I’ll take that “I don’t remember” as a yes.
There goes that selective memory again. I think Hillary wore that out.
Did she add there was no transcript of the meeting, no video, and her favorite phrase is “I don’t remember.”?
I guess it’s a legal nuance that I don’t grasp. On the one hand, we have the Fifth Amendment that says you can’t be forced to testify against yourself. It’s an Amendment to the Constitution, so it must really mean something, right. It’s kind of a big deal. On the other hand, if called upon to testify about pretty much anything at all, you can just say “I don’t remember”. You don’t need a Fifth Amendment for that. Just “I don’t remember” and you can skip out of any kind of testimony at all. So, really, why bother to have the Fifth Amendment? Turns out you can’t be compelled to testify about anything.
Where’s Spock when you need him? A little bit of the Vulcan Mind Meld would do nicely here.
She’s doing a partial Hillary, but nobody does the “I do not recall”, “I have no complete recollection” as well as the master.
There is going to be a veritable parade of “I don’t remember”s through the course of these hearings.
It is amazing how these highly respected and professional government employees all suffer from memory problems. It really is a pandemic. Me thinks all government employees should be laid off until there is a vaccination. Additionally, they should wear helmets (like the kids on the short bus). It’s for their protection, heavy forbid they suffer another brain related injury. We need to do everything we can for their safety.
Ah, the ol’ hillary defense...”I don’t recall”. Arrest and waterboard these criminal seditious losers. Then, they will “remember”.
Holding hearings on a timely basis, instead of 4 years after the fact, would obviate the “not remembering” game. Having skill in examining witnesses would come in handy too.
....claiming that neither Obama nor Biden tried to influence any investigation during the small meeting on Jan. 5, 2017, ....
Then, why have a meeting?????
Bring the proof and charge her with perjury! NOW!
I thought the whole point of the meeting was to nail General Flynn using the Logan Act. Why didn't someone ask her if she had any contemporaneous notes of the meeting ? In most law schools hey emphasize taking notes for all important meetings.
Translation: Yes he did.
The bitch signed two FISA warrants for Carter Page. She kept silent when she knew Comey and others were going “rogue.” She defied President Trump’s immigration E.O., and was fired for it. No matter what she claims, she’s complicit as all hell.
Having watched Sally Yates in her past performance, I don’t trust what she says now.
Linda Graham: Did Joe Biden suggest going after Flynn with the Logan Act?
Sally Yates: Senator, it was almost 4 years ago, I don’t recall any discussion of the Logan Act...
Linda Graham: OK Ms. Yates, now we are getting somewhere...
Linda to aide at hearing: Psst...hey get Maria Bartiromo on the phone; I’m ready for Sunday!
My follow-up question would have been, “You don’t remember. Is that because Biden is such a lightweight you didn’t pay any attention to him?”
If she says No, then, “Well, then, what did he say?”
Donald Trump tweets as seen from https://rantingly.com today.
The Yates hearing on Capitol Hill was another disaster for the police-state Democrats. It reinforced two critical things about them:
1) They worship abuses of power and political spying & have no intentions of giving either up
2) They genuinely despise this country & our rules.