KRAKEN RELEASED. 104 page GA suit

https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020.pdf ^ | Sidney Powell

[raynman33]

See link to pdf

[grey_whiskers]

All forensic evidence, all chain of custody records in Delaware County, PA are gone.— Cari Kelemen (@KelemenCari) November 25, 2020

Think about it. With no chain of custody (which by Federal Law, are required to be retained for 22 months following a Federal Election, and we haven't even passed ONE month yet,

🚨Delaware county is completely invalidated

take away 206,423 from Biden, 118,532 from Trump

PA is then 3,251,806 Biden, 3,259,142 Trump

🚨Trump wins PA on this county's invalidation ALONE https://t.co/Ht8kS3KVVH pic.twitter.com/5zqCPW0Uiq— 2020 is so 1984 (@skjultster) November 25, 2020

Think.

To have all these shenanigans, all in the same timeframe (after the polls close on Nov.3), and all in Biden's favor, all across the country...

that alone is enough for preponderance of the evidence.

(Hint: find another time in a US Presidential election in which the same candidate caught up in five or six states by tens or hundreds of thousands of absentee/mail-in votes, often counted without oversight, or openly changed from the other candidate (sworn eyewitness testimony), all at the same time.

Never happened?

Yeah, something fishy. Enough for full audits/hearings.

But given the sworn testimony of the person in Exhibit 1, who helped design the software to Maduro's specs, and given the raid on Scytl in Germany, we might not even need to bother with network analysis.

[grey_whiskers]

A mere recount is not the same thing as an audit.
There are technical terms involved here.
As well as the strong possibility alluded to in the filings, that the GA Governor and Secretary of State were literally bribed by the Chicoms to install hackable voting systems.

[Religion and Politics]

Which means the "hand recount" did not actually confirm what the computer actually counted.

The hand recount only counted what the computer printout told you it wants you to think was counted.

So neither you or anyone who voted there can determine what your vote was counted as, since you can't read the computer code yourself. You don't seem to outraged, considering.

Golden Eagle, thanks for the post. The point is that the counting of the ballots by hand was to "audit" what the machine system reported. The vote totals were for the most part confirmed. The largest errors were found to be because of errors in operation. i.e. ballots not originally counted, counts not uploaded correctly, etc. And even those weren't enough to outrage me.

I am sufficiently outraged at the signature matching stuff. But when the lawsuit claims foreign secret software manipulation of the vote counts after the potential of that happening already having been proven negative in Georgia, then it seems like grasping at straws.

Believe me, I am bummed, but for the life of me I don't understand why we are telling potential voters in the upcoming Senate runoffs that our voting system is being manipulated by foreigners. If I really thought that then I would be outraged. Because of the continuing attacks, I am now more sympathetic to Kemp and Raffensburger regarding about just where these attacks are coming from given the stakes of the upcoming Jan. 5, 2021 Senate runoffs.

[Golden Eagle]

Exactly. They’re knows as “Fraudits”...

[grey_whiskers]

(Eyebrows raised.) We *agree* on something.

Here, take a gander at *this* one. Note the date:

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1275024974579982336

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
RIGGED 2020 ELECTION: MILLIONS OF MAIL-IN BALLOTS WILL BE PRINTED BY FOREIGN COUNTRIES, AND OTHERS. IT WILL BE THE SCANDAL OF OUR TIMES!

6:16 AM · Jun 22, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
91.4K Retweets 31.5K Quote Tweets 286.9K Likes

[caww]

......“deadpan humor/sarcasm” etc. often do not translate well into a posted text” ......

I can agree to that, and why people take a risk when they don’t indicate it’s sarcasm...../S would suffice.

[Trailerpark Badass]

Yeah, I did.

[Religion and Politics]

There was no HAND recount in GA. That is precisely the problem. So of course the totals matched. Sidney talks about this in her case. Do a search of the document to see her argument.

There was a hand recount in GA that was conducted as part of what the legislature required as a "risk limiting audit" of the electronic voting system. There was not an auditing in the risk limiting audit of signatures on absentee ballots. That was not the purpose of the "audit". The people who conducted the hand recount were "auditors". There were two "auditors" per "audit table". There was one partisan observer allowed per 10 tables. This is what Powell refers to in her case, that sufficient observation was not allowed. She will not win that, especially since the recount confirmed the machine count. Had there been some suspicious results, then maybe this would have more import. You have to realize that Powell claims the electronic fraud occurred system wide, so there were many places that hand recounted that would have been glad to discover that the will of the voter was thwarted. So since there was no systematic electronic fraud, we ought to be looking for more massive localized fraud like in absentee ballots, and thus we are back to the signature matching to see if invalid ballots swamped the system.

