Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Formally Dockets Texas Election Case Against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania And Wisconsin
Supreme Court of the United States ^ | December 8, 2020

Posted on 12/08/2020 12:40:02 PM PST by Zakeet

Update (1515ET): Just twelve hours after it was filed, the US Supreme Court has officially put Texas's lawsuit against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin on the docket, meaning the case will be heard.

Unable to post the image -- you'll have to click the link and see for yourselves.

(Excerpt) Read more at supremecourt.gov ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Georgia; US: Michigan; US: Pennsylvania; US: Texas; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: dsj03; electioncrime; electionfraud; scotus; supremecourt; texas; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-207 next last
To: Jim Noble

Just for the sake of discussion, would the SCOTUS be guilty of activism by fashioning a remedy that resulted in a contingent election?


181 posted on 12/08/2020 7:16:36 PM PST by PerConPat (A politician is an animal that can sit on a fence and yet keep both ears to the ground--Mencken )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long
Is the GA AG a conservative or a RINO?

Wouldn't it be ironic if he challenged his own state government?

182 posted on 12/08/2020 7:52:45 PM PST by Jess Kitting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Jess Kitting

Not sure....and, YES, it would be GLORIOUS if the GA AG joined in the TX AG suit.....to fight his own state!!!


183 posted on 12/08/2020 7:55:58 PM PST by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long
YES, it would be GLORIOUS if the GA AG joined in the TX AG suit.....to fight his own state!!!

Anyone out there from Georgia?

What would it take to get your state to join the growing coalition for the truth?

184 posted on 12/08/2020 7:59:29 PM PST by Jess Kitting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: OttawaFreeper; BrexitBen; Trump Girl Kit Cat

It’s been reported that Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and South Dakota are joining Texas in this suit, maybe more to follow.


185 posted on 12/08/2020 8:06:02 PM PST by SFConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Any originalist will refuse to hear this case. It is a classic nonjusticeable political question.

They address this in the filing. I didn't really understand their argument to get around it.

Part of the filing argues that the USSC is the only place that Texas can find relief within the time frame involved. But, there is a part of the process during the EV counting where states can object to the counting of certain states votes. If the USSC wants to punt, I can see them hanging their hat on that (and seems relevant to your political question view).

186 posted on 12/08/2020 8:49:35 PM PST by Database
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

Headline is wrong. Supreme Court’s website is right


187 posted on 12/08/2020 11:10:32 PM PST by JewishRighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

“Here are the Republican Attorneys General:”

NO WAY Montana will join this cause.

Though our ‘AG’ is a rEpublican, he’s the bonafide running mate of our diabolical gOvernor Bullock (received the exact amount of delegates in the Dem, primary as Commie Harris).

Will NEVER happen.


188 posted on 12/09/2020 5:43:36 AM PST by BBB333 (The Power Of Trump Compels You!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

“HOW can ANY of them not vote the same????”
____________________________________________________

I reads somewhere late yesterday that the SCOTUS vote to even take up the TX case was 6-3...

But, John Souter Roberts says there are no political Justices...haha


189 posted on 12/09/2020 7:47:51 AM PST by MCEscherHammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: MCEscherHammer

Ands I’m sick and tired of hearing that scotus might not take it up because they don’t want to get involved in elections. TOO BAD.....that’s your job....DO YOUR JOB.


190 posted on 12/09/2020 11:07:56 AM PST by Fawn ("My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge" Hosea 4:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: All

How many of those 4 states have a democrat Legislature? I imagine if were up to them, they would pick Biden anyway?


191 posted on 12/09/2020 11:34:37 AM PST by Fawn ("My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge" Hosea 4:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

It doesn’t look like Arizona, Idaho or Wyoming have joined yet.


192 posted on 12/09/2020 2:14:03 PM PST by Brown Deer (America First!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Fawn
How many of those 4 states have a democrat Legislature? I imagine if were up to them, they would pick Biden anyway?

None.

193 posted on 12/09/2020 2:17:14 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: reviled downesdad
Justice Thomas had some serious payback to meter out for sure. This is as best an opportunity that he will see.

If this matter makes it to the whole court, Justice Thomas will make his decision based on the law and not on personal grudges. Anyone who thinks otherwise doesn't know the man.

194 posted on 12/09/2020 2:22:26 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Hattie
Cruz maybe? He argued before SC when he was solicitor general in TX.

Texas filed the suit. If it gets to oral arguments then the Texas Solicitor General will argue it.

195 posted on 12/09/2020 2:23:36 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: pangaea6
Who will argue this?

The Texas Solicitor General probably. Unless the Texas Attorney General decides to do it.

196 posted on 12/09/2020 2:24:51 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Fawn
THEY IGNORED THE PENNSYLVANIA CASE AND TOOK THE TEXAS ONE!!

Kelly v. Pennsylvania was an appeal and the Supreme Court of hearing it or not. They declined to hear it. In Texas v. Pennsylvania the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction so they have to hear it.

197 posted on 12/09/2020 2:27:19 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer

It doesn’t look like Arizona, Idaho or Wyoming have joined yet.


They likely/hopefully will.

This is just a brief of support. I imagine these others will join in.

They better!!

Time to hound these AGs feet to the fire!

ID AG-

Lawrence Wasden

wasden@lawrencewasden.com
Phone:
208-466-5924
Fax:
208-466-5924
http://www.lawrencewasden.com

@lawrencewasden

AG AZ -

Mark Brnovich

@GeneralBrnovich

(602) 542-5025
Fax (602) 542-4085

WY AG -

Bridgette Hill

(307) 777-7841
FAX (307) 777-6869

Now.....what about AR, OH and NH???? Have they joined, yet??


198 posted on 12/09/2020 2:44:18 PM PST by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: AU72
Does that mean it’s been accepted by at least 4 justices, or does that come next?

It didn't need a vote, the Supreme Court has to take the case.

Even if it had required approval I wouldn't put too much faith in four votes to grant cert. Every decision that went 9 to 0 against the plaintiff got at least four votes in order to make it on the calendar.

199 posted on 12/09/2020 2:57:11 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Dershowitz calls this suit a “Hail Mary” pass: https://justthenews.com/podcasts/water-cooler-david-brody/dershowitz-tx-case-against-pa-hail-mary

Other legal options are needed.

This shouldn’t be the proverbial basket for all of the eggs.


200 posted on 12/10/2020 10:46:20 AM PST by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-207 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson