Posted on 12/14/2020 7:19:42 AM PST by TXnMA
For U.S. Citizens, there is no clearer or more sacred expression of the "Equal Protection Under Law" clause of our Constitution's 14th Amendment than the individual Citizen's vote -- commonly expressed as, "One Person; One Vote".
Use of "Dominion" Software for tallying or "tabulating" votes will be shown to be a de facto violation of "One Person; One vote."
Each individual's single vote is indivisible-- an integer, a whole number equal to one. Nor can any voter divide their vote between two choices; the entire unit vote must be devoted to a single choice.
Votes are counted -- not "calculated". There is no legal justification for "tabulation" methods or software that "calculate", "compute" or otherwise "manipulate" votes as anything other than single, whole number, integer objects.
Likewise, there is zero justification (aside from clear intent to commit fraud) for vote recording and tabulation equipment and/or software that treats votes as fractions, rather than as indivisible integers. Specifically, the "voting and tabulation" system of machines and software known variously as "Dominion", "DVM", "Sequoia", "Smartmatic", "Scytl", et alia, calculates votes as "floating-point decimal" fractions.
.
Even worse, "Dominion" has a designed-in "Feature" called, "Race Weighting" that re-allocates votes per a percentage ratio -- entered by an operator or administrator. Use of a documented Biden=55% to Trump=45% ratio will be demonstrated, and a reported Biden=125% to Trump=75% ratio will be illustrated.
Evidence of "Race Weighting" ratio cheating via re-assigning votes from one candidate to another abound -- as in this example from Virginia, which uses a Biden=55% to Trump=45% ratio. (The "54%" in the "Biden weighting" column was achieved by selective rounding before reporting. The actual "55%" batch results appear at right.
The "Biden = 55% : Trump="45%" ratio was applied to each individual vote batch. (Note the two identical batches at right -- overtinted in aqua. If the Biden and Trump votes are each rounded, the batch total is 20. if Buden & Trump are summed, then rounded -- the batch total is 21 votes. What is the starting batch total?
For illustrative purposes, a hypothetical exact one hundred (100)-vote batch (eliminating fractions) is depicted below:
However, DVM-type systems were used in all of the contested "battleground States".
By "normalizing" the "Weighting Ratio", (dividing both sides of the ratio by the larger of the two percentages) the impact on individual voters can be calculated:
Graphically, the impact on individual voters clearly displays inequality:
Even more dramatically, the use of a 125%:75% Biden:Trump "Race-Weighting" ratio was reported in at least one State:
That "3/5" value for the Trump voter should look familiar:
The 1787 "3/5 Compromise" valued slaves as "3/5 of a person" for purposes of census counting to determine representation. The Compromise" was repealed by the 14th Amendment.
Depicted graphically, that normalized 125%:75% weighting ratio shows the worth of a Trump voter to be only 3/5 of that of a Biden voter:
Is the value of any voting citizen in 2020 the same as that of a slave in 1787?
Inequalities do not have to be as drastic as depicted to violate the 14th amendment. Any voting inequality other than One person; One [Whole Integer] Vote renders all voters unequally represented.
Dominion® et al, software invites unequality by processing integer votes as decimal fractions. And it guarantees fraudulent unequality and vote theft by employing "Race Weighting Ratio" calculations.
How many lawfully cast ballots were marked with the Sharpie? Do the machines have the ‘green button’ designated for provisional voting? Ballots dumped into the green button file can easily be then dumped into biden’s totals and there is a physical ballot albeit a switched vote. And for straight ticket ballots the fraudulent switch amounts to false votes down ballot.
Also, we need to skip to Section 5 of the 14th Amendment:
“The Congress shall have power to enforce by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article”
Congress has been in session and Congress has done nothing to enforce the provisions of the 14th Amendment as it relates to the November 2020 election where US citizens had their voting privilege abridged.
I don’t know the number of sharpies, but it’s nearly impossible, I repeat, nearly impossible to “add” ballots to precisely match every precinct and every machine. And I get this from GOP election officials who have worked the system for years.
