Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congressional Challenge: Rep. Mo Brooks calls out the GOP’s “Surrender Caucus,” who refuse to join in with his plan to challenge fraudulent electoral college vote
Twitter ^ | 14 Dec 20 | The Election Wizard

Posted on 12/14/2020 6:56:27 PM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel

Congressional Challenge: Rep. Mo Brooks calls out the GOP’s “Surrender Caucus,” who refuse to join in with his plan to challenge fraudulent electoral college votes.

(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: twitter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: DoodleDawg

The Republicans want him gone worse than the Democrats.


41 posted on 12/15/2020 4:00:50 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

Rep Brooks is being kind. Better though a coward than known as a traitor I suppose


42 posted on 12/15/2020 4:04:05 AM PST by mo ("If you understand, no explanation is needed; if you don't understand, no explanation is possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sport
The Republicans want him gone worse than the Democrats.

Many in the establishment no doubt do.

I'll make a prediction. There is no doubt that once Trump is out of office he is going to face a number of personal and business crises in the coming years. Loans coming due, Deutsche Bank wanting to end their business relationship, the New York AG chomping at the bit to file tax and fraud and God knows what else charges, and on and on. I truly believe that deep in the shadows urging on all these people wanting to do Trump harm and assisting in any way they can will be Pence and Pompeo and Haley and Noem and Rubio and Cruz and all the other Republicans wanting to run again in 2024. If Trump goes down it'll be because of them more than the Democrats.

43 posted on 12/15/2020 4:07:03 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: mquinn

The “fly in the ointment” is the voter fraud thingy.

If the Senate and House do not accept the Trump Electors, they themselves have endorsed Electoral/Voter fraud-a felony.

The President, calls this doing it “the hard way”


44 posted on 12/15/2020 4:08:58 AM PST by mo ("If you understand, no explanation is needed; if you don't understand, no explanation is possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Arcadian Empire

New World Order.
They are using foreigners to steal the country from the citizens so that the USA can be subsumed to the UN.


45 posted on 12/15/2020 5:38:01 AM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizens Are Born Here of Citizen Parents|Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

I thought the House had to pass unanimously - 100%. I thought 1 vote plue 1 Senator could stop acceptance of electors.

Then vote goes to House where each state gets just 1 vote - and we win having more Repub states.

???????


46 posted on 12/15/2020 5:42:13 AM PST by Arlis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

This is not over!

Understand this: When all that is left to play out is over, Donald Trump has a better chance of winning than Joe Biden does.

Don’t listen to Democrat “experts” lying to you about the result of the competing lists submitted by the courageous legislators in seven states.

They will call all of the remaining necessary moves Trump has “desperate and doomed to failure.” His moves will be nether disparate nor doomed to failure.

When the seven state legislatures, that did so, submitted their competing list of Electoral College voters yesterday everything swung back to Trump’s favor.

The Electoral Count Act (ECA) of 1887 says each chamber of Congress will separately decide which slate of ‘dueling electors’ to accept, but the Senate will decide how the competing lists impact the Vice Presidential election and the House of Representatives will decide how the competing lists impact the Presidential election.

The legislators who submitted competing list of EC voters have acted under the authority of the United States Constitution. Therefore, they did not need permission from their governor to act.

The fact that the Governor of Michigan ultimately failed to stop the Legislators in her state from submitting a competing list of Electoral College voters goes a long way to affirming the legislator’s rights under the US Constitution.

What these courageous men and women did, is all that is important now.

The competing lists these states submitted will cause challenges to the lists submitted by the Secretaries of State in Arizona, New Mexico, Nevada, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin on January 5.

These challenges, which must be made in writing and signed by one Senator and one member of the House of Representatives, will be considered by both Houses and both must agree to reject the challenge or – presumably they stand.

So, the Constitution leans toward the challengers.
There would be two hours of debate allotted, but I don’t know if that would be two hours for each challenge or two aggregate hours covering all challenges.

Since all challenges would be on substantially the same grounds they probably would be covered in the two hour timeframe.

Considering the Electoral College vote values in each of the contested states, if the challenges involving just Pennsylvania – 20, Georgia – 16 and Arizona- 11 were upheld, they would result in a Trump victory at 279/259.

The evidence of voter fraud in each of these states is overwhelming to any fair observer.

What is more likely is that these challenges would either all be accepted or all be rejected since they would all be based on the same claims of fraud by Democrats. Winning all of these challenges would mean a 316/222 ECv win for Trump.

How it goes in each House-Senate first:
In the Senate, where only the winner of the vice presidential election is voted on, even if we lose both seats in the Georgia runoffs, a tie is produced and a Senate tie is broken by the President of the Senate who is Vice President Michael Pence.

Since they would be not be voting directly for or against Trump, the unreliable and sometimes Trump hostile core of Republicans in the Senate- Romney, Murkowski, Sasse and Collins would likely not try to hurt Trump. It is a safe bet Pence wins.

In the House of Representatives where only the winner of the presidential election considered:

Unlike in the Senate, where each member votes, the House of Representatives would choose the President by a vote from each state which would get just one vote. That voter would be determined by the Congressional delegation in each state.

The incoming House of Representatives will include a Republican advantage in 27 of the state delegations – a candidate needs 26 votes to win the White House.

If the two chambers disagree, we could end up in uncharted territory; and the matter would go to the Supreme Court. In that case the Court would have to be swayed by the “will of the people.”

It is not hard to imagine that the Justices would look at the established rampant Democrat voter fraud with no allegations of Republican voter fraud in this election and take “judicial notice” of it.

In the absence of anything else to consider (they will not accept a case from the Democrats asking them to change the constitution for them); it is hard to see how the Court could ignore the large number (315) of EVvs Trump will have gotten.

I believe that would weigh heavily in favor of finding for President Trump.

All of this means the Republican competing lists would eventually bring victory for President Trump.

So, after all our prayers, all our volunteer work, all our contributions, all our lawsuits and all our investigative work, we are in a good position to win.

In any contest, as time runs out, it is always best to be either a clear winner or in a position to win. Today we can say we are in a clear winner position that is much more preferable to Joe Biden’s position.

Media lies:
You definitely will not hear anything about how this is likely to play out and Trump will win.

The media will continue to ignore the competing lists or dishonestly call them desperate stunts.

They will keep pumping out their propaganda – we must keep praying for God’s help.

To make this process far less stressful we must win both seats in Georgia, please do what you can to help make this happen.


47 posted on 12/15/2020 8:54:38 AM PST by jmaroneps37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Thank you for this encouraging step-by-step description of what can happen with a contested election.


48 posted on 12/15/2020 9:02:29 AM PST by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Arlis
It takes 1 Senator and 1 Rep, in writing, to "officially" question the EC Votes (on a state by state basis). The only thing that does at that point, is trigger the 2 hour "debate" about the issue. Each member get's 1 time to speak, 5 minutes max.

The 1 vote per state scenario is ONLY if a candidate does not reach a majority of EC votes (currently, 270 if the full elector number is seated). Since biden has more than 270 at this point, the ONLY way for him to loose EC votes is if BOTH the Senate and the House agree (after those 2 hour "debates" for each state in dispute) that some of those votes should be tossed.

Of course, Pelosi's House would never agree to toss biden votes. That right there kills the process. Furthermore, with McConnel having now "congratulated" biden on the "win"...the Senate would reject it as well.

Counting Electoral Votes: An Overview of Procedures at the Joint Session, Including Objections by Members of Congress
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3911662/posts?page=26#26

Since the republican lead state legislatures failed in their duty to reject the fraud in their state elections, there is nothing this fed congress will do to stop the process.

The only thing left is the longest of long shots with some kind of hail mary type executive action...whatever that might be.

49 posted on 12/15/2020 9:51:37 AM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

What I thought. Sad. Thanks


50 posted on 12/15/2020 10:47:27 AM PST by Arlis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson