Posted on 07/15/2020 10:59:17 AM PDT by Politically Correct
A statistically significant difference
For those who are not convinced of the observational result, we conducted a statistical difference test by comparing the three periods: May 28th – June 8th, June 9th – 22nd, June 23rd – July 6th . The period from June 9th till the 22nd is that in which the index increased some 13 days after the suspension of hydroxychloroquine. There is of course an effect of delay between stopping the prescription of the drug and possible deaths, which explains the delay of 13 days.
We therefore observe that for the period from the 28th of May till the 8th of June, the index is 2.39% and then drops to 11.52% or 4.8 times more and then drops to 3%.
When testing for statistical significance between the various observations, the difference is significant at 99% with a p <0.0001. 13 days after the HCQ prescription was resumed, the index dropped to 3% and this was again a significant effect.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
In some states there are prohibitions against off label prescription.
Leveled by the phamacy boards
In others it may only be used once hospitalized so you have to be really sick, and it does not work so well
There is downright hostility and scorn by some medical orgs against using it, which intimidates doctors and their managers
They have been indoctrinated to wait for clinical trials ( which could kill the untreated patients in the control group..,would you sign up?) and peer reviewed studies which take months or years
And there is an amazing amount of TDS on twitter by some very credentialed and high placed DRs
So the answer is yes...DR can refuse to prescribe
You can get better access to these drugs in third world countries
One of the best kept secrets around is BHT and its ability to kill LIPID covered viruses amongst them the corona virus.
BHT short for butylatedhydroxytoluene, has been around for the better part of thirty years or more, has been approved as a food additive by the FDA as safe for human consumption in small quantities and using common sense. Without going into all the details which would fill many pages some of the benefits are difficult to ignore even so pharmaceutical as well as the medical profession does their best to do so. As a prophylactic it would serve its purpose very well until the right vaccine comes along, without any undesirable side effects, besides being inexpensive and is safer than alcohol consumption, use of tobacco or many other unhealthy eating habits, including many prescription dugs with, many of them having undesirable side effects. No doubt whenever you had a prescription filled it came along with a sheet filled with warnings.
Some of the reasons are that that there is no money to be made by pharmaceutical companies as patents related to BHT ran out long time ago and in order to have it approved for medical application it would require an immeasurable amounts of human tests with expenditures in the millions of Dollars which most likely will never be recovered.
On the other hand many doctors may know about it but will refrain from suggesting it as recommending anything which is not approved by the FDA would leave them wide open to lawsuits, as it is pretty well known that one of the American dreams is, to fall on your neighbors property and then sue them for what ever they can get.
Over the years enough information about BHT has surfaced that if used in small quantities to achieve a particular result, such as from 100 mg to about 1g (one gram or 1000mg) and in most cases 250mg to 450mg may do a nice job for some of the things suggested, it may be less harmful than an equivalent amount of Aspirins. Again do your own research and use common sense which appears to be in short supply these days. Should you decide to try don’t go overboard with it, as more is not always better.
Even so if you still apprehensive or hesitant, use it only when one of those nasty viruses appears on the scene and use it as a prophylactic in a small quantity perhaps up to 450 mg and once the danger subside stop taking it. The catch is that in order to do its job BHT works better before you get sick, as BHT will NOT REPAIR ANY DAMAGE which may already have been done by an infectious disease such as the corona virus. Even so, if taken afterwards BHT will still continue to disable lipid covered viruses, but to repair any damage already caused may require different medications.
One suggested way of taking BHT is to dissolve the quantity you intend to take first in oil as BHT is only soluble in either oil or alcohol, I is also much better absorbed by the human body, but alcohol is not recommended to consume along with BHT. One way of doing it is to dissolve 18 grams or 277 grains, if you happen to have a powder scale used for reloading, of BHT in 200 milliliters of olive oil in a small glass bottle. Then heat it up slightly in a microwave for maybe 40 seconds and then shake it a few times. A teaspoon of this substance, depending on its size will give you approx. 450 mg of BHT which in most cases should do the trick.
So why take BHT on the firs place? It has been long known that BHT will damage the lipid layer or cover from LIPID COVERED viruses and the coronavirus happens to be just such one of such viruses and by doing so will prevent such a virus from attaching itself and do its dirty work.
The Principal Benefits of BHT
In order of importance, supplementing with BHT can help with:
Reduce and prevent viral infections such as herpes, thus terminating their outbreaks. But BHT is also effective against many different human and animal viruses including CMV (cytomegalovirus),9 pseudorabies,10 genital herpes,11HIV,12 and many strains of influenza. These are just a few but not all of the viruses that have a lipid envelope and may be killed by BHT include herpes simplex I, herpes simplex II, herpes zoster, CMV, West Nile virus, HIV virus, influenza virus, hepatitis B and C viruses, avian flu influenza virus and the SARS virus. However, BHT has not been clinically tested to treat and address these infections individually, and there probably never will be as no money can be made. Here, it may be of interest to note that a patent had been filed with the number US4350707 for BHT because of its LIPID COVERED virus killing ability approximately 30 years ago, however in the meantime this patent has expired.