I think the only issue Kelli Ward is seriously looking at anymore is the one-time 35,000 “add” that SUPPOSEDLY occurred in Pima (Tucson). But no one yet has proven this. It was an assertion by an outside computer analyst who did not undergo cross examination. This would be possible, one time, to add 35,000 paper ballots-—but there was never ever a report of a sudden batch of PAPER ballots being added anywhere in AZ.
A post can add value for the reader. This of yours doesn't. His did.
[However having a “library” of blobs tells me that there may be a way to compare blobs to see how many match perfectly. Especially if the library is small]
______________________________________________
Sounds like the *brushes* in a digital graphics program. Probably they can be rotated, re-sized, perhaps stretched/compressed along one axis and otherwise made to appear different. Perhaps they can set up a programmed sequence of such manipulations that would allow a small library to become nearly *infinite* to the observer.
Not only would it become apparent to the naked eye after viewing the batch over time, I think there are programs that can detect such matches, even after manipulation.
I wonder if they are jpegs or other pictures on a different layer?
Congress has been in session and Congress has done nothing to enforce the provisions of the 14th Amendment as it relates to the November 2020 election where US citizens had their voting privilege abridged.
Congress has been in session and Congress has done nothing
It says Congress shall have the power to enforce this. It doesn't say that Executive or Judicial branches don't have that power. And you'll notice that 14A provisions have been liberally asserted and enforced by the other branches very freely in other areas, including where voting rights are concerned.
I don't see anything to suggest Executive and Judicial need to stand down on this.
Perhaps so. But a simple (Global) Constant setting the FPE to "Zero Decimal Places" should suffice...
TXnMA
:: It doesn’t even have to subtract. ::
That can be specifically coded not to happen.
The "Design to cheat" is so fundamental, I can't see how it can be defended.
TXnMA
FYI, I'm of Clan Macpherson descent -- and lived in Japan for three years... '-)
TXnMA
Dominion Voting Systems Uses Firm That Was Hacked: SolarWinds Software...
TXnMA
Nice presentation. So simple, even a democRat could get it.
Great work!
Another avenue of fraud is the “image reader” settings.
This is where ‘erroneous’ ballots are set aside for further adjudication.
If you set the image reader to a very sensitive level, any smudge - even the presence of an eyelash hair can kick out a ballot.
Adjudication is based on an election officials’s eye judgement.
Or, in some cases, adjudicated (illegally) off-shore.
Great work!
It is Rudy -- and especially Sidney -- who have the data.
I'm just pointing out the logic that drives a spike thru the heart of the fraud.
My data samples are from Dominion election reports. The "125% Biden : 75% Trump" weighting ratio came directly from the mouth of Sidney Powell -- multiple times.
Can you point out a fault in my LOGIC?
TXnMA
You could do better with an abacus.
68% error rate means it is not errors but intentional. An “error” means that with some frequency you provide a random output vs the correct output. A random output with 100% frequency gives you a 50 - 50 chance of getting a right or wrong answer.
Agreed.
I was not speaking specifically of Michigan, but other states that had the ability to alter the image reader settings.
/That/ didn’t have to rely on Dominion software.
“It doesn’t even have to subtract.”
You should be correct.
But YES, the SMOTE derived Smartmatic algorithm does need to subtract, as their “published” percent of total “ballots outstanding” has to subtract from Trump in order to keep the ballot dumps for Biden from forcing 150% ballot counts.
The algorithm is actually designed for “LEVELING”, which uses decimals, so to keep the ballot and election fraud from being visually noticed. However, the Trump vote overwhelmed the set percentage of “leveling” the algorithm was set to, hence the reason for the near in unison halts, in the early morning hours of NOV 4, in all “swing states”.
I literally saw with my own eyes, Trump vote subtractions of between 500 votes all the way to over 20,000, at the same time Biden increased by those numbers and greater. In several cases I saw the “outstanding ballots” percentage fluctuate significantly, surrounding the vote flipping.
In on case, in Fairfax County, VA, Trump lost 100,000 votes instantly, while Biden took the bump.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.