Replies

Which means the "hand recount" did not actually confirm what the computer actually counted.
The hand recount only counted what the computer printout told you it wants you to think was counted.

So neither you or anyone who voted there can determine what your vote was counted as, since you can't read the computer code yourself. You don't seem to outraged, considering.

Golden Eagle, thanks for the post. The point is that the counting of the ballots by hand was to "audit" what the machine system reported. The vote totals were for the most part confirmed. The largest errors were found to be because of errors in operation. i.e. ballots not originally counted, counts not uploaded correctly, etc. And even those weren't enough to outrage me.

I am sufficiently outraged at the signature matching stuff. But when the lawsuit claims foreign secret software manipulation of the vote counts after the potential of that happening already having been proven negative in Georgia, then it seems like grasping at straws.

Believe me, I am bummed, but for the life of me I don't understand why we are telling potential voters in the upcoming Senate runoffs that our voting system is being manipulated by foreigners. If I really thought that then I would be outraged. Because of the continuing attacks, I am now more sympathetic to Kemp and Raffensburger regarding about just where these attacks are coming from given the stakes of the upcoming Jan. 5, 2021 Senate runoffs.

The point is that the counting of the ballots by hand was to "audit" what the machine system reported.

I'm sorry Sir, but recounts of any type, and audits, are not synonymous. These are distinct technical terms.

The vote totals were for the most part confirmed.

Of the ballots they supposedly have, many of which have questionable origin, that an actual "audit" such as the requested signature matching process would likely disqualify.

when the lawsuit claims foreign secret software manipulation of the vote counts after the potential of that happening already having been proven negative in Georgia, then it seems like grasping at straws.

There's well established evidence these electronic voting companies have foreign ties, including foreign servers of their own that are involved in vote tabulation. Dominion has its headquarters in foreign country, for example. You really think that is acceptable, and beyond reproach?

I am now more sympathetic to Kemp and Raffensburger

So you still support Raffensburger, even knowing he made a secret under the table agreement with Democrats, to try to conduct the election in a manner that violated GA state law. Interesting.