Now keep in mind that very few things in life are perfect and this holds true for vaccines as well as BHT. So when everything comes down to being cut and dried, do you prefer risking being infected with a nasty virus with all kinds of unpredictable side effects or take a chance with some substance which overall has a very good safety record.
Besides most viruses will mutate over time, and by the time someone may come up with the proper vaccine it may no longer match the virus which is currently making its round. But this doesn’t make any difference with BHT if such a virus mutates or not. As long as such a virus has a lipid coating it will damage and disable it..
One of my hunches is, of course it is only speculation, and is based on how vaccination generally works. After BHT has finished the deactivation process of a given virus, such a virus may no longer have the potential to harm the human body, however any remnants of it may encourage our immune system to spring into action and produce anti bodies against this particular virus. Basically this is how immunization works by injecting a deactivated virus in anticipation that our immune system responds to it and begins to fight the real thing, when it come along by means of antibodies it has developed in the mean time.
I for one and many others who have been using BHT off and on for the past thirty years whenever one of these lipid covered viruses made their rounds have been pretty lucky and successful to keep those nasty viruses at bay..
If you are interested enough you may want to watch this short movie clip on YouTube………
BHT and Coronavirus | LIFE EXTENSION BOOK RESEARCH ...
www.youtube.com › watch
And by the way and for what it is worth...
To date, there has never been a successful coronavirus vaccine made, due to the nature of the virus. Additionally, past attempts to create a coronavirus vaccine have ONLY RESULTED IN LEAVING THE VACCINATED PERSON WITH A HIGHER CHANCE OF SERIOUS ILLNESS AND DEATH WHEN LATER EXPOSED TO ANOTHER STRAIN OF THE VIRUS
People like Joe Scarboro, Neil Cavuto and Dr Faustus who recommended AGAINST using hydroxychoroquine killed people.
I'm familiar with statistical analysis of drug study results. They can always be manipulated and I did not do a deep dive beyond the OP. But generally speaking studies showing a P of 0.0001 would only require a 95% confidence interval to garner approval from the FDA. If this phrase means a 99% CI that means the odds of the results being a fluke are 99:1.
Again, FDA would only require 20:1 odds of efficacy assuming safety is determined. We know HCQ is safe as it has been around for 60 odd years and taken by many millions of people daily. It does have some long term risks but those would not apply to a 14 day regimen.
FDA needs to rescind its rescinding of HCQ use for Covid therapy. Many of us here have known for 6 months already that it works well but it has to be given early upon diagnosis or onset of symptoms. That is just axiomatic. The sooner you intervene to treat a medical condition the greater the likelihood of a positive outcome.
The rules probably vary by state. Some state governors have way overstepped and are demanding that pharmacists rat out doctors who prescribe it for Covid.
As with many other things in life that we’re way out ahead on—due to a massive brain trust—FReepers are sitting here going, “Well, DUH! Oh, and don’t forget the Zinc!”
Suppose it were determined that Hydroxychloroquine were a cure for cv19, cancer and ingrown toenail. The media would willingly suppress that information and let people die.
As a retired doctor that chose to keep my license up to date I wouldn't care so much about the pharmacist ratting me out. That I can deal with.
The fact is that they won't give it out if I say I'm using it for Covid. They get in trouble with their pharmacy oversight committees.
To get it I would have to lie about what I'm treating and that gets me in much more trouble with my oversight commmittees.
It's an outrage.
bkmk
I don’t think that is correct. There are several approved uses of HCQ and the FDA would catch hell if they revoked it from use except in a clinical or hospital setting. Everything I read says that doctors can still use it “off label”.
If an adult tests positive for CV-19 they should be given a two week ‘scrip for HCQ, Zinc sulfate and Zpack if they have breathing problems - those should go to the ER.
FU Fauci.
The official ban on HCQ has long since passed the reckless manslaughter state and officials doing the banning can now legally be charged with first degree murder.
Anyone going to a malaria inclined area takes 2 HCQ pills - one per week before travel and then 1 per week while in country.
Others with Lupus and other maladies take it daily for years, safely. Add the Zinc sulfate (an essential mineral) and its extremely effective against CV-19.
Big Pharma/Fauci/Birx just want an expensive vaccine and the Dims want to stretch this pandemic through the election.
The Zpack is for patients with breathing difficulties - they should probably be hospitalized.
BTW Fauci has been working on an AIDS vaccine for 36 years.
No luck yet.
IMHO.
In some states, doctors cannot prescribe it except in hospital.
Besides the medical board, the pharmaceutical board is telling pharmacists not to fill it.
My doctor quit, so I was looking around for a doctor. Asked about HCQ for covid, they all said no. One said it was because of FDA information on it.
I was able to get it as a prophylactic for covid from this site:
https://speakwithanmd.com/corsination/
by paying their fee and getting their prescription filled locally.
Not many pills, but I feel better having it on hand with zinc and the antibiotic. (Zinc I got from Amazon)
I know I can’t get a doctor in this state to prescribe it for me.
Even the pharmaceutical board sent a notice not to fill it for covid. I saw the notice online
I was afraid I wouldn’t be able to get it filled, but I did. Maybe because it was only 8 pills.
Quercetin is supposedly a zinc ionophore too and you don’t need a prescription for that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.