Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barrett to face senators on health care, legal precedent
The Associated Press ^ | October 13, 2020 | By MARK SHERMAN, LISA MASCARO and MARY CLARE JALONICK

Posted on 10/13/2020 3:30:24 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett will face senators’ questions over her approach to health care, legal precedent and even the presidential election during a second day of confirmation hearings on track to lock in a conservative court majority for years to come.

The mood is likely to shift to a more confrontational tone as Barrett, an appellate court judge with very little trial court experience, is grilled in 30-minute segments Tuesday by Democrats gravely opposed to President Donald Trump’s nominee, yet virtually powerless to stop her rise. Republicans are rushing her to confirmation before Election Day.

“This should not be President Trump’s judge,” said Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Democrats say the winner of the presidential election should choose the nominee.

“This should be your judge,” she said.

Barrett presented her approach to the law as conservative and fair on Monday at the start of fast-tracked confirmation hearings. Democrats cast her as a threat to Americans’ health care coverage during the coronavirus pandemic.

With her husband and six of their seven children behind her in a hearing room off-limits to the public and altered for COVID-19 risks, Barrett delivered views at odds with the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the liberal icon whose seat Trump nominated her to fill, laying out a judicial philosophy she has likened to that of her conservative mentor, the late Justice Antonin Scalia.

“Courts are not designed to solve every problem or right every wrong in our public life,” declared the 48-year-old federal appeals court judge, removing the protective mask she wore most of the day to read from a prepared statement.

Americans “deserve an independent Supreme Court that interprets our Constitution and laws as they are written,” Barrett told the committee.

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: election2020; scotus

Sen. Mazie Hirono, the dumbest member of the US Senate, wears a mask showing former Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg during a confirmation hearing for Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

1 posted on 10/13/2020 3:30:24 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
an appellate court judge with very little trial court experience,

Why didn't the AP consider this a problem with Justice Kagan?

2 posted on 10/13/2020 3:35:59 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob (Mocking Liberals is not only a right, but the duty of all Americans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“Sen. Mazie Hirono, the dumbest member of the US Senate,...”
That, Sir, is a brazen assertion, to which several other liberal senators may take exception, as they vie for that title.


3 posted on 10/13/2020 3:39:20 AM PDT by ArtDodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“Republicans are rushing her to confirmation before Election Day”

It took 3 AP journos to write up all that bias


4 posted on 10/13/2020 3:45:42 AM PDT by ReaganGeneration2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The mask will remind Masey just how selfish a person Ruth was.


5 posted on 10/13/2020 3:56:16 AM PDT by Mashood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The Amy Coney Barrett hearings will have to precede without me. I have zero interest in watching Lindsey Graham’s mess.


6 posted on 10/13/2020 4:10:09 AM PDT by JonPreston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

“an appellate court judge with very little trial court experience,

Why didn’t the AP consider this a problem with Justice Kagan?”

Also, The Supreme Court IS an appellate court!


7 posted on 10/13/2020 4:18:05 AM PDT by Castigar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I thought they weren’t suppose to discuss future cases that might come up.


8 posted on 10/13/2020 4:41:17 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

9 posted on 10/13/2020 5:06:14 AM PDT by spokeshave (White Confederate statue kills black man......Another month of protests.... (HT to seawolf101))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I have to say I’m disappointed with Senate Dems. Last SCOTUS hearing they framed the nominee as a gang rapist & lined up a ton of “accusers” to fabricate stories about him. Imagine how much effort & organizational skill that required. But this time around it looks like they’re not even trying. Putting up a bunch of lame posters in the room? Come on, man!!


10 posted on 10/13/2020 5:38:58 AM PDT by splash73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Are these people still in high school? Never emotionally advanced beyond the age of 15.


11 posted on 10/13/2020 6:39:03 AM PDT by alabama_heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson