Posted on 05/22/2020 6:36:13 AM PDT by Enlightened1
Gateway Pundit readers may recall a recent story we did that shed light on hundreds, possibly thousands, of Oregon voters who mysteriously had their party changed, most from Republican to Non Affiliated, without their permission, consent or knowledge, effectively denying them the right to vote in their party’s primary and disqualifying them from being Precinct Committee Persons.
Earlier today Facebook gave The Gateway Pundit a strike for posting this story even though we had 32 statements from different Oregon Republican voters to back up our report.
Despite hundreds of people coming forward with similar stories about how they received a non affiliated ballot, and despite many screenshots from the Facebook group mentioned in our article, Facebook’s infamous “fact checkers” deemed the story as “misinformation” at the request of the Oregon state government.
This is what people see when a link to the article comes up in their feed:
Lead Stories flagged The Gateway Pundit article and issued the strike as a “hoax alert.”
Lead stories author Alexis Tereszcuk did not contact any of the 30+ Oregon voters who said their party affiliation was changed.
Instead Alexis spoke with the Oregon Secretary of State who denied there was any malfeasance.
She mentions that in her article at Lead Stories:
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Looks like the Leftist are in full mode to steal the election in 2020.
If a private company censors speech on its platform at the bidding of a government authority, would *that* be a violation of the First Amendment?
All these tech companies act as Publishers and their exemption should be revoked immediately, or the Feds should just BAN their Domain from the USA for being UnAmerican and Discriminatory
I am pretty sure you are 100% correct.
Exactly and they would be shut down tomorrow.
Exactly. There is no way this is not deemed a STate Action. Any of the old arguments that Facebook can do anything it wants as a private company are completely and legally irrelevant in this scenario.
We need to get rid of juries and prosecutors and just ask criminals if they did it or not. /s
Bump
ping!
If a private company censors speech on its platform at the bidding of a government authority, would *that* be a violation of the First Amendment?
Actually that would be fascism.
Depends on the judge.
When do the book burnings start?
When does Fakebook and Google start feeding Christians to the lions?
Why the hell can’t some tech-savvy entrepreneur who is conservative or at least isn’t a far, far leftist create an alternative to Facebook—one that is not only fair-minded but safe from hackers?
bump
What gives Oregon the authority to violate the First Amendment?
Facebook has such a Bad Rap right now. My kids say that No One under, at least 30, use it. My friend only use Messenger to get their infonto friends, and post only highly-photoshpped pics and virtue signaling on the site itself
More CCP Girl work at Facebook. Suckerberger now gets his orders directly from Beijing
I lived in Portland, from 1994 to 2000, where they went from actual voting locations, and chads, to everything voted on by mail. You received 2 booklets, one an explanation of the whats, the whoms, and the whys, and the other booklet, the ballot, the instructions, and the envelope, post paid.
Yup, SNAFU!!
parler.com
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.