[Golden Eagle]

The point is that the counting of the ballots by hand was to "audit" what the machine system reported.

I'm sorry Sir, but recounts of any type, and audits, are not synonymous. These are distinct technical terms.

The vote totals were for the most part confirmed.

Of the ballots they supposedly have, many of which have questionable origin, that an actual "audit" such as the requested signature matching process would likely disqualify.

when the lawsuit claims foreign secret software manipulation of the vote counts after the potential of that happening already having been proven negative in Georgia, then it seems like grasping at straws.

There's well established evidence these electronic voting companies have foreign ties, including foreign servers of their own that are involved in vote tabulation. Dominion has its headquarters in foreign country, for example. You really think that is acceptable, and beyond reproach?

I am now more sympathetic to Kemp and Raffensburger

So you still support Raffensburger, even knowing he made a secret under the table agreement with Democrats, to try to conduct the election in a manner that violated GA state law. Interesting.

[Mariner]

This case will live or die on negating results because of illegal processes, in violation of state laws.

Rudy is pursuing the right course.

Those who destroyed evidence will have to be prosecuted under state laws, if the AG decides to proceed.

But, to date, I have not seen or heard of anyone going for the gold here.

And the GOLD resides in the database logs and firewall logs. For some reason nobody seems to be after that.

Unless the DOJ/FBI is pursuing that angle quietly.

[Trailerpark Badass]

And since you can’t read QR codes, you don’t know who you voted for.

[RetiredArmy]

Sounds like that stinking Dimocrat bill a few years back that was a thousand or more pages and NO ONE HAD READ THE DAMNED THING, and they said they HAD TO PASS IT SO EVERYONE COULD READ THE DAMNED THING!!! Who ever heard of such nonsense. Stinking Marxists are going to destroy this Republic in record time. Hell Russia did not fall as fast as this mob will tear down everything they can before we can blink. They already got a start when their Marxist Gangs, Al-foul-fa as I call them, started tearing everything down, demanding everything be taken away and rename the military bases. Fine, rename the damned things. BUT DOWN HERE IN ALABAMA, Slickie Dickie Klinton closed Fort McCLELLAN and it is now a national guard base. Change that damned YANKEE named base to one of our southern generals or heroes. Near here in Jacksonville, AL there is a Major John Pelham buried that was killed in the War of Northern Aggression. General Lee called him the “Gallant Pelham.” Name it after him. He was from Jacksonville and the main street of town is named after Pelham. There is also a statue in the town square of a confederate soldier. The liberals wanted to take it down. The town’s people said NO!!! It is still there. To hell with the Marxists. They will probably have Seattle give up their statue of Lenin and move it to the lawn of the White House in honor of the winning uprising.

[dragnet2]

You must be a bit slow...I even followed my comment with a gif of a man rolling around the floor laughing, and I wrote...”Yuk yuk”.

Come on man!

[Religion and Politics]

I’m willing to suspend my disbelief to grant plausibility to what you’re saying about the paper recount simply being an exercise in verifying the count from Dominion machines/that they were not hacked. But it still ignores the fact that this recount was a sham from the start since it did absolutely nothing to remove fraudulent paper mail-in ballots from the pool of (re)counted votes. If anything, it was only an audit of the Dominion machines not an actual recount of legal votes. Shouldn’t counting all legal votes be what we care about here??

See the bolded portion above. That is exactly what the risk limiting audit was about. The SoS chose to order a 100% hand count of the paper ballots. But realize, Georgia insisted on the paper ballot for exactly this purpose. It worked just exactly as intended, and I don't see a lot of light to jam a knife into the results where it concerns Dominion in the state of Georgia. It looks like for the 2020 election PROCESS that just as the SoS said, the election was our best ever. I can't really argue that as regards the voting system. I think where we would find problems would be in the absentee ballots.

Here is what the SoS had to say concerning the Absentee Ballots. Realize that in Georgia you had to request an absentee ballot to vote by absentee ballot. There were a tightening of regulations where ID was required to request a ballot electronically. I believe there is controversy in the requesting by mail, as the absentee ballot was granted without significant verification measures (I think signature matching at this point of the process was not required to process the ballot request). Then we have the processing of the received absentee ballots. The largest grievance here is access to observe how all of this was done and the rejection of invalid ballots. Note the SoS's statement regarding that.

[ryderann]

“This could result in armed conflicts on the street...”

No doubt Trump would declare whatever he has to declare and call out the troops. I’d be cheering for sure.

[grey_whiskers]

Meanwhile, PA has its own little set of problems:

All forensic evidence, all chain of custody records in Delaware County, PA are gone.— Cari Kelemen (@KelemenCari) November 25, 2020

🚨Delaware county is completely invalidated

take away 206,423 from Biden, 118,532 from Trump

PA is then 3,251,806 Biden, 3,259,142 Trump

🚨Trump wins PA on this county's invalidation ALONE https://t.co/Ht8kS3KVVH pic.twitter.com/5zqCPW0Uiq— 2020 is so 1984 (@skjultster) November 25, 2020

What are the chances there are all these problems happened:

1) In the same election cycle

2) For the same national office

3) All in swing states

4) All in favor of the same candidate

5) All AFTER the *other* candidate had what looked like an insurmountable lead

6)_All of which mysteriously "stopped counting" and then resumed without proper oversight

7) All of which happened during the same time frame beginning in the middle of the night after polls closed

8) All of which involved SIGNIFICANT departures from both historical practice and against constitutional guarantees

Those 8 elements together (even without any commonality it vote counts, specific methods, or distribution of questionable / fraudulent votes within states, or common use of Dominion software)

ALREADY put it between "clear and convincing" and "beyond a reasonable doubt".

When you add the numbers (e.g. a single after-the-polls-closed drop of 600,000 votes, of which 570,000 went for Biden and 3200 for Trump)

When you add the multiple eyewitness affidavits and the complaints from three Democrat Party US Senators, from as recently as the prior Calendar Year, that Dominion software is hackable

and you add in

The eyewitness testimony (Exhibit 1) of a guy who helped design/implement Dominion, designed to steal elections

The network analysts pointing out that Iran and China had access to Dominion servers

this makes the evidence for Watergate look like child's play.

[Golden Eagle]

And the GOLD resides in the database logs and firewall logs. For some reason nobody seems to be after that.

In my opinion, the "gold" is the number of votes tabulated that exceeds the number of validated voters. These numbers are huge, and haven't been audited anywhere, yet.

Regarding the system logs, Rudy's computer scientist-witness testified to wanting this yesterday, and Sidney's lawsuit specifically asked for the seizure of devices by the court. They are working it. The fact that the precincts didn't hand them over for inspection, or co-inspections with both parties and the vendor, already implies guilt of some form.

[Mariner]

They should ask for the back-ups too, as some enterprising commie has certainly erased those on the system.

[Religion and Politics]

I'm sorry Sir, but recounts of any type, and audits, are not synonymous. These are distinct technical terms.

Golden Eagle, how do you suggest to audit the machine count without hand counting the ballots? The risk limiting audit was carried out by hand counting the entire universe of paper ballots. The two "counts" were compared and the Dominion voting system passed the requirements to be considered validated in the state of Georgia.

Note that after the audit and Georgia certified the election, the Trump campaign then requested a recount. That is a different matter than the risk limited audit of the voting system. Nevertheless, the totals of ballots and who they were cast for was produced by the hand counting of the paper ballots and they were compared to the machine counts produced by the Dominion system.

Please also note that my posts deal with allegation of machine fraud in Georgia. You asked the following:

There's well established evidence these electronic voting companies have foreign ties, including foreign servers of their own that are involved in vote tabulation. Dominion has its headquarters in foreign country, for example. You really think that is acceptable, and beyond reproach?

In the Georgia 2020 election, none of the above had any impact on the Georgia election. Apparently Georgia's order of the Dominion system allowed us to have confidence in the system by producing paper ballots that could later be compared to the machine counts. That was a wise choice since we were able to demonstrate this confidence.

You also asked this:

So you still support Raffensburger, even knowing he made a secret under the table agreement with Democrats, to try to conduct the election in a manner that violated GA state law. Interesting.

Do you know what was agreed to here? I believe that this is in reference to signature matching on absentee ballot REQUESTS. I'm not extremely happy about it, but I think it was better than sending ballots to everyone.

I have been a Kemp supporter and I still am. I never had any opinion or really otherwise supported Raffensburger before the election. However I do think that his claim of being thrown under the bus is true.

[MHGinTN]

You ARE being dishonest. The post to which you replied cited your dishonesty in claiming an aufit occurred. It did not.