Posted on 12/14/2020 7:19:42 AM PST by TXnMA
For U.S. Citizens, there is no clearer or more sacred expression of the "Equal Protection Under Law" clause of our Constitution's 14th Amendment than the individual Citizen's vote -- commonly expressed as, "One Person; One Vote".
Use of "Dominion" Software for tallying or "tabulating" votes will be shown to be a de facto violation of "One Person; One vote."
Each individual's single vote is indivisible-- an integer, a whole number equal to one. Nor can any voter divide their vote between two choices; the entire unit vote must be devoted to a single choice.
Votes are counted -- not "calculated". There is no legal justification for "tabulation" methods or software that "calculate", "compute" or otherwise "manipulate" votes as anything other than single, whole number, integer objects.
Likewise, there is zero justification (aside from clear intent to commit fraud) for vote recording and tabulation equipment and/or software that treats votes as fractions, rather than as indivisible integers. Specifically, the "voting and tabulation" system of machines and software known variously as "Dominion", "DVM", "Sequoia", "Smartmatic", "Scytl", et alia, calculates votes as "floating-point decimal" fractions.
.
Even worse, "Dominion" has a designed-in "Feature" called, "Race Weighting" that re-allocates votes per a percentage ratio -- entered by an operator or administrator. Use of a documented Biden=55% to Trump=45% ratio will be demonstrated, and a reported Biden=125% to Trump=75% ratio will be illustrated.
Evidence of "Race Weighting" ratio cheating via re-assigning votes from one candidate to another abound -- as in this example from Virginia, which uses a Biden=55% to Trump=45% ratio. (The "54%" in the "Biden weighting" column was achieved by selective rounding before reporting. The actual "55%" batch results appear at right.
The "Biden = 55% : Trump="45%" ratio was applied to each individual vote batch. (Note the two identical batches at right -- overtinted in aqua. If the Biden and Trump votes are each rounded, the batch total is 20. if Buden & Trump are summed, then rounded -- the batch total is 21 votes. What is the starting batch total?
For illustrative purposes, a hypothetical exact one hundred (100)-vote batch (eliminating fractions) is depicted below:
However, DVM-type systems were used in all of the contested "battleground States".
By "normalizing" the "Weighting Ratio", (dividing both sides of the ratio by the larger of the two percentages) the impact on individual voters can be calculated:
Graphically, the impact on individual voters clearly displays inequality:
Even more dramatically, the use of a 125%:75% Biden:Trump "Race-Weighting" ratio was reported in at least one State:
That "3/5" value for the Trump voter should look familiar:
The 1787 "3/5 Compromise" valued slaves as "3/5 of a person" for purposes of census counting to determine representation. The Compromise" was repealed by the 14th Amendment.
Depicted graphically, that normalized 125%:75% weighting ratio shows the worth of a Trump voter to be only 3/5 of that of a Biden voter:
Is the value of any voting citizen in 2020 the same as that of a slave in 1787?
Inequalities do not have to be as drastic as depicted to violate the 14th amendment. Any voting inequality other than One person; One [Whole Integer] Vote renders all voters unequally represented.
Dominion® et al, software invites unequality by processing integer votes as decimal fractions. And it guarantees fraudulent unequality and vote theft by employing "Race Weighting Ratio" calculations.
That’s not funny even
I was posting what voting software should do.
You are posting what they actually did.
If you have that data in your post please let me know where it is. (About a subtraction from Trump and at the same time an increase of the same number to Biden)
That’s huge data evidence.
Great work, TXnMA. Even I can understand it and I'm the opposite of a techtard.
Don't listen to LS. He's over his head on this.
Well look at you, all saving the world and everything.
Oh -- before humblegunner goes all "bloggy" on me -- my site's not a blog
Might ought to ping folks when you mention them, otherwise you come off as a poosy.
IANAL
TMI, homo.
p
Stephen Miller: Donald Trump Allowed to Contest Election Until January 20
Don't think that was aimed at me -- but, I'll claim "OP Privilege": '-)
My 4th and 6th slides are actual data.
BTW & FYI, the "many entire counties exceeded that performance for Trump" link to the TX county that went 79.26% for Trump is the county where I'm Precinct Chairman. Without the two independents, we would have topped 80% for Trump...
TXnMA
TXnMA
You sure don't have a problem mentioning them, though.
That looks pretty much like a sissy move.
That's OK, though. You're old and probably starting to get scared
of falling and coughing and incontinence and confrontation.
You go on and save the world, grandpa.
Seen any good tunnels lately?
How did they recount? Did they put the same ballots through the same machines again? Or did they recount by hand?
https://commonsenseevaluation.com/2020/12/10/a-dominion-voting-machine-in-action/
"It'll even scan a batch of blank ballots and vote for whoever you tell it to"
Amazingly well done, TXnMA. Thank you!
I hope you have sent this around?
I think 29 or so states used Dominion, but from what I’ve read (not nearly enough, there is info overload) many othres used similar software or programs or whatever. But it seems that just because not all the states used Dominion, doesn’t this nullify the entire election? And then many other states seem to have used similarly cheating technology (and/or simple old fashioned fraud).
If you have not yet sent this out, please do so!
AZ had plenty of illegals voting, in addition to whatever else may have happened.
BTW, did you post the link to this FR post -- or to my original on Microlith.Com?
TXnMA
Ping to how Dominion created a fraudulent election.
They are having a hard time proving that. Unfortunate, but a fact.
It’s looking like out of 28,000 damaged ballots that were “adjusted,” about 550 may have been wrongly given to Biteme.
That’s pretty much where we are. The Dominion machines had paper ballots tied to them, so you couldn’t change one without simultaneously changing the other. The “illegals” by even Kelli Ward’s admission would only come to maybe 2,000 if every single one voted for Biteme.
Hand recount, machine re-recount.
I do. Because we have a paper ballot backup.
Every machine vote has a paper ballot. The paper ballots were recounted. If you’re going to cheat, and a machine is going to add 321 “votes” for Biteme at Yavapai County precinct 18, then someone at Yavapai County precinct 18 has to actually insert 321 ballots into the system there. This would have had to go on at every. single. polling. precinct. in the state, and every one would have to be close to dead on. You couldn’t have someone put in 2,000 paper ballots in Cochise 12 and the machine only says 100.
Go to twitter. @AZDataGuru Garrett Archer made a very convincing argument for this. He used to work elections here in AZ at the polling places for the GOP. He knows the system inside and out.
Is the thinking here that the fraud won't happen in 2022 or 2024? That the (D)'s will clean up the system?
Couple that, with a packed supreme court, 4 new/additional (D) Senators added to the 100 and tens of millions of foreigners given citizenship...It's increasingly difficult to see how Trump could do anything in 2024, regardless of whatever party he is a part of.
Considerint the Dominion methods, and all the methods used for creating fraudulent outcomes, imho tech experts can investigate to know for sure the actual real tally, and until then who knows. Plus illegals’ votes can be easily determined if the signatures are still connected to the ballots, find out of voters are citizens and registered or not. I read that a lot more illegals voted than 2000.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.