Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California Legislature Passes Bill Reducing Penalties for Oral, Anal Sex with Willing Children
Breitbart ^ | 09/03/2020 | Susan Berry

Posted on 09/03/2020 8:36:29 AM PDT by mplc51

According to SB 145, the legislation “would exempt from mandatory registration” as a sex offender “a person convicted of certain offenses involving minors if the person is not more than 10 years older than the minor and if that offense is the only one requiring the person to register.”

The measure would allow a judge to decide if an adult who engages in oral or anal sex with a child must register as a sex offender if that person is within ten years of the age of the victim.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; children; gay; gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; pederast; pederastagenda; pederasty; sodomites; sodomy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: mplc51

When it comes to sex, there is no such thing as a “consenting child”. Age of consent is written into law for a reason.

Now various venues may determine that the age of consent occurs at different significant events in life, and it does, but the rules and case law that have built up around what is appropriate and what is not have been based pretty much on some amorphous definition of “maturity”, which means different things to different people. Is the age upon which the child may be capable of reproduction? Not all people are able to reproduce, some never will. It is the age at which the child may declare “emancipation”? Again, there are several things that argue the child is not fully mature in many ways.

A child of three years, or ten, or even sixteen, does not yet have enough life experience to give informed consent.

Precocious does not equal mature.


21 posted on 09/03/2020 8:50:42 AM PDT by alloysteel ("The Best Is Yet to Come "- theme of 2020 RNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MPJackal
Obviously you think heterosexuals do not engage in either practice. Did you miss the '90s?

This might be the California version of a "Romeo and Juliet" exception where older teenagers who consensually engage in sexual activity are not held to the same standard as child predators (teachers, coaches, parents, aunts, uncles). I assume age of consent is still 18 in California. In many states it's 16.

22 posted on 09/03/2020 8:50:46 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Vote Giant Meteor in 2020)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

“willing”


23 posted on 09/03/2020 8:50:48 AM PDT by AppyPappy (How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

Welcome to Pedofornia, you will now surrender your children.


24 posted on 09/03/2020 8:50:50 AM PDT by yuleeyahoo (The nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master and deserves one. Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman; All

“So, how many of the congress critters in cali are members of ‘nambla’?”

I’m betting shifty Schiff. Any takers?


25 posted on 09/03/2020 8:52:14 AM PDT by ProudVet97
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

Exactly. I think they try to “sell” the concept with the idea of a 26-year-old and a 16-year-old, or something. Wrong, of course, but at least some people might say “I get it”.

But the reality is what you point out — 15 and 5, 20 and 10, etc.

Sick. And clearly this is aimed at homosexuals who like ‘em young.


26 posted on 09/03/2020 8:53:31 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

Sure, let’s perpetuate a common stereotype about gay men IN LEGISLATION!!!


27 posted on 09/03/2020 8:53:46 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (The Constitution guarantees the States protection against insurrection. Act now, Mr. President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Neither should be granted leniency. 10 years is way too large for a “Romeo and Juliet” exception.


28 posted on 09/03/2020 8:55:29 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (The Constitution guarantees the States protection against insurrection. Act now, Mr. President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides
THE lgbtqlmnop crowd runs from nambla whenever you link the two together.

But that's what the homosexual movement has been about....the ability to have sex with underage children.

It is a sick and depraved mind.

29 posted on 09/03/2020 8:58:44 AM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

A child of three years, or ten, or even sixteen, does not yet have enough life experience to give informed consent.

____________________________________________________

I’ll buy the first two age groups, but a person can get married in Alabama at 16 with parental consent (and if they have been emancipated). There may be a few other hoops they have to jump through.

Here in Georgia it used to be 16 with parental consent, but now it’s up to 17.


30 posted on 09/03/2020 8:59:52 AM PDT by Bishop_Malachi (Liberal Socialism - A philosophy which advocates spreading a low standard of living equally.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MPJackal

“Why just oral and anal? Gay agenda?”
**************************************
Most definitely appears that way.


31 posted on 09/03/2020 9:00:10 AM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

The faggot rep claims this is to end discrimination against alphabet children. BS. They want freedom to diddle children. I say they and all other alphabet people should be passionately discriminated against. Queer behavior should not be tolerated in normal society. Queers who molest children should be dealt with in the harshest manner. If you think I’m harsh and want to look for the silver lining, think that the perp will look back on the worst man could do to him as a pleasant Sunday picnic compared to what he will experience in the hereafter.


32 posted on 09/03/2020 9:01:01 AM PDT by bk1000 (Banned from Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

Aw, gee that’s a shame Rosenbaum the Pedophile that attacked Rittenhouse for which he was subsequently shot (though not proven it was Rittenhouse) was unable to take advantage of California SB 145 before his demise.


33 posted on 09/03/2020 9:04:28 AM PDT by griswold3 (Democratic Socialism is Slavery by Mob Rule)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beethovenfan

“Where are we going and why am I in this hand basket”?


34 posted on 09/03/2020 9:07:04 AM PDT by asformeandformyhouse (I've been listening to a lot of rap music lately. Mostly at red lights and stop signs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mplc51
😱
35 posted on 09/03/2020 9:09:08 AM PDT by Pajamajan ( Pray for our nation. Thank the Lord for everything you have. Don't wait. Do it] today.[)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

With all due respect to our CA FReepers, all the beautiful scenery/weather in the world simply ain’t worth it.

/.02


36 posted on 09/03/2020 9:12:37 AM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

Harvey Milk is smiling up to us from hell.


37 posted on 09/03/2020 9:13:39 AM PDT by forgotten man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplc51
I'm surprised. NOT!
38 posted on 09/03/2020 9:13:44 AM PDT by null and void (The Left weaponizes everything in the service of tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MPJackal

Because Weiner, the author of the bill, can suck start a leaf blower. It would never occur to him to include those ucky breeder things.


39 posted on 09/03/2020 9:14:47 AM PDT by jonascord (First rule of the Dunning-Kruger Club is that you do not know you are in the Dunning-Kruger club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mplc51
Here's the great man sponsoring this:

The "man" from NAMBLA.

40 posted on 09/03/2020 9:14:51 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson