Yeah they don’t use nooses anymore, they use the internet to hang him in the court of public opinion to try to destroy a very good man.
Obergefell should be rescinded, and marriage law should reflect the ideal of one man and one woman for life.
Amen. May God let it be so.
Activist justices know that they’re probably not going to be removed by the corrupt, post-17th Amendment ratification, divided Senate even if they get impeached by House.
So it’s up to us patriots to first fix Congress by electing a new patriot Congress that will fix the corrupt Supreme Court with impeachment and removal from office, followed by confirmation] of new, Constitution-respecting patriot justices.
Send “Orange Man Bad” federal and state government desperate Democrats home in November!
Supporting PDJT with a new patriot Congress and state government leaders that will promise to fully support his already excellent work for MAGA and stopping SARS-CoV-2 will effectively give fast-working Trump a “third term” in office imo.
I don’t see any problem with voting Republican ticket for 2020 elections.
Insights welcome.
Because of the way most of the Justices on the Court have been treated by the Press, I wonder if they would be susceptible to upholding common sense licensing and regulations on Commercial Speech labeled as News??
“Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones.
In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.”
(New Testament, Romans 1:26,27)
The day before the Obergefell ruling, regular citizens were on the legal side of moral thought and discussion. The next day, the Supremes moved the line so that suddenly regular folks were on the illegal side.
What could go wrong.
“... conservative Christians and others who hold that marriage is between one man and one woman.”
Ummm, no. God is the one who holds that it is one man/one woman.
It looks to me that heterosexual marriage is poised to collapse. The young feel it’s too much of a hassle, can cause poverty iit ends in divorce and really women and men just aren’t what they used to be by design. We’re staring at the end of civilization, imho.
And soon we hope to hear, “And, heeeeere’s Amy!”.
She can help fix a number of bad precedents.
I think all of the Obergefell decision was wrong.
I think the only same-sex “marriage” ruling that could be Constitutional, to my mind, would have been that if a state decides to have a “same-sex” marriage law that would not offend the U.S. Constitution, but nothing in the Constitution demands that all states have such a law. My objection to Obergefell is broader than just matters of religious liberty.
As far as states having a same-sex “marriage law”, I have always thought that in comparison to preexisting states’ Civil Partnership laws (California and New Jersey for example), it was unnecessary to change the definition of marriage just to provide the legal protections for Civil Partners in their shared personal and financial matters.
No. The “marriage” matter was not about such legal matters. It was done to SOCIALLY enforce the acceptance of “same sex marriage” and intrude that social matter into a legal enforcement.
That legal matter is not the only legal matter where the Left has, virtually, forced the term “same” to replace what had previously accepted and acceptable as “equal”. This is social change enforced by government fiat, not by any natural, historical, dynamic process of freely chosen associations of the people. It is part of the Marxist agenda of destroying western culture.