Posted on 12/11/2020 11:55:42 PM PST by RandFan
Rudy Giuliani:
“The case wasn’t rejected on the merits, the case was rejected on standing. So the answer to that is to bring the case now to the district court by the president, by some of the electors, alleging some of the same facts where there would be standing,” he said in a Friday interview on Newsmax.
“There’s nothing that prevents us from filing these cases immediately in the district court in which the president of course would have standing, some of the electors would have standing in that their constitutional rights have been violated,” he added.
“We’re not finished,” he concluded. "Believe me.”
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
It’s a fried calamari head, not octopus..
Which begs the question...why didn’t Rudy file this same case (in a District Court) against GA, PA, WI, MI on behalf of the President weeks ago?
I learned one thing today...
If my state secedes, no other states have the legal standing to stop us.
You are an ass
Pretty much right on
-— and Alito.
The Georgia case with 160K ineligible voters, including 66K underage voters is still in progress.
They tried to knock down some of the living out of state and PO box address vote numbers.
they have said nothing about the 66K underage voters.
Georgia Sec of State could knock that one down easily if it was wrong.
If 66K underage voter were allowed to vote (or someone used their identity to vote) that would require corrupt election officials and/or manipulation/hacking of the eligible voters list - probably both.
If they did it in Georgia, they probably did it in other states and the Trump campaign needs to check.
And, Pray for President Trump, and for the exposure and downfall of his wicked enemies !
Yesterday at this time, I still thought the USSC still had relevance, and that packing the court would matter.
It would seem that the packing has already happened.
Of course the courts can ignore scientific statistical evidence. They can use the specious “standing” argument to throw out any lawsuit they don’t want to touch.
Most importantly, they can find stuff in any constitution (US or state) that isn’t there, and they can unabashedly ignore stuff that is.
Antifa has done its job. The courts are quaking in their collective boots in fear of more riots, the riots that Harris promised us would happen if Trump was re-elected.
This isn’t about whether Rudy is competent or not. The best lawyer in the world can’t successfully argue facts in a court that is too afraid, too compromised, or too biased to do anything but sweep inconvenient suits out the door.
“Dershowitz says the Supremes simply do not want to touch this.”
You’d think that SCOTUS would give a crap about the kind of country they want to leave for their kids. Guess not. Of course, in the new society they’ll be in the elite class, so won’t have to suffer like the peons.
If SCOTUS too afraid to do their jobs then they need to give up their seats to others who have more courage. SCOTUS can’t screw us just because they lack balls. Don’t they think WWII soldiers were scared?
Come on!
Thank you for that update, Reverend.
Protests and rallies also continue.
When all government ...in little as in great things... shall be drawn to Washington as the center of all power; it will render powerless the checks provided of one government on another, and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated." -- Thomas Jefferson, 1821
LOL! I like your directness
The one aspect of secession that troubles me is that the process should really be the reverse, i.e., states loyal to the constitution should continue on as the United States and those unwilling to abide by the constitution should be removed from the union, although ideally only those (urban) portions that have really backed the illegal actions in question. So I envisage a reconstituted United States in which certain urban regions are placed outside the federal union and asked to define themselves as whatever they believe themselves to be, city states, colonies of some overseas power, ungovernable failed states, whatever ... for it is not a matter of states wanting to leave the United States so much as states wanting to reform the United States.
This would need to be “de facto” rather than “de jure” since no court could meaningfully rule on it anyway.
>> He is missing too many brain cells.
Nonsense.
>> Theres no excuse for not knowing it would not have standing.
Nonsense
>> a wino or crack head off the street would probably do better.
Nonsense
Lashing out in frustration solves nothing — but unfortunately, you’re in good company.
Accept that fact we’ll go to our graves fighting. And that no single individual is responsible for the saving the Country. Wake up every day knowing that we’re at war — and find a way to keep the peace at home while having unwavering commitment to fight the adversary.
Giuliani is a good man. Don’t besmirch his integrity because you’re not satisfied. There will be no satisfaction in our lifetime.
“Theres no excuse for not knowing it would not have standing.”
Of course the case had standing! SCOTUS majority wants Trump gone the same as other libs, and “standing” is a legal default cop-out.
Ok, so they resign and Biden fills their seats with communist judges.
Look, I share your frustration. The problem is the country is broken. You can’t compare judges with professional warfighters. They signed up for a different job which assumed a functioning republic. Or, they’re trying to pretend it’s still in tact to the best of their abilities because that’s the only job they know.
I wish they took the case, but the fraudulent result of the election is just a symptom of the rot that likely only patriots with rifles will someday soon have to fix.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.