Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MPJackal
Obviously you think heterosexuals do not engage in either practice. Did you miss the '90s?

This might be the California version of a "Romeo and Juliet" exception where older teenagers who consensually engage in sexual activity are not held to the same standard as child predators (teachers, coaches, parents, aunts, uncles). I assume age of consent is still 18 in California. In many states it's 16.

22 posted on 09/03/2020 8:50:46 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Vote Giant Meteor in 2020)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: newzjunkey

It’s homosexuals. These laws have in mind that it’s statistically NORMAL for homosexuals to pursue minors for sex.


69 posted on 09/03/2020 10:06:25 AM PDT by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: newzjunkey
“ Obviously you think heterosexuals do not engage in either practice. Did you miss the ‘90s?
This might be the California version of a “Romeo and Juliet” exception where older teenagers who consensually engage in sexual activity are not held to the same standard as child predators (teachers, coaches, parents, aunts, uncles). I assume age of consent is still 18 in California. In many states it's 16.”

No I get that. Just wondering why vaginal intercourse is not included. The one activity gays don’t participate in. And I hear you on sex between consenting teenagers. But with your two examples, the youngster could be as young as 8 or 6. And I would call that predatory.

90 posted on 09/03/2020 4:00:44 PM PDT by MPJackal ("From my cold dead hands.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson