but thorough audits.
These should establish beyond reasonable doubt exactly how many "irregularities" were, in fact, illegal votes.
I think that's the purpose of Navarro's report -- to establish a "predicate" or even "probable cause" for more in-depth investigations.

And your problem with that is what, exactly?

[Eagles6]

I know.

Welcome to the Matrix/1984.

[SunkenCiv]

Thanks RACPE.

[cradle of freedom]

thanks.

[Falconspeed]

“Let us find favor with the Lord. He can take care of this mess in an instant!”

True. Everyone knows that the Nov. 2020 election was stolen. Noone enjoys saying the name “Bide..” The Lord has the power to expose all the facts now, or later. His choice.