Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doc maverick

Yesterday at this time, I still thought the USSC still had relevance, and that packing the court would matter.

It would seem that the packing has already happened.

Of course the courts can ignore scientific statistical evidence. They can use the specious “standing” argument to throw out any lawsuit they don’t want to touch.

Most importantly, they can find stuff in any constitution (US or state) that isn’t there, and they can unabashedly ignore stuff that is.

Antifa has done its job. The courts are quaking in their collective boots in fear of more riots, the riots that Harris promised us would happen if Trump was re-elected.

This isn’t about whether Rudy is competent or not. The best lawyer in the world can’t successfully argue facts in a court that is too afraid, too compromised, or too biased to do anything but sweep inconvenient suits out the door.


31 posted on 12/12/2020 1:12:03 AM PST by Fresh Wind ("This claim about election fraud is disputed.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Fresh Wind

They’re fudge-packers, All of them.


52 posted on 12/12/2020 1:54:04 AM PST by mabarker1 ((Congress- the opposite of PROGRESS!!! A fraud, a hypocrite, a liar. I'm a member of Congress !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Fresh Wind

If you go back to 2000, the court (the R judges anyway) gave wide latitude to the Secretary of State to make election decisions. The R judges were consistent in 2020, not surprisingly, the D judges were not.


116 posted on 12/12/2020 6:21:20 AM PST by alternatives? (If our borders are not secure, why fund an army?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson