Posted on 09/25/2020 12:23:24 PM PDT by robowombat
The MEMRI Daily: September 25, 2020
IRGC Commander-In-Chief Gen. Hossein Salami: U.S. Is Incapable Of Waging War Against Iran, Its Weapons Are Outdated, Trump Inexperienced, Cannot Even Manage A Pandemic; We Can Set Fire To U.S. Bases, Interests In The Region
MEMRI TV Clip No. 8303
IRGC Commander-In-Chief Gen. Hossein Salami: U.S. Is Incapable Of Waging War Against Iran, Its Weapons Are Outdated, Trump Inexperienced, Cannot Even Manage A Pandemic; We Can Set Fire To U.S. Bases, Interests In The Region
donate_button_email.jpg new icon image.jpg
The following is a complimentary offering from the MEMRI Iran Threat Monitor Project (ITMP). For more information, write to memri@memri.org with "ITMP Subscription" in the subject line.
General Hossein Salami, commander-in-chief of the IRGC referred to U.S. President Donald Trump's reaction to a possible Iranian retaliation for the killing of IRGC Qods Force Commander Qasem Soleimani in an interview with Iran's Channel 1 TV, on September 19, 2020. In the interview, General Salami said that President Trump lacks any necessary knowledge and the political and military experience to wage war against Iran so he resorts to exaggerating the proportions of an American response to an Iranian act of retaliation. He continued to say that the American military is incapable of engaging in a war with Iran, that its weapons are outdated, that the U.S. economy cannot support prolonged military conflict, and that the American regime cannot even manage a pandemic.
General Salami said that Iran is capable of setting fire to American bases and interests in the region, and it can conquer all of its bases. He continued to say that Iran has been perfecting its "defensive capabilities" since the Iran-Iraq war ended, so it is prepared to wage war against the U.S., protect Iran from defeat, and win this war. General Salami added that Iran has "thousands of regiments on the ground." Referring to U.S. President Trump's statement that an American response to a possible Iranian retaliation for the killing of Soleimani, would be "1,000 times greater," General Salami said that this is completely unfathomable. He said that if President Trump had suggested that the American response would be two or three times as strong as the Iranian attack, this would be a plausible enough exaggeration for the purpose of psychological warfare.
General Salami said that the U.S. is working under the mistaken assumption that Iran would retaliate for the killing of Soleimani by assassinating the American ambassador to South Africa. However, General Soleimani said that this would be ridiculous because Iran is an honorable and noble nation and it would not assassinate someone who had no part in the killing of Soleimani. He said that the best revenge would be to defeat "the hegemonic order [of the West]." General Salami stated that defeating the American regime would be the most appropriate vengeance for the blood of Soleimani, not the killing of "of some soldiers or an ambassador somewhere."
General Hossein Salami: "I would like to reassure the dear and honorable people of Islamic Iran that no current power – American included – is in a position to wage a new war against the people of Iran.
m8303.JPG
m8303a.JPG
[...]
"When the leader of a so-called great country like America lacks the necessary knowledge and political experience, and is not deeply acquainted with military force, having not experienced war, it is only natural that he would turn to blowing figures out of proportions on a scale that is beyond the imagination of any human being. The American military today is not an army capable of operating in a widespread manner across the globe, nor is it capable of participating in a large war, such as one against Iran. All the weapons of the [U.S.] military date several decades back.
m8303b.JPG
[...]
"The economic indexes in America do not allow it to wage a large and prolonged war. America is capable of answering the basic needs of public under its management. It could not even manage a pandemic – something that was accomplished by several much weaker countries. It is incapable of running a war.
m8303c.JPG
m8303d.JPG
[...]
"If the Americans want to fight our country, they will have to be present in the region. They cannot fight us from outside this region. They must position themselves in the region and then fight us. When they are stationed anywhere in the region, they are under our eyes and our bullets. We can set fire to all American interests and bases in the region simultaneously. We can conquer all their bases. They will have to deal with the loss of lives on a very large scale each day. We can sweep through the entire region. The power we have amassed has taken into consideration the most pessimistic scenario of a wide-scale war against America and its coalition of forces. From the moment the [Iran-Iraq] War of Holy Defense ended, we have been expanding our defensive forces, with one thing in mind: That in a wide-scale and comprehensive war with the U.S., we would be able not just to avoid defeat, but also to win.
m8303e.JPG
m8303f.JPG
[...]
"Our forces must number thousands of regiments on the ground. They can be on the move, and if they do, they will take over all the American interests and bases in the region and set them on fire.
[...]
"When someone says that the response will be '1,000 times greater,' this experience is so exaggerated that it is completely unfathomable. Even an exaggeration should be plausible. Had the American President said: 'Our response will be 2-3 times greater...'"
Interviewer: "It would have been somewhat acceptable..."
Salami: "Right. We would have said that this is partly psychological warfare and, in part, close to the truth, and they want to respond in a more extreme way. It is very natural that... In response to what did he say that? In response to their mistaken assumption that we decided to avenge the blood of the great commander of the Islamic front [Soleimani], by assassinating the American ambassador in South Africa. This is a ridiculous and laughable assumption. Why? Because we are honorable people. We are a noble nation. In retaliation for the blood of this great man, we would never assassinate and kill someone who had no part in this. Our revenge [will be] fair and honorable. What would taste like revenge for [the killing] of General Soleimani and would satisfy the Iranian people other than defeating the hegemonic order [of the West]?
[...]
"The price for [Soleimani's] martyrdom and assassination must be paid by the political order of America. It is the hegemonic order, in which such decisions are made that must collapse. Defeating this regime will be the blood vengeance of Hajj Qassem Soleimani, not the killing of some soldiers or an ambassador somewhere."
Salami ali kum !
That’s a silly concept.
Tired, maybe. Our troops have fighting since 2002.
Worn out, maybe. War wreaks pretty dreadful wear and tear on stuff. When was the last time we got a new M-1 tank?
Overextended, maybe. We are in waaaaaaay to many places.
But outdated? Don’t think so. There might be more advanced aircraft or weapons. MIGHT be. But the folks that built them can’t afford to deploy them.
Our biggest issue with destroying Iran would be operating in the constricted waters of the Gulf. That would leave ships vulnerable to anti-ship missiles with little warning. Mines would also be a major threat.
In any case, unless the Iranians do something REALLY stupid we ain’t goin’ there.
“They’d better hide Salami.”
Why? I don’t think we’re going after this guy, I mean from the looks of it he might be an unwitting asset for us. LOL
Hmm well we could see I guess
We do need force modernization, and there is progress being made, like the JLTV (HMMWV replacement) and the AMPV (M113 replacement). The M1A3 is now being fielded to some units.
But, a lot of the Army’s big systems like the Bradley, Apache, and Black Hawk are 1980s era developments. We’ve gotten very proficient at counterinsurgency that for a while, we took our eye off the ball of conventional war, but there has been a pivot back to that. I think we’ll see more. The JLTV is definitely needed.
If he Really believes that, boy will he be surprised !!!
He might want to look up next time he goes out to his car.......
This guy has to be on the Biden Campaign Team. When does he start at MSNBC?
Me thinks the lady, she doeth protest to much
Any way, the USA is not going to war and kill Iran.
The new coalition of the Gulf States and Israel are going to kill Iran. They are already in a shooting war and if it gets worse, they take out the mullahs
I hope the designers of JLTV keep in mind that we tried to turn the HMMWV into a light armored car and make appropriate allowances.
I prefer General Bologna
Give him a helping hand.
Pretty sure it was a reference to hiding THE salami.
Salami is sure dealing out the baloney.
Keep taunting Pres Trump, sir.
And keep your will updated.
This idiot is starting to believe his Russian buddies.
Hey Salami! The Iraqi Air Force took out Kharg Island back in the 80s. One egg dropped from a made in America F-35 will take it out now. Just ask Soleimani how “out dated “ our weapons are. LOL!
Hahahahah, Hahahahahaha, I guess I’m a little slow today.
Thanks for the heads-up.
Lockheed, Boeing, and Raytheon marketing are sending him bouquets.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.