Posted on 11/17/2020 10:43:37 AM PST by RummyChick
Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey on Wednesday told lawmakers that it was a “mistake” to censor the acting commissioner of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) over a tweet about the wall at the southern border -- as the company faces accusations of political bias.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Jack did a little grooming for his hearing today so he doesnt look so much like Howard Hughes
also Hunter biden story
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/facebook-twitter-grilled-hunter-biden-story-hearing-dorsey
“Mistakes were made”
This guy makes an awful lot of mistakes. Should he be running a company?
Funny, these mistakes always seem to hurt free-speech and Conservatives. Notice how the standard protocol is that it;s better to seek (faux) forgivness rather than to ask permission.
Dr. Laura would say something like, “wearing different color socks is a mistake. This was something else.”
Dorsey is a liar.
Lotta mistakes with no downside.
A regulator would say that repeat offenses without evidence of new controls around a failing process would be a problem...
This is how democrats roll. They abuse republicans and then say it was a mistake and they promise to never make the same mistake on democrats. They’ve learned their lesson.
Eff that little nose-ringed thug.
He has a propensity for making mistakes.
What he really needs is his lights punched out. Same for that other twerp.
Yeah, that’s the ticket!
I wonder if he’s seen Morgan Fairchild naked?!
Loved that remark about having a neutral outfit to help him out -—THE POYNTER INSTITUTE !!!
————Owner of-— the St.Pete Times
Wada anus......
Kennedy just nailed both of them by asking “Do you have someone protecting you from disinformation when you read the news? (or something like that)
He basically told them “If you are smart enough to decipher truth from fiction, why can’t the public?”
NOW you tell us, a full three weeks after the censoring was done.
That’s grooming? I think I still see some dried oatmeal in his beard. It might be something else. Some sort of lifeform.
What’s the sense of getting him to repeatedly admit they were wrong violating peoples’ freedom of speech, when nothing is going to be done about it anyway?
+5
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.