Posted on 08/30/2020 1:25:33 AM PDT by know.your.why
I have great news for everyone! Even democrats! Major breakthrough in this COVID-19 monstrous hoax and fakery. The CDC has just changed how it reports COVID-19 deaths. It is now reporting that only 6% six percent of all COVID listed deaths are now due to COVID alone. In other words, only 6% of the approx. 170,000 American deaths (about 9,200 deaths) are attributable to COVID-19 alone. This is a major breakthrough. Please report it. Be well.
(Excerpt) Read more at bitchute.com ...
The above change was necessary because of the manner in which America records deaths for COVID-19. On Wednesday, April 8th, 2020, at a White House coronavirus press conference, task force member Dr. Deborah Birx said that while some countries are reporting coronavirus fatality numbers differently, in the U.S. you are counted as a victim of the pandemic if you die while testing positive for the virus, even if something else causes your death.
No more co-morbidities. What are co-morbidities? Man killed in shark attack, dies of COVID-19. Parachute fails to open, skydiver dies of COVID-19. Family burnt to a crisp by overheating on CNN lies, dies of COVID-19. CDC now says only six percent 6% of all COVID-19 deaths are due to COVID-19.
Can we stop with the mandatory mind control muzzles, now?
Not quite true; https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3879064/posts?page=4#4
This is probably not “new” information.
If someone knows how to link to previous editions of this page - I think it updates once a week - I am pretty sure that “6%” number has been there for many months.
What is important...
Since the beginning of this virus panic, the CDC has essentially counted 100% of death certificates with the word “COVID” on them as confirmed COVID fatalities.
That is NOT how the CDC counts influenza and common cold deaths.
In Palm Beach County Florida, a local news station investigated every Covid-19 related death in the county and found that a large majority can’t be attributed to Covid-19 alone.....
out of 658 reported Covid-19 deaths in the county only 86 could be contributed to Covid-19 exclusively....
For example, a 94-year-old woman who suffered from Type 2 Diabetes, Atrial Fibrillation, and Congestive Heart Failure has a cause of death listed as Accute Respiratory Failure and COVID-19 pneumonia.
If the numbers are so skewed in one County in Florida, they are very likely skewed the same way all over the country...
I'm interested in how many hospital or home workers caught Covid and how many were hospitalized and/or died. You know they have a stat on that.
L8r
I don’t think this is exactly a game-changer. I thought we already knew that various conditions left folks more vulnerable to dying of covid. What exactly is new here? Okay, maybe that 6% of folks who died had absolutely nothing else wrong with them and other than covid were models of perfect health. Okay, fine. Why is that significant when half, hell 2/3rds, of America over 60 has got something wrong with them, diabetes, high blood pressure copd, etc.?
Primary means of COVID-19 death are viral (COVID) pneumonia, ARDS, low blood oxygen levels, blood clots, cardiac arrest, etc...apparently about 6% of doctors/coroners just put “COVID-19” on the death certificate. When you are critical in an ICU/on a ventilator lots of things potentially start going bad with your body, leading to the other “94%” of things mentioned on the death certificates in addition to COVID-19.
https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#underlying-med-conditions
No, haven't you heard? They're permanent, if democrats get their way.
God forbid that happens or I might step off the ledge.
It’s significant if only because the amount of fear-mongering that can be done with less than 10,000 deaths is far less than with 160,000. Nothing underlying has changed, but CDC is suddenly being more honest about what is actually going on.
We have no way of knowing how many of those >160000 deaths actually had COVID-19 as a comorbidity, and how many were just counted as that for financial reasons.
Simple solution to the pandemic,,,,Make HCQ and Azithromycin OTC drugs so anyone who develops a cough and/or fever can go the nearest drug store and self medicate with the drugs along with Zinc Sulfate with correct dosage within 48 hours of symptoms and pandemic over.,,,,,instead of waiting a few days to get tested and 5 days for the results,,,,if over 60 years of age,,,,you’re dead.
WTH?
29 Aug: NYT: Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be.
The usual diagnostic tests may simply be too sensitive and too slow to contain the spread of the virus.
By Apoorva Mandavilli
Instead, new data underscore the need for more widespread use of rapid tests, even if they are less sensitive.
“The decision not to test asymptomatic people is just really backward,” said Dr. Michael Mina, an epidemiologist at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, referring to the C.D.C. recommendation.
“In fact, we should be ramping up testing of all different people,” he said, “but we have to do it through whole different mechanisms.”...
In three sets of testing data that include cycle thresholds, compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The Times found.
On Thursday, the United States recorded 45,604 new coronavirus cases, according to a database maintained by The Times. If the rates of contagiousness in Massachusetts and New York were to apply nationwide, then perhaps only 4,500 of those people may actually need to isolate and submit to contact tracing...
In Massachusetts, from 85 to 90 percent of people who tested positive in July with a cycle threshold of 40 would have been deemed negative if the threshold were 30 cycles, Dr. Mina said. “I would say that none of those people should be contact-traced, not one,” he said.
Other experts informed of these numbers were stunned.
“I’m really shocked that it could be that high — the proportion of people with high C.T. value results,” said Dr. Ashish Jha, director of the Harvard Global Health Institute. “Boy, does it really change the way we need to be thinking about testing.”
Dr. Jha said he had thought of the PCR test as a problem because it cannot scale to the volume, frequency or speed of tests needed. “But what I am realizing is that a really substantial part of the problem is that we’re not even testing the people who we need to be testing,” he said.
The number of people with positive results who aren’t infectious is particularly concerning, said Scott Becker, executive director of the Association of Public Health Laboratories. “That worries me a lot, just because it’s so high,” he said, adding that the organization intended to meet with Dr. Mina to discuss the issue...
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html
Okay, but to say that 150k out of 160k had something else wrong with them isn’t the same as saying that those 150k would have died anyway. Some of them undoubtedly would have died anyway, but many of them probably wouldn’t have, i.e., they were getting by with their diabetes, high blood pressure, etc., and would have continued to do so without the virus.
PLANDEMIC DOCUMENTARY: THE HIDDEN AGENDA BEHIND COVID-19
https://www.bitchute.com/video/IB3ijQuLkkUr/
SHOCK REPORT: This Week CDC Quietly Updated COVID-19 Numbers – Only 9,210 Americans Died From COVID-19 Alone – Rest Had Different Other Serious Illnesses
What they will say is that over 50% of the population has some of these comorbidities, e.g high blood pressure 1/3 of US population, e.g. being over weight is one of them, 70 million in US are classified as being obese , asthma, diabetes, high cholesterol,cancer survivor (Herman Cain) -these all count as comorbidities so-probably 75% of US population has one or more so idk if this is going to help
behind paywall:
28 Aug: UK Times: All children who died of Covid-19 were already seriously ill
by Rhys Blakely, Science Correspondent
No child who was not already profoundly ill has died of Covid-19 in Britain, a large study has indicated, with the researchers saying that the results should reassure parents as a new school term begins.
The study looked at 260 hospitals in England, Wales and Scotland. Out of the 69,500 patients admitted with proven Covid-19 in the first six months of the year, 651 — or 0.9 per cent — were under 19 years of age.
Six deaths of minors were recorded. Three were newborn babies with other severe health problems. The other three were aged 15 to 18 years old and also had “profound health issues”.
Calum Semple, professor in child health and outbreak medicine at the University of Edinburgh, who is the senior author of the study, said...
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/all-children-who-died-of-covid-19-were-already-seriously-ill-jlxr8mkxq
28 Aug: STV Scotland: ‘Children not put at direct harm going back to school’
The study, published in The BMJ, is the largest in the world examining children hospitalised with Covid-19.
They stressed the absolute risk to children being admitted to hospital is “tiny” and the risk of needing critical care is “even tinier”...
Six children died in the study, all of whom had “profound comorbidities”.
“Severe disease is rare and death is vanishingly rare,” said Calum Semple, professor of child health and outbreak medicine at the University of Liverpool...
The new study, published in The BMJ, examined data on children and young people admitted to hospital with Covid-19 across England, Wales and Scotland...
Separately, Professor Athimalaipet Ramanan, consultant paediatric rheumatologist at Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, told a Royal Society of Medicine webinar that persistent fever and abdominal pain are “key presenting features” of the syndrome and should “not be ignored and should get medical attention”.
He said studies to date have shown most children respond well to intravenous immunoglobulin and steroids as treatment, and added his voice to the reassurance about children returning to school.
He said: “I think the benefits of children going to school significantly outweigh any tiny risk.”...
When asked about the number of black children admitted to critical care, Prof Semple said: “The fundamental issue here is that we did not have any deaths in otherwise healthy school-aged children.
“So, a black completely healthy child, no risk at all.
“In fact, the deaths that we did observe, where children are what we would describe as profound comorbidities – not a touch of asthma, not cystic fibrosis, these were children with profound comorbidities which, in normal circumstances would lead you to think that these children had existing life-limiting conditions
“So that that’s the sort of the key feature here is that Sars coronavirus is not causing death in children.
Prof Semple said the study was a “gargantuan” effort on behalf of NHS staff, with around 3,000 nurses and medical students from 216 hospitals filling in paper-based reports and manually uploading them to the study team.
https://news.stv.tv/scotland/children-not-put-at-direct-harm-going-back-to-school-by-covid-19
btt
Bullshit.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.