Posted on 07/31/2020 1:42:39 PM PDT by Magnatron
A federal appeals court has vacated the death sentence of Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, based on the opinion that the judge in the case did not vet the jury properly with regard to possible bias stemming from pretrial publicity.
A core promise of our criminal-justice system is that even the very worst among us deserves to be fairly tried and lawfully punished a point forcefully made by the then-U.S. Attorney for Massachusetts during a presser at the trial's end," the three-judge panel wrote.
They added: "To help make that promise a reality, decisions long on our books say that a judge handling a case involving prejudicial pretrial publicity must elicit 'the kind and degree' of each prospective juror's 'exposure to the case or the parties,' if asked by counsel, see Patriarca v. United States, 402 F.2d 314, 318 (1st Cir. 1968) only then can the judge reliably assess whether a potential juror can ignore that publicity, as the law requires. But despite a diligent effort, the judge here did not meet the standard set by Patriarca and its successors.
Tsarnaev was convicted and sentenced to death in 2015 for carrying out the April 15, 2013 attack at the marathon finish line with his older brother Tamerlan Tsarnaev, who died in a shootout with police after a manhunt.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Yeah, I guess you need an impartial jury to judge a case where you definitively killed three people and maimed 260. It's unfair to put this guy to death under such circumstances!
Funny how McVeigh never got that kind of consideration.
May he rot in Super Max - alone; for the rest of whatever life he has left with no visitors.
Now, we need to flush out the ClownBammy cockrocches who did this.
Jail for judges who allow such evil rulings. Jail for much of DC and its tentacles through-out USA.
Now, we need to flush out the ClownBammy cockroaches who did this.
Is this actually written somewhere or are they just making it up?
I asked mods to pull. Another of these is up and search didn’t find it.
Great, now he will get Willie Horton furloughs.
I asked mods to pull. Another of these is up and search didnt find it.
Getting a fair trial is not the same as giving the perp an even break.
Getting a fair trial is not the same as giving the perp an even break.
Age Title Judge Duty station Born Term of service Appointed by 64 Chief Judge Jeffrey R. Howard Concord, NH 1955 2002present &2015present G.W. Bush 86 Circuit Judge Juan R. Torruella San Juan, PR 1933 1984present &19942001 Reagan 73 Circuit Judge Sandra Lynch Boston, MA 1946 1995present &20082015 Clinton 68 Circuit Judge O. Rogeriee Thompson Providence, RI 1951 2010present Obama 66 Circuit Judge William J. Kayatta Jr. Portland, ME 1953 2013present Obama 52 Circuit Judge David Jeremiah Barron Boston, MA 1967 2014present Obama ====================== 92 Senior Circuit Levin H. Campbell inactive 1927 19721992 1992present Nixon &19831990 85 Senior Circuit Bruce M. Selya Providence, RI 1934 19862006 2006present Reagan 80 Senior Circuit Michael Boudin Boston, MA 1939 19922013 2013present G.H.W. Bush &20012008 88 Senior Circuit Norman H. Stahl Boston, MA 1931 19922001 2001present G.H.W. Bush 78 Senior Circuit Kermit Lipez Portland, ME 1941 19982011 2011present Clinton
& denotes Chief Judge of the Court
* denotes Federalist Society member
According to Critical Race Theory Intersectionality, Darker complexioned Islamic Immigrant Tsarnaev ranks higher than white skinned American born socialist atheist McVey. Therefore Tsarnaev gets to live.
There were no dissents. (Torruella filed a separate opinion which concurred in part, joined in part, and concurred in the judgment.)
He gets two choices, either get executed or can live in a cell 23.5 hrs a day with no visitation or natural light and as little human contact as possible. A pistol with one round will be provided after 1 month.
Now come the Tsa shirts for his freedom.
(Like Che)
Huh? McVeigh got a venue change from Oklahoma to Colorado.
Commenting before I’ve read the opinion is always a risky proposition, but: How can a problem with jury selection invalidate the jury’s sentencing recommendation but not the same jury’s guilty verdict?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.