Opinion: No proof of mass fraud that would change election result: Republican Sen. Rob Portman

USA Today via Yahoo! News | November 27, 2020 | by Sen. Rob Portman

[Oldeconomybuyer]

LINK ONLY per FreeRepublic posting guidelines.

https://news.yahoo.com/no-proof-mass-fraud-change-120136925.html

[JustaCowgirl]

Another one whose family bank accounts need to be checked for mysterious payments from China.

[PIF]

That is apparently not true. Some FReepers researched the question. It was on a thread yesterday.
—

And yes the HarrisBiden won 80M votes also in a fair election against the hated Orange Man, because all those millions are desperate for a wonder-filled socialist country as soon a possible,

[heshtesh]

These PUKES sure need Trump out of Washington.

[Prince of Space]

Oh, now it’s “mass fraud?” Here’s the progression over the last 3 weeks: no fraud, no significant fraud, no widespread fraud, no massive fraud, and no mass fraud. I wonder how much fraud would be a crime to these jackasses?

[Qiviut]

We need to be “taking names”. Seriously. These linguini-spined political creatures need to be GONE the next time they can be primaried.

[MayflowerMadam]

And he knows this how...?

[Lurkinanloomin]

Bush League Republican.

We should have replaced them when we had the chance.

[MayflowerMadam]

And I would think that if there is proven fraud, that state’s results should be completely chucked. IT’S ILLEGAL. Whether it would change results isn’t the issue. CHEATING IS THE ISSUE. They STOLE OUR VOTES!!!

[Candor7]

WRONGO PORTMAN:

The word is out:

600,000 fraudulent votes in Pennsylvania: The FRAUD in PA BUSTED! They got sloppy… The idiots added too many ballots files electronically and illegally to the system that it would have been physically impossible to add that many ballots in ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZg6CrxenoM&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR0dcSYh2mfZg4xZZof_WdDBJ_Fz-XrBy6VrXbajb_ZFejLjs4F3yUk_D60

[Robert DeLong]

Ohio, the squishy red state of course.

[School of Rational Thought]

No proof of voter fraud, even if I bothered to look for it.

[Candor7]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZg6CrxenoM&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR0dcSYh2mfZg4xZZof_WdDBJ_Fz-XrBy6VrXbajb_ZFejLjs4F3yUk_D60

[heshtesh]

The man is completely corrupted by his own stupidity and moral cowardice.

He proved his moral cowardice when his son came out of the closet years ago.

[GranTorino]

No. But he did change his view of gay marriage when his son turned gay. He should have resigned then.

[Fresh Wind]

Yes, and enough “Republicans” will be allowed to win to give the illusion of two parties, when in reality there is only one ruling party, as in:

The People’s Republic of China
The Democratic People’s Republic of North Korea
The Lao People’s Democratic Republic
The Republic of Cuba
The Socialist Republic of Vietnam

[Sirius Lee]

Another fallback position. First there was no fraud. Then there was fraud but not widespread. Now they're on to "widespread fraud, but not enough to overturn the result."

I suppose the next fallback will be: "Yes there was widespread fraud and it overturned the election, but it's too late now and we should just move on."

[nonsporting]

An enemy. Take names. Liberty tree.

[Fresh Wind]

Oh, and how could I forget the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela.

[Gay State Conservative]

I'm sure it's true that there was little fraud worth mentioning in Ohio. The Rats have known since November 2016 that Ohio is lost...so they didn't even try to steal the state.

[Fresh Wind]

And he knows this how...?

He heard it on CNN, of course.