Posted on 07/12/2020 11:11:17 AM PDT by Kaslin
One aspect of the various executive orders being issued all around the country impacts most retail businesses and private social groups, as well as public offices and spaces. Many of these EOs require stores and other public-facing operations wishing to reopen to mandate the wearing of face masks for not only employees but visitors to the establishment. This is quite common where I live, and the rules apply to most operations in a large number of states. But such an order leaves one very big question unanswered. What if the customer or visitor refuses to don a mask? Who is responsible for forcing them into compliance or physically blocking their entrance to the facility? That’s a question plaguing some of the nation’s major employers this month. NBC News published a brief report on this topic this week. (YouTube)
Countless viral videos show retail and restaurant employees taking heat from customers over mask requirements. While some business owners are training staff on how to deescalate the situation, others think employees shouldn’t be the ones required to enforce mask policies.
While this may not sound like a huge deal to some people, at least at first glance, we have already seen numerous examples of just how wrong such a situation can go. One of the worst of them took place in France, where bus drivers were given the responsibility of not allowing any passengers onboard sans face mask. One bus driver attempted to follow this mandate by asking four passengers to put on masks before boarding. He was rewarded for his trouble by being dragged out of his bus and literally beaten to death. (CNN)
A bus driver in France who was beaten up by passengers refusing to wear mandatory face masks died in hospital Friday, French Prime Minister Jean Castex and the victim’s family have said.
Philippe Monguillot, 59, was left brain dead after the attack in the southwestern city of Bayonne on July 5. His family decided to switch of his life support on Friday, news agency Agence France-Presse reported.
“We decided to let him go. The doctors were in favor and we were as well,” the victim’s 18-year-old daughter, Marie Monguillot, told AFP. Four men were detained and charged following the assault.
We’ve seen plenty of examples of similar incidents in the United States already, though thankfully none quite so brutal as this. But don’t be surprised if the same thing happens in America at some point.
And that brings us to the question of the day. If the local, municipal or state government issues an order saying that masks are mandatory inside of stores, churches, or anyplace else in the private sector, whose responsibility is it to enforce that decree? Sure, the store can put up a sign saying that masks are “required” to enter and do business. I don’t leave the house much these days (obviously) but I’ve seen plenty of such signs on the rare occasions when I’ve had to venture out. But what happens if someone ignores the sign and walks in anyway?
Certainly, an employee or manager could politely remind them, but the person could just as easily refuse. And then what? You can tell them that they won’t be served and wait for them to give up and leave, I suppose. But if they become belligerent, you’re probably going to have to call the cops on them. Given how long the average police response time is, you now have some time on your hands with a stock clerk or cashier facing down a potentially violent individual. And I’m sure that stories about your place of business calling the cops on somebody looking to pick up a bag of grass seed will do wonders for your customer approval ratings.
I’m not saying there’s an ideal solution to this problem staring us in the face. There aren’t enough cops in any precinct in the nation to station one outside every Target, Walmart and gas station to make sure everyone is complying with the local mask orders. But it’s the consumer who refuses to wear the mask who should be held accountable if anyone must be. Fining or otherwise punishing businesses and churches for being unable to control the behavior of their customers or members can not be allowed as long as a good-faith effort was made to inform the public of the rules.
The situation will be much more fun soon enough. Many of the big stores now have many more very high resolution cameras with high speed networks behind them for facial recognition. They’re not like the older small shop systems that most of you have been seeing video from.
Those systems are being tested in stores now and are being used for training and further system development in coordination with security contractors, police, lawyers, judges and others. I’ve seen video and photos from one of those new systems, and they’re amazing. Clerks in many of the stores will be wearing body cams and communication devices. Those are already being tested.
Expect to see outrage from a new lower class of people about unforeseen trespassing issues in the very near future. What happens to them will be a surprise and example to many.
And some of you might be wondering about the pandemic of narcissism we’ve been seeing. It has been growing since the 1980s and has affected large portions of two generations of adults. Drugs, fatherlessness...there are several causes. Looks like we’ll be simply doing away with those who don’t learn to behave, little by little.
Another development... Store managers and their immediate staff in some of the big stores are watching employees closely for a predefined period for negative reactions to wearing masks, physical distancing and other policies. You can probably guess what’s going to happen to those employees before long (see personality assessments, discipline, etc.).
I was visiting the town of Prescott,AZ this weekend. One of the bars that was closed down had a sign that said something like “We have been closed by order of the governor. If you are unhappy with this decision we suggest you contact the governor’s office (phone number) to voice your displeasure as we have.” I wish now I had taken a picture of it because it was awesome.
These big retailers are covering their asses to protect themselves from lawsuits by employees and customers who claim they got infected inside the business establishments.
Geez hard to argue with such dazzling brilliance.
Agreed.
It’s hard to have a conversation with losers.
I have completely ignored all the signs saying masks are ‘required’. No one has said anything at all to me about it.
I like that. Works for me.
:-D
BOOKMARK
BOOKMARK
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.