Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court rejects appeal to limit transgender students
The Associated Press ^ | December 7, 2020

Posted on 12/07/2020 8:22:59 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court declined Monday to take up an appeal from parents in Oregon who want to prevent transgender students from using locker rooms and bathrooms of the gender with which they identify, rather than their sex assigned at birth.

The case came from a school district near Salem, Oregon’s capital city. The federal appeals court in San Francisco had upheld a Dallas, Oregon, school district policy that allows transgender students to use bathrooms and locker rooms that align with their gender identity.

Parents sued over the policy in 2017, saying it caused embarrassment and stress.

A lower court refused to block the policy and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that ruling, writing that the school district did not violate students’ constitutional rights or a law that protects people from discrimination based on sex in education programs.

Similar lawsuits have been dismissed by courts in other parts of the country.

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gaynewsrooms; homofascism; homosexualagenda; maninadress; perferts; perverts; pinkjournalism; school; scotus; tranny; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 last
To: Rurudyne

remember when they said it was about the actions of consenting ADULTS in PRIVATE?

Now it is minors in public schools intruding on girls’ privacy.


101 posted on 12/07/2020 10:53:51 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Who built the cages, Joe?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

This is a huge mistake by the Supreme Court of the United States of America! Men who say they are women should not be allowed in women’s bathrooms and the same with women who say they are men should not be allowed in men’s bathrooms.


102 posted on 12/07/2020 10:59:46 AM PST by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

Heh, I recall from back in the 90s this one Democrat nitwit on a California city council (I seem to recall it was SF) expressing her outrage over someone giving testimony that faggots engaged in sodomy. She insisted that was not was homosexuals do.

But, yeah, it was always gonna go to the extreme when you consider that the engine behind the acceptance of homosexuality and it being championed in society is people who refuse to retain the knowledge of the Lord being turned over to reprobate minds.

Lawrence v Texas was only 17 years ago.


103 posted on 12/07/2020 11:01:13 AM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne

So many in the so-called historic gay rights movement leadership have pursued minors and even joined NAMBLA.

Even Human Rights Campaign is so infested.

Same with Drag Queen Story Hour.


104 posted on 12/07/2020 11:12:23 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Who built the cages, Joe?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Oneanddone

Their sex is assigned at birth by nature.


105 posted on 12/07/2020 11:15:15 AM PST by Crucial ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

I wish the North American Marlin Brando Look Alikes would just kick the shit out of that other NAMBLA already.

Actually, pretty much if anyone would.


106 posted on 12/07/2020 11:38:28 AM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Crucial

“Real Men”, “Real Women “ and “Crazy” would be the signs I would put up.


107 posted on 12/07/2020 11:40:19 AM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer; EinNYC
Oh, what a great idea! The girls will love it...MOT!


108 posted on 12/07/2020 11:43:41 AM PST by ApplegateRanch (Love me, love my guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Conservative Supreme Court?


109 posted on 12/07/2020 11:49:02 AM PST by Midwesterner53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Meatspace
>> This is why we must fight for a second term for President Trump. A second Term will allow up to three more Trump appointments to the Supreme Court. <<

If his second term SCOTUS appointments are as "good" as the ones from his first term, that won't help much.

Perhaps conservatives should stop fawning over EVERY judge advertised as an "originalist" and immediately rubber stamping them to a lifetime tenure with no questions asked.

110 posted on 12/07/2020 11:56:10 AM PST by BillyBoy ("States rights" is NOT a suicide pact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The big question is, what will parents do? Will they complain for a while and then go along with it, or will there be a mass exodus from the government school system?


111 posted on 12/07/2020 12:19:30 PM PST by Pining_4_TX (I'm old enough to remember when you actually had to be able to do something to be hired to do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I will bet that ‘Dallas’ really is ‘The Dalles’.


112 posted on 12/07/2020 12:38:14 PM PST by ridesthemiles ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

This is probably a valid result legally.

There is no constitutional right to have a one-sex bathroom. We do it because it is the right thing to do, not because the constitution requires it.

So, while our governments should be ALLOWED to restrict bathroom use based on waste organ type, they are not constitutionally required to do so.


113 posted on 12/07/2020 1:45:51 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

That’s not a command, swine.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
M. Thatcher made you look like a dumbass.


114 posted on 12/07/2020 10:10:36 PM PST by Valk Